Intel Core i9-13900K testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI (1401 BIOS) and ASUS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12GB on EndeavourOS rolling via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2401264-NE-RTX4070SU09
RTX 4070 SUPER
Intel Core i9-13900K testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI (1401 BIOS) and ASUS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12GB on EndeavourOS rolling via the Phoronix Test Suite.
NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER:
Processor: Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.50GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI (1401 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7a27, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 4001GB Seagate ZP4000GP304001, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: ARZOPA, Network: Intel I226-V + Intel Device 7a70
OS: EndeavourOS rolling, Kernel: 6.7.1-arch1-1 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.27.10, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.11, Display Driver: NVIDIA 550.40.07, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.4.74, Compiler: GCC 13.2.1 20230801, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
RTX 4070 SUPER:
Processor: Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.50GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI (1401 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7a27, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 4001GB Seagate ZP4000GP304001, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: ARZOPA, Network: Intel I226-V + Intel Device 7a70
OS: EndeavourOS rolling, Kernel: 6.7.1-arch1-1 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.27.10, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.11, Display Driver: NVIDIA 550.40.07, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.4.74, Compiler: GCC 13.2.1 20230801, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER:
Processor: Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.50GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI (1401 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7a27, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 4001GB Seagate ZP4000GP304001, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: ARZOPA, Network: Intel I226-V + Intel Device 7a70
OS: EndeavourOS rolling, Kernel: 6.7.1-arch1-1 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.27.10, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.11, Display Driver: NVIDIA 550.40.07, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.4.74, Compiler: GCC 13.2.1 20230801 + CUDA 12.3, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
GpuOwl 7.2.1
Exponent: 77936867
Iterations / Second > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 646.41 |===============================================
GpuOwl 7.2.1
Exponent: 332220523
Iterations / Second > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 137.44 |===============================================
OctaneBench 2020.1
Total Score
Score > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 720.97 |===================================================
vkpeak 20230730
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
GpuOwl 7.2.1
Exponent: 57885161
Iterations / Second > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 869.07 |===============================================
FAHBench 2.3.2
Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 366.06 |===================================================
LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: GPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 12.82 |====================================================
LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: GPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 13.59 |====================================================
IndigoBench 4.4
Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: Bedroom
M samples/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 19.80 |====================================================
VkResample 1.0
Upscale: 2x - Precision: Double
ms < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 339.59 |===================================================
IndigoBench 4.4
Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: Supercar
M samples/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 52.81 |====================================================
LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: GPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 11.72 |====================================================
LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: GPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 10.56 |====================================================
Blender 4.0
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 51.30 |====================================================
NAMD CUDA 2.14
ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms
days/ns < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 0.06791 |==================================================
Blender 4.0
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 9.45 |=====================================================
RealSR-NCNN 20200818
Scale: 4x - TAA: Yes
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 34.89 |====================================================
RealSR-NCNN 20200818
Scale: 4x - TAA: No
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 6.323 |====================================================
Blender 4.0
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 5.57 |=====================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 122 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 115 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 117 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 119 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-T
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 109 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-N
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 102 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 96.8 |=====================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 87.2 |=====================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 70.8 |=====================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - sDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 165 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - sAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 156 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - sCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 132 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 613 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 599 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 584 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 577 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-T
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 389 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-N
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 210 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 458 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 437 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 423 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - sDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 370 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - sAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 392 |======================================================
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - sCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 334 |======================================================
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
RTX 4070 SUPER . 103.17 |======================================================
Blender 4.0
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 14.29 |====================================================
Blender 4.0
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 12.60 |====================================================
ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2
Operation: Memory Bandwidth Coalesced Write
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 455.01 |===============================================
ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2
Operation: Memory Bandwidth Coalesced Read
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 464.86 |===============================================
ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2
Operation: INT8 Compute
TIOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 14.31 |================================================
ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2
Operation: INT16 Compute
TIOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 17.17 |================================================
ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2
Operation: INT32 Compute
TIOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 19.89 |================================================
ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2
Operation: INT64 Compute
TIOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 4.214 |================================================
ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2
Operation: FP32 Compute
TFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 38.59 |================================================
ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2
Operation: FP64 Compute
TFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 0.621 |================================================
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-152
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
RTX 4070 SUPER . 194.58 |======================================================
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
RTX 4070 SUPER . 102.60 |======================================================
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
RTX 4070 SUPER . 103.57 |======================================================
VkResample 1.0
Upscale: 2x - Precision: Single
ms < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 18.49 |====================================================
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
RTX 4070 SUPER . 507.45 |======================================================
clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Double
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 630.11 |===================================================
LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: GPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 27.67 |====================================================
Hashcat 6.2.4
Benchmark: SHA-512
H/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 3232733333 |===============================================
Hashcat 6.2.4
Benchmark: SHA1
H/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 22132600000 |==============================================
Hashcat 6.2.4
Benchmark: MD5
H/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 67583033333 |==============================================
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
RTX 4070 SUPER . 106.37 |======================================================
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-152
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
RTX 4070 SUPER . 195.39 |======================================================
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
RTX 4070 SUPER . 504.27 |======================================================
Hashcat 6.2.4
Benchmark: TrueCrypt RIPEMD160 + XTS
H/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 802967 |===================================================
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
RTX 4070 SUPER . 201.94 |======================================================
Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Particle Filter
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 3.480 |====================================================
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
RTX 4070 SUPER . 509.45 |======================================================
cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Copy
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 331.8 |====================================================
cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Read
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 446.2 |====================================================
cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Write
GB/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 407.5 |====================================================
Hashcat 6.2.4
Benchmark: 7-Zip
H/s > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 1176467 |==================================================
Waifu2x-NCNN Vulkan 20200818
Scale: 2x - Denoise: 3 - TAA: Yes
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 2.855 |====================================================
FinanceBench 2016-07-25
Benchmark: Black-Scholes OpenCL
ms < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 5.912 |====================================================
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth
GBPS > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 437.65 |===================================================
MandelGPU 1.3pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 587219538.2 |==============================================
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-152
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
Waifu2x-NCNN Vulkan 20200818
Scale: 2x - Denoise: 3 - TAA: No
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Integer Compute INT
GIOPS > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 18170.54 |=================================================
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-152
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
PyTorch 2.1
Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50
batches/sec > Higher Is Better
clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Float
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 35492.69 |=================================================
NeatBench 5
Acceleration: GPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 4070 |=====================================================
PlaidML
FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: DenseNet 201 - Device: OpenCL
Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better
PlaidML
FP16: Yes - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL
Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better
PlaidML
FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL
Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better
PlaidML
FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: IMDB LSTM - Device: OpenCL
Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better
PlaidML
FP16: No - Mode: Training - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL
Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better
GROMACS 2023
Implementation: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare
Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better
LeelaChessZero 0.30
Backend: OpenCL
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
Libplacebo 5.229.1
FPS > Higher Is Better
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N
Mixbench 2020-06-23
Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Single Precision
Mixbench 2020-06-23
Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Double Precision
VkFFT 1.2.31
Test: FFT + iFFT R2C / C2R
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU
ms < Lower Is Better
Caffe 2020-02-13
Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 1000
Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better
Caffe 2020-02-13
Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 200
Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better
Caffe 2020-02-13
Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 1000
Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better
Caffe 2020-02-13
Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 200
Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better
Caffe 2020-02-13
Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 100
Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better
Betsy GPU Compressor 1.1 Beta
Codec: ETC2 RGB - Quality: Highest
Seconds < Lower Is Better
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP
Mixbench 2020-06-23
Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Single Precision
Mixbench 2020-06-23
Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Double Precision
Mixbench 2020-06-23
Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Half Precision
Mixbench 2020-06-23
Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Integer
Mixbench 2020-06-23
Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Integer
VkFFT 1.2.31
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C Bluestein in single precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
VkFFT 1.2.31
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in half precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
Caffe 2020-02-13
Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 100
Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better
ArrayFire 3.9
Test: Conjugate Gradient OpenCL
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D
VkFFT 1.2.31
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C multidimensional in single precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
VkFFT 1.2.31
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in double precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
Betsy GPU Compressor 1.1 Beta
Codec: ETC1 - Quality: Highest
Seconds < Lower Is Better
VkFFT 1.2.31
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in single precision, no reshuffling
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
VkFFT 1.2.31
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C Bluestein benchmark in double precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
VkFFT 1.2.31
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in single precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better