RTX 4070 SUPER

Intel Core i9-13900K testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI (1401 BIOS) and ASUS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12GB on EndeavourOS rolling via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2401264-NE-RTX4070SU09
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

BLAS (Basic Linear Algebra Sub-Routine) Tests 3 Tests
C++ Boost Tests 2 Tests
CPU Massive 4 Tests
Creator Workloads 5 Tests
Game Development 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 9 Tests
Machine Learning 6 Tests
Multi-Core 7 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 29 Tests
OpenCL 6 Tests
OpenMPI Tests 2 Tests
Python Tests 4 Tests
Renderers 3 Tests
Scientific Computing 2 Tests
Server CPU Tests 2 Tests
Vulkan Compute 8 Tests
Common Workstation Benchmarks 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER
January 25
  27 Minutes
RTX 4070 SUPER
January 26
  5 Minutes
NVIDIA 4070 SUPER
January 26
  1 Hour, 27 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  40 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

RTX 4070 SUPER Intel Core i9-13900K testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI (1401 BIOS) and ASUS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12GB on EndeavourOS rolling via the Phoronix Test Suite. NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER: Processor: Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.50GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI (1401 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7a27, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 4001GB Seagate ZP4000GP304001, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: ARZOPA, Network: Intel I226-V + Intel Device 7a70 OS: EndeavourOS rolling, Kernel: 6.7.1-arch1-1 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.27.10, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.11, Display Driver: NVIDIA 550.40.07, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.4.74, Compiler: GCC 13.2.1 20230801, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 RTX 4070 SUPER: Processor: Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.50GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI (1401 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7a27, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 4001GB Seagate ZP4000GP304001, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: ARZOPA, Network: Intel I226-V + Intel Device 7a70 OS: EndeavourOS rolling, Kernel: 6.7.1-arch1-1 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.27.10, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.11, Display Driver: NVIDIA 550.40.07, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.4.74, Compiler: GCC 13.2.1 20230801, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 NVIDIA 4070 SUPER: Processor: Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.50GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI (1401 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7a27, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 4001GB Seagate ZP4000GP304001, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: ARZOPA, Network: Intel I226-V + Intel Device 7a70 OS: EndeavourOS rolling, Kernel: 6.7.1-arch1-1 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.27.10, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.11, Display Driver: NVIDIA 550.40.07, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.4.74, Compiler: GCC 13.2.1 20230801 + CUDA 12.3, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 NeatBench 5 Acceleration: GPU FPS > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 4070 |===================================================== MandelGPU 1.3pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU Samples/sec > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 587219538.2 |============================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 52.81 |==================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 19.80 |==================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 14.29 |==================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 51.30 |==================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 9.45 |===================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 12.60 |==================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 5.57 |===================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 613 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 599 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 584 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 577 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-T GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 389 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-N GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 210 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 458 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 437 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 423 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 370 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 392 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 334 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 122 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 115 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 117 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 119 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-T GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 109 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-N GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 102 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 96.8 |===================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 87.2 |===================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 70.8 |===================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 165 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 156 |====================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 132 |====================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 27.67 |==================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 12.82 |==================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 11.72 |==================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 10.56 |==================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 13.59 |==================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Particle Filter Seconds < Lower Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 3.480 |==================================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth GBPS > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 437.65 |=================================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Double GFLOPS > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 630.11 |=================================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Float GFLOPS > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 35492.69 |================================================= clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Integer Compute INT GIOPS > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 18170.54 |================================================= FAHBench 2.3.2 Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 366.06 |=================================================== OctaneBench 2020.1 Total Score Score > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 720.97 |=================================================== VkResample 1.0 Upscale: 2x - Precision: Single ms < Lower Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 18.49 |==================================================== VkResample 1.0 Upscale: 2x - Precision: Double ms < Lower Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 339.59 |=================================================== NAMD CUDA 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 0.06791 |================================================== cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Write GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 407.5 |==================================================== cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Read GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 446.2 |==================================================== cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Copy GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 331.8 |==================================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: TrueCrypt RIPEMD160 + XTS H/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 802967 |=================================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: SHA-512 H/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 3232733333 |=============================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: 7-Zip H/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 1176467 |================================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: SHA1 H/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 22132600000 |============================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: MD5 H/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 67583033333 |============================================== Waifu2x-NCNN Vulkan 20200818 Scale: 2x - Denoise: 3 - TAA: Yes Seconds < Lower Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 2.855 |==================================================== RealSR-NCNN 20200818 Scale: 4x - TAA: Yes Seconds < Lower Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 34.89 |==================================================== GpuOwl 7.2.1 Exponent: 332220523 Iterations / Second > Higher Is Better NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 137.44 |=============================================== GpuOwl 7.2.1 Exponent: 77936867 Iterations / Second > Higher Is Better NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 646.41 |=============================================== GpuOwl 7.2.1 Exponent: 57885161 Iterations / Second > Higher Is Better NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 869.07 |=============================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better RTX 4070 SUPER . 103.57 |====================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better RTX 4070 SUPER . 103.17 |====================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better RTX 4070 SUPER . 102.60 |====================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better RTX 4070 SUPER . 106.37 |====================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better RTX 4070 SUPER . 194.58 |====================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better RTX 4070 SUPER . 504.27 |====================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better RTX 4070 SUPER . 195.39 |====================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better RTX 4070 SUPER . 507.45 |====================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better RTX 4070 SUPER . 509.45 |====================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better RTX 4070 SUPER . 201.94 |====================================================== ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: Memory Bandwidth Coalesced Write GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 455.01 |=============================================== ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: Memory Bandwidth Coalesced Read GB/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 464.86 |=============================================== ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: INT8 Compute TIOPs/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 14.31 |================================================ ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: INT16 Compute TIOPs/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 17.17 |================================================ ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: INT32 Compute TIOPs/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 19.89 |================================================ ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: INT64 Compute TIOPs/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 4.214 |================================================ ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: FP32 Compute TFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 38.59 |================================================ ProjectPhysX OpenCL-Benchmark 1.2 Operation: FP64 Compute TFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER . 0.621 |================================================ PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: DenseNet 201 - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: Yes - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: IMDB LSTM - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Training - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU ms < Lower Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 1000 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 200 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 100 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 1000 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 200 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 100 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better GROMACS 2023 Implementation: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Black-Scholes OpenCL ms < Lower Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 5.912 |==================================================== ArrayFire 3.9 Test: Conjugate Gradient OpenCL LeelaChessZero 0.30 Backend: OpenCL Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Betsy GPU Compressor 1.1 Beta Codec: ETC2 RGB - Quality: Highest Seconds < Lower Is Better Betsy GPU Compressor 1.1 Beta Codec: ETC1 - Quality: Highest Seconds < Lower Is Better Libplacebo 5.229.1 FPS > Higher Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Single Precision Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Double Precision Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Half Precision Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Single Precision Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Double Precision Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: NVIDIA CUDA - Benchmark: Integer Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Integer VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in single precision, no reshuffling Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C Bluestein benchmark in double precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C multidimensional in single precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in single precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in double precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C Bluestein in single precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in half precision Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better VkFFT 1.2.31 Test: FFT + iFFT R2C / C2R Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Waifu2x-NCNN Vulkan 20200818 Scale: 2x - Denoise: 3 - TAA: No Seconds < Lower Is Better RealSR-NCNN 20200818 Scale: 4x - TAA: No Seconds < Lower Is Better NVIDIA 4070 SUPER . 6.323 |==================================================== vkpeak 20230730 GFLOPS > Higher Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better