amazon testing on Amazon Linux 2 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2401116-NE-C54XLARGE23
c5.4xlarge
amazon testing on Amazon Linux 2 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
c5.4xlarge:
Processor: Intel Xeon Platinum 8275CL (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Amazon EC2 c5.4xlarge (1.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 1 x 32 GB DDR4-2933MT/s, Disk: 86GB Amazon Elastic Block Store, Network: Amazon Elastic
OS: Amazon Linux 2, Kernel: 5.10.205-195.804.amzn2.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 10.5.0 20230707, File-System: xfs, System Layer: amazon
BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6
Computational Test: Dhrystone 2
LPS > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 34891471.8 |======================================================
Sysbench 1.0.20
Test: RAM / Memory
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 13064.35 |========================================================
Sysbench 1.0.20
Test: CPU
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 16070.30 |========================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 84659.7 |=========================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 64502.9 |=========================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Triad
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 72135.2 |=========================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 72228.8 |=========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Idle Latency
ns < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 91.6 |============================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 92571.04 |========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 94976.99 |========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 93614.89 |========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 92419.36 |========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 90793.49 |========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 92619.0 |=========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 93410.3 |=========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 90641.9 |=========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 83281.9 |=========================================================
Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10
Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 85012.8 |=========================================================
CacheBench
Test: Read
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 6855.99 |=========================================================
CacheBench
Test: Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 26199.35 |========================================================
CacheBench
Test: Read / Modify / Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 78600.63 |========================================================
GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1
Total Time
GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 4464.5 |==========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 1379.6 |==========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 1013.1 |==========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 353.1 |===========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 1017.9 |==========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 124.1 |===========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 921.1 |===========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 10.3 |============================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 783.4 |===========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 768.3 |===========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 1064.2 |==========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 372.2 |===========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 1027.3 |==========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 5.40 |============================================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 776.6 |===========================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 4839.42 |=========================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 5999.2 |==========================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 43.01 |===========================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 5790.0 |==========================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 42.02 |===========================================================
LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 5819.6 |==========================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: SHA256
byte/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 2492684997 |======================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: SHA512
byte/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 2783957077 |======================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: RSA4096
sign/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 2191.8 |==========================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: RSA4096
verify/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 144572.6 |========================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: ChaCha20
byte/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 40740711450 |=====================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: AES-128-GCM
byte/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 44228026277 |=====================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: AES-256-GCM
byte/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 32200747873 |=====================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305
byte/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 20607587943 |=====================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: KASUMI
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 79.28 |===========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: KASUMI - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 76.80 |===========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: AES-256
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 3349.54 |=========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: AES-256 - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 3348.65 |=========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: Twofish
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 307.13 |==========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: Twofish - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 317.19 |==========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: Blowfish
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 384.58 |==========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: Blowfish - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 380.92 |==========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: CAST-256
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 121.97 |==========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 121.81 |==========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: ChaCha20Poly1305
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 627.52 |==========================================================
Botan 2.17.3
Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 622.24 |==========================================================
x264 2022-02-22
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 17.94 |===========================================================
x264 2022-02-22
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 75.66 |===========================================================
x265 3.4
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 8.54 |============================================================
x265 3.4
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 42.12 |===========================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: go
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 380 |=============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: 2to3
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 466 |=============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: chaos
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 171 |=============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: float
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 173 |=============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: nbody
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 198 |=============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: pathlib
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 26.3 |============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: raytrace
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 771 |=============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: json_loads
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 37.4 |============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: crypto_pyaes
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 168 |=============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: regex_compile
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 264 |=============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: python_startup
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 11.1 |============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: django_template
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 83.6 |============================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: pickle_pure_python
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 672 |=============================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Atol
Seconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 81.00 |===========================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Ctype
Seconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 37.06 |===========================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Math Library
Seconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 456.47 |==========================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Random Numbers
Seconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 1235.75 |=========================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Stepanov Vector
Seconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 104.55 |==========================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Function Objects
Seconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 16.57 |===========================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Stepanov Abstraction
Seconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 41.04 |===========================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.38
Operation: Swirl
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 248 |=============================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.38
Operation: Rotate
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 571 |=============================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.38
Operation: Sharpen
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 102 |=============================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.38
Operation: Enhanced
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 161 |=============================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.38
Operation: Resizing
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 719 |=============================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.38
Operation: Noise-Gaussian
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 141 |=============================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.38
Operation: HWB Color Space
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 640 |=============================================================
Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 14.15 |===========================================================
Stockfish 15
Total Time
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 18895449 |========================================================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 91.28 |===========================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 570.31 |==========================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 122.32 |==========================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 253.66 |==========================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 650.68 |==========================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 807.68 |==========================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
c5.4xlarge . 1017.21 |=========================================================