ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk: Processor: 4 x Intel Xeon Gold 6240 (7 Cores), Motherboard: Intel 440BX (VMW71.00V.21100432.B64.2301110304 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440BX/ZX/DX, Memory: 1 x 16 GB DRAM VMW-16384MB, Disk: 112GB Virtual disk + 558GB Virtual disk, Graphics: VMware SVGA II, Network: VMware VMXNET3 OS: Oracle Linux Server 9.2, Kernel: 5.14.0-284.25.1.0.1.el9_2.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 11.3.1 20221121, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: VMware PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 4172.20 |====================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1277 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 4894.30 |====================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1065 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 6.756 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 7463 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 22.14 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 22764 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 7602.78 |====================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 669 |========================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 4.021 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 25433 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 188.45 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 4278 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 350.05 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 3381 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 13.77 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 7742 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 212.38 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 4832 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 12.82 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 20710 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 32.21 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 17650 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 7292.34 |====================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 686 |========================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 65.53 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 15479 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 78.03 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 6591 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 40.80 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 6589 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 140.02 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 5810 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2.937 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 20760 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 67.26 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 15402 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 77.59 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 6495 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 56.89 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 5256 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 13.16 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 7699 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1.409 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 730 |========================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2.119 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 23713 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 11.59 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 21583 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 45.27 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 17718 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2.353 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 426 |========================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 9.099 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 6024 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 51.91 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 16292 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1.442 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 694 |========================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 5.482 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 24305 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2.254 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 468 |========================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 4910.80 |====================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1041 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.338 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 3112 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 6.025 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 8852 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 36.93 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 7130 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 32.89 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 25116 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 986.89 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 5118 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2364.81 |====================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2137 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 7.388 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 13546 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 13.62 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 8216 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 8.946 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 112365 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 6.792 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 147401 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 219.64 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1144 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1.471 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 170244 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.548 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 182653 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.252 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 198645 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.650 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1567 |========================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Mutex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 636747.91 |==================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2.152 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 26057 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 45.59 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 21960 |======================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 85.35 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 6.761 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 8424 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1572.94 |====================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 515 |========================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 74.28 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1362 |========================================= Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 8497.8 |======================================= Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 5417.6 |======================================= RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 359622 |======================================= Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 299.38 |======================================= Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 277.97 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 117.91 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 6788 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 70.88 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 70583 |======================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 65.46 |======================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1135 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 154.30 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 6482 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1.602 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 62445 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 64.60 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 7741 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.975 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1026 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 14.12 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 35425 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 5.058 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 49428 |======================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Sched Pipe ops/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 109628 |======================================= BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock ns < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 34.6 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 181.60 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 5509 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1.736 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 144114 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 127.20 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 6292 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.731 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1369 |========================================= Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 us < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 20.42 |======================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 15498 |======================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 us < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 20.09 |======================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 18658 |======================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1105673720 |=================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 8303894073 |=================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 14449893103 |================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 19424740330 |================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 16220127687 |================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1244080073 |=================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 41.83 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 53379.50 |===================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 94 |=========================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 6437.55 |====================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 777 |========================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 31.21 |======================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Epoll Wait ops/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 299753 |======================================= Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 152.94 |======================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 237.87 |======================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Futex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 497791.35 |==================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2902756.33 |=================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1651.92 |====================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 4865551.46 |=================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 16889 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 6.956 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 115034 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 3.888 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 128629 |======================================= Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 141.41 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 62.31 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 8024 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 23.88 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 10473 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.034 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 29732 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.616 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 162463 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.280 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 178944 |======================================= RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 496099 |======================================= BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock ticket_spinlock ns < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 25.2 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2214.23 |====================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 452 |========================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 610.28 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 819 |========================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.03 |========================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 33333 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 5.344 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 149754 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 3.211 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 155758 |======================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 43.98 |======================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1137 |========================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 466816.15 |==================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1420022.39 |=================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 4360.75 |====================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 4 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 32406.41 |===================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 30194.49 |===================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 30336.11 |===================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 31586.53 |===================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 31979.96 |===================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 28550.53 |===================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 5062.78 |====================================== SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 79.42 |======================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 72.70 |======================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.1226 |======================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.0980 |======================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.1231 |======================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.0971 |======================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.1216 |======================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.0972 |======================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.0535 |======================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.0536 |======================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.0543 |======================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.0503 |======================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.0501 |======================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.0510 |======================================= RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 393365 |======================================= RocksDB 8.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 191199 |======================================= RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 15824453 |===================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 61113.1 |====================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 952.8 |======================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 30970 |======================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 34441 |======================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Memset 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 36.72 |======================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 5854.55 |====================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 53.48 |======================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock pthread_mutex ns < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 17.4 |========================================= PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 5597 |========================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 60.77 |======================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock_amd ns < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 36.4 |========================================= BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 35.4 |========================================= Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 38.41 |======================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 53.09 |======================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 770098 |======================================= Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 264342 |======================================= Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1045106 |====================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 us < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 21.09 |======================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1128944 |====================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 53.29 |======================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 16186 |======================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 43.49 |======================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 us < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 20.99 |======================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Shared Mutex Lock Shared ns < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 31.6 |========================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Cloning Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1711.30 |====================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 597727.78 |==================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 14.33 |======================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Mixed Scheduler Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 4247.76 |====================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Zlib Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 149.54 |======================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Hash Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 424133.07 |==================================== Schbench 2021-09-09 Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 14635 |======================================== Schbench 2021-09-09 Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 90.0th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 11 |=========================================== Schbench 2021-09-09 Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 75.0th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 8 |============================================ Schbench 2021-09-09 Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 50.0th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 4 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Pthread Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 37560.84 |===================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 82.84 |======================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Fused Multiply-Add Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 3159944.19 |=================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Poll Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 217027.41 |==================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Function Call Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2061.35 |====================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 5532.99 |====================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Shuffle Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1985.61 |====================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 987.31 |======================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 556.64 |======================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Matrix 3D Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1336.26 |====================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 57.90 |======================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2918305.69 |=================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Wide Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 116135.85 |==================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: x86_64 RdRand Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 116948.20 |==================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: AVX-512 VNNI Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 215737.20 |==================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 8855.53 |====================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 12765.43 |===================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 63807.43 |===================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: AVL Tree Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 39.68 |======================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 10155.25 |===================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 5868.83 |====================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Pipe Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2149494.52 |=================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Lock-Pi ops/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 3699 |========================================= perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Hash ops/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 4556927 |====================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 57967 |======================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Memcpy 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 16.23 |======================================== OSBench Test: Launch Programs us Per Event < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 202.16 |======================================= BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Semaphore Release And Acquire ns < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 22.3 |========================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1331154 |====================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 23.99 |======================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 4386.17 |====================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 22.80 |======================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 21.80 |======================================== OSBench Test: Create Processes us Per Event < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 48.41 |======================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 19.2 |========================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 5058.53 |====================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2473935 |====================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2549304 |====================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2633409 |====================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2650138 |====================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 39209 |======================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 6400 |========================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 67.1 |========================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 33.6 |========================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 31981 |======================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 3200 |========================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1.05 |========================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1000 |========================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 100 |========================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 4362.62 |====================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 752183 |======================================= perf-bench Benchmark: Syscall Basic ops/sec > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 8696516 |====================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 22.62 |======================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 21.45 |======================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 20.6 |========================================= IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 953394 |======================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 5072.13 |====================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 880733 |======================================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 884115 |======================================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2627051 |====================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 997509 |======================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1077626 |====================================== OSBench Test: Create Threads us Per Event < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 25.70 |======================================== OSBench Test: Create Files us Per Event < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 24.70 |======================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 500138 |======================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1156384 |====================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1348185 |====================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1195063 |====================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 7.360 |======================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1246677 |====================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1343305 |====================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1741306 |====================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1947502 |====================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2067280 |====================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2157489 |====================================== OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 121.97 |======================================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1903963 |====================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 1979618 |====================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2707544 |====================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 3.191 |======================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 4360.98 |====================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 4868.62 |====================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2.359 |======================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2347.98 |====================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 0.2 |========================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 2.410 |======================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 22.19 |======================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 19.9 |========================================= LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 22.20 |======================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 19.9 |========================================= ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better ol92-rhck-ituietst311-bigdisk . 258 |========================================== WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test Seconds < Lower Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: IO_uring