20231227.txt AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS testing with a Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment F7BSC (1.07 BIOS) and AMD Radeon PRO W6800 30GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. AMD Radeon PRO W6800: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment F7BSC (1.07 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14e8, Memory: 56GB, Disk: 4097GB HP SSD FX900 Pro 4TB + 1024GB KINGSTON OM8PGP41024Q-A0, Graphics: AMD Radeon PRO W6800 30GB, Audio: AMD Navi 21 HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL U2412M, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel I210 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-39-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.56), OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3602.0), Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 12.1.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Lulesh OpenCL 2017-07-06 z/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 2016.39 |=============================================== LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 142184 |================================================ LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Microphone Score > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 111531 |================================================ LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 142986 |================================================ LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Microphone Score > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 112279 |================================================ LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Hotel Score > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 19205 |================================================= LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Hotel Score > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 19365 |================================================= Darktable 3.8.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1.105 |================================================= Darktable 3.8.1 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 0.452 |================================================= Darktable 3.8.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 3.573 |================================================= Darktable 3.8.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 2.829 |================================================= ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1010 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 989 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1020 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 998 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-T GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 465 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-N GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 142 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 350 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 355 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 325 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 490 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 725 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 495 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 50.4 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 52.6 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 47.1 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 48.2 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-T GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 42.3 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-N GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 41.5 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 42.1 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 56.5 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 37.7 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 45.4 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 65.2 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 43.5 |================================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueWriteBuffer GBPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 21.49 |================================================= clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueReadBuffer GBPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 5.10 |================================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Compute GFLOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 16882.56 |============================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Compute GFLOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1172.89 |=============================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth GBPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 368.32 |================================================ clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Integer 24-bit Compute GIOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 14797.68 |============================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Integer Compute GIOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 3655.35 |=============================================== FluidX3D 2.9 Test: FP32-FP16S MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 5346 |================================================== FluidX3D 2.9 Test: FP32-FP16C MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 5196 |================================================== FluidX3D 2.9 Test: FP32-FP32 MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 3428 |================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 917.98 |================================================ SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1.8570 |================================================ SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1.9976 |================================================ SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N GFLOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 6122.47 |=============================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 575.99 |================================================ SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash GHash/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 24.30 |================================================= SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP GFLOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1472.83 |=============================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1.9015 |================================================ SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D GFLOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 83.39 |================================================= OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06 Test: Cyclic Redundancy Check ms < Lower Is Better OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06 Test: Compressed Sparse Row ms < Lower Is Better OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06 Test: LU Decomposition ms < Lower Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Microphone Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Hotel Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Microphone Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Hotel Score > Higher Is Better SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT - Scene: Caustic3 Samples/sec > Higher Is Better SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT - Scene: Cornell Samples/sec > Higher Is Better SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT - Scene: Caustic Samples/sec > Higher Is Better MandelGPU 1.3pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT Samples/sec > Higher Is Better MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT Samples/sec > Higher Is Better JuliaGPU 1.2pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT Samples/sec > Higher Is Better Xsbench OpenCL 2017-07-06 Lookups/s > Higher Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Particle Filter Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Heartwall Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Myocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL TPACF Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL Histo Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL BFS Seconds < Lower Is Better clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Kernel Latency us < Lower Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 21.84 |================================================= cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Write cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Read cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Copy SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops GFLOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 10629233 |==============================================