20231222um79064thunderbolt.txt
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS testing with a Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment F7BSC (1.07 BIOS) and AMD Radeon PRO W6800 8GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


AMD Radeon PRO W6800: 

	Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment F7BSC (1.07 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14e8, Memory: 56GB, Disk: 4097GB HP SSD FX900 Pro 4TB + 1024GB KINGSTON OM8PGP41024Q-A0, Graphics: AMD Radeon PRO W6800 8GB (2555/1000MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 21 HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL ST2210, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel I210 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411

	OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-39-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.56), OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3602.0), Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080


cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Copy
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 326.9 |=================================================


cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Read
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 413.5 |=================================================


cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Write
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 369.7 |=================================================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Kernel Latency
us < Lower Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 19.26 |=================================================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Integer Compute
GIOPS > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 3654.24 |===============================================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Integer 24-bit Compute
GIOPS > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 15708.24 |==============================================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth
GBPS > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 373.03 |================================================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Compute
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1172.37 |===============================================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Compute
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 17191.60 |==============================================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueReadBuffer
GBPS > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 4.99 |==================================================


clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueWriteBuffer
GBPS > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 21.56 |=================================================


Darktable 3.8.1
Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 2.829 |=================================================


Darktable 3.8.1
Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 3.626 |=================================================


Darktable 3.8.1
Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 0.447 |=================================================


Darktable 3.8.1
Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1.099 |=================================================


FluidX3D 2.9
Test: FP32-FP32
MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 3406 |==================================================


FluidX3D 2.9
Test: FP32-FP16C
MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 5166 |==================================================


FluidX3D 2.9
Test: FP32-FP16S
MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 5376 |==================================================


JuliaGPU 1.2pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better


Lulesh OpenCL 2017-07-06

z/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1952.29 |===============================================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Hotel
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Hotel
Score > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 19388 |=================================================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Hotel
Score > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 19317 |=================================================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Microphone
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Microphone
Score > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 112563 |================================================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 143110 |================================================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Hotel
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Microphone
Score > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 111311 |================================================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 142214 |================================================


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Microphone
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better


MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better


MandelGPU 1.3pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better


OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06
Test: LU Decomposition
ms < Lower Is Better


OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06
Test: Compressed Sparse Row
ms < Lower Is Better


OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06
Test: Cyclic Redundancy Check
ms < Lower Is Better


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL BFS
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL LBM
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL Histo
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL TPACF
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL MRI Gridding
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL LavaMD
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Myocyte
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 9.679 |=================================================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Heartwall
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Leukocyte
Seconds < Lower Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 3.775 |=================================================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Particle Filter
Seconds < Lower Is Better


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 95.95 |=================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1.9084 |================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1469.88 |===============================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash
GHash/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 24.22 |=================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 589.72 |================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 4847.52 |===============================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 28075778 |==============================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1.9972 |================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1.8595 |================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 913.65 |================================================


SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Scene: Caustic
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1703273562 |============================================


SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Scene: Cornell
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1703273699 |============================================


SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Scene: Caustic3
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1703273839 |============================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - sCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 43.1 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - sAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 64.7 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - sDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 45.7 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 37.7 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 56.6 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 42.1 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-N
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 41.5 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 48.3 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 47.4 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 52.8 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 50.6 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - sCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 511 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - sAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 737 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - sDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 497 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 326 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 359 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 346 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-N
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 140 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-T
GB/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 469 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 972 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1010 |==================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 941 |===================================================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 991 |===================================================


Xsbench OpenCL 2017-07-06

Lookups/s > Higher Is Better