20231222um79064thunderbolt.txt AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS testing with a Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment F7BSC (1.07 BIOS) and AMD Radeon PRO W6800 8GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. AMD Radeon PRO W6800: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment F7BSC (1.07 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14e8, Memory: 56GB, Disk: 4097GB HP SSD FX900 Pro 4TB + 1024GB KINGSTON OM8PGP41024Q-A0, Graphics: AMD Radeon PRO W6800 8GB (2555/1000MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 21 HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL ST2210, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel I210 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-39-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.56), OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3602.0), Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops GFLOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 28075778 |============================================== LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Microphone Score > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 112563 |================================================ LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Hotel Score > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 19388 |================================================= clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueWriteBuffer GBPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 21.56 |================================================= LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 143110 |================================================ LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Hotel Score > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 19317 |================================================= LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Microphone Score > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 111311 |================================================ LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 142214 |================================================ SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D GFLOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 95.95 |================================================= FluidX3D 2.9 Test: FP32-FP32 MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 3406 |================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Myocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 9.679 |================================================= SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Scene: Caustic Samples/sec > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1703273562 |============================================ SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Scene: Caustic3 Samples/sec > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1703273839 |============================================ SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Scene: Cornell Samples/sec > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1703273699 |============================================ clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueReadBuffer GBPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 4.99 |================================================== FluidX3D 2.9 Test: FP32-FP16C MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 5166 |================================================== FluidX3D 2.9 Test: FP32-FP16S MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 5376 |================================================== Lulesh OpenCL 2017-07-06 z/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1952.29 |=============================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 50.6 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 52.8 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 47.4 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 48.3 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-N GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 41.5 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 42.1 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 56.6 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 37.7 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 45.7 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 64.7 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 43.1 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 991 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 941 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1010 |================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 972 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-T GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 469 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-N GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 140 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 346 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 359 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 326 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 497 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 737 |=================================================== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 511 |=================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 3.775 |================================================= SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 913.65 |================================================ Darktable 3.8.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 3.626 |================================================= clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Kernel Latency us < Lower Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 19.26 |================================================= Darktable 3.8.1 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 0.447 |================================================= clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth GBPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 373.03 |================================================ Xsbench OpenCL 2017-07-06 Lookups/s > Higher Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1.8595 |================================================ SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1.9972 |================================================ SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N GFLOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 4847.52 |=============================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1.9084 |================================================ Darktable 3.8.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 2.829 |================================================= cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Write GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 369.7 |================================================= cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Read GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 413.5 |================================================= cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Copy GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 326.9 |================================================= clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Compute GFLOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1172.37 |=============================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP GFLOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1469.88 |=============================================== Darktable 3.8.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 1.099 |================================================= clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Integer Compute GIOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 3654.24 |=============================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Compute GFLOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 17191.60 |============================================== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Integer 24-bit Compute GIOPS > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 15708.24 |============================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction GB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 589.72 |================================================ Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Heartwall Seconds < Lower Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash GHash/s > Higher Is Better AMD Radeon PRO W6800 . 24.22 |================================================= LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Hotel Score > Higher Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Microphone Score > Higher Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Particle Filter Seconds < Lower Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL TPACF Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL Histo Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL BFS Seconds < Lower Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Microphone Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Hotel Score > Higher Is Better OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06 Test: Compressed Sparse Row ms < Lower Is Better MandelGPU 1.3pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT Samples/sec > Higher Is Better MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT Samples/sec > Higher Is Better JuliaGPU 1.2pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT Samples/sec > Higher Is Better OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06 Test: Cyclic Redundancy Check ms < Lower Is Better OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06 Test: LU Decomposition ms < Lower Is Better