ol89rhck-ituietst309 ol89rhck-ituietst309 ol89rhck-ituietst309: Processor: 4 x Intel Xeon Gold 6240 (7 Cores), Motherboard: Intel 440BX (VMW71.00V.21100432.B64.2301110304 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440BX/ZX/DX, Memory: 1 x 16 GB DRAM VMW-16384MB, Disk: 223GB Virtual disk + 335GB Virtual disk, Graphics: VMware SVGA II, Network: VMware VMXNET3 OS: OracleServer 8.9, Kernel: 4.18.0-513.5.1.el8_9.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 10.3.1 20210422, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1280x800, System Layer: VMware Schbench 2021-09-09 Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 90.0th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 7269 |================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 19243.02 |============================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 20974.96 |============================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 26310.29 |============================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 27459.58 |============================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 25463.42 |============================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 4 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 18079.33 |============================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 487654 |================================================ RocksDB 8.0 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 510203 |================================================ RocksDB 8.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 184403 |================================================ RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 16706410 |============================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 402428 |================================================ ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 241 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 3080663.00 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 60.73 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 2423504.86 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 5493.29 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Fused Multiply-Add Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 3165568.87 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Wide Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 117523.46 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Mixed Scheduler Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 3881.53 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Shuffle Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1985.92 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 989.18 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Matrix 3D Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1391.49 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 554.95 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: x86_64 RdRand Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 116260.55 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Function Call Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 2074.32 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: AVX-512 VNNI Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 218563.14 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 8108.37 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 13070.80 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 4465303.06 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 5375.50 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 49538.99 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: AVL Tree Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 33.84 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Pthread Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 30884.45 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Cloning Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1796.88 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 563970.93 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 5383.87 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Mutex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 632594.53 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 72.45 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Zlib Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 147.61 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Poll Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 221964.28 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Pipe Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1620619.00 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 69.79 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 20.26 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Hash Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 431352.81 |============================================= BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock ticket_spinlock ns < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 25.5 |================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock pthread_mutex ns < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 21.9 |================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock_amd ns < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 39.8 |================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Semaphore Release And Acquire ns < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 20.5 |================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 26.0 |================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 36.0 |================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock ns < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 37.8 |================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Shared Mutex Lock Shared ns < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 33.2 |================================================== SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 88.03 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 161.45 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 6195 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 120.44 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 6643 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 67.40 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 7423 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 191.47 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 5225 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 30.10 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 26586 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 133.59 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 5990 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 66.25 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 7547 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 13.14 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 76141 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 8.665 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 11572 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 9.632 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 83059 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 5.322 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 93947 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 2.153 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 116099 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.763 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 131121 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 47721.85 |============================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 105 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 2858.02 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 350 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.364 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 137332 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1625.88 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 492 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 71.93 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 69515 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 9.731 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 102785 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.031 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 32206 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 7.198 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 111185 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 4.107 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 121744 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1.790 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 139690 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.634 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 157586 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.313 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 159626 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.608 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1644 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.028 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 36070 |================================================= OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 8405751033 |============================================ OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 15347063260 |=========================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 12794423710 |=========================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 49234.8 |=============================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 742.5 |================================================= OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1265061840 |============================================ OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1115404323 |============================================ Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 310.70 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 156.19 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 79.51 |================================================= Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 41.12 |================================================= Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 322.73 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 21.40 |================================================= Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 160.01 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 11.17 |================================================= Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 80.94 |================================================= Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 41.92 |================================================= Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 22.03 |================================================= Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 11.80 |================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 557063 |================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 719690 |================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 819573 |================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 897145 |================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 938957 |================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 976121 |================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1280261 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1579523 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1728410 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1775043 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1836455 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 851340 |================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1349770 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1652255 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1851560 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1863041 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1904237 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 862604 |================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1210921 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1466228 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1633330 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1703955 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1745066 |=============================================== OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 126.22 |================================================ OSBench Test: Create Processes us Per Event < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 44.18 |================================================= OSBench Test: Create Threads us Per Event < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 26.74 |================================================= OSBench Test: Create Files us Per Event < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 28.78 |================================================= perf-bench Benchmark: Syscall Basic ops/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 9107202 |=============================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Lock-Pi ops/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 3653 |================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Sched Pipe ops/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 76846 |================================================= perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Hash ops/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 4368508 |=============================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Epoll Wait ops/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 278107 |================================================ iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 67.2 |================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 33.6 |================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1.05 |================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 58561 |================================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 37111 |================================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 31983 |================================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 6400 |================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 3200 |================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1000 |================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 100 |=================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 24419 |================================================= Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 874264 |================================================ Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 48.70 |================================================= Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 47.66 |================================================= Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 266405 |================================================ Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 51.40 |================================================= Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 40.58 |================================================= Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 us < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 19.08 |================================================= Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 us < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 18.82 |================================================= Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 us < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 18.14 |================================================= Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 us < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 18.25 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.1218 |================================================ pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.1206 |================================================ pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.1198 |================================================ pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.0529 |================================================ pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.0523 |================================================ pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.0521 |================================================ pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.0501 |================================================ pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.0499 |================================================ pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.0498 |================================================ pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.0967 |================================================ pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.0970 |================================================ pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.0959 |================================================ t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 8.767 |================================================= t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 26.52 |================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 4543.07 |=============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 4500.87 |=============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 4493.86 |=============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 4474.81 |=============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 4436.67 |=============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 4429.21 |=============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 4439.06 |=============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 4504.60 |=============================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 5354.5 |================================================ PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 4807 |================================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 23.25 |================================================= LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 19.0 |================================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 23.97 |================================================= LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 2.688 |================================================= LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1.973 |================================================= LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 24.54 |================================================= LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 18.0 |================================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 23.69 |================================================= LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 18.6 |================================================== Schbench 2021-09-09 Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 23643 |================================================= Schbench 2021-09-09 Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 75.0th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1563 |================================================== Schbench 2021-09-09 Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 50.0th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 6 |===================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 332949 |================================================ RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1543 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1167977.69 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 3528.67 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 503623.39 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: IO_uring Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 6645.43 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 207.27 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Futex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 60953.20 |============================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 8681.20 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 655 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 209.53 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 5100 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 147.43 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 5621 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 3534.40 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1435 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 85.28 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 5931 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 44.90 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 6254 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 84.05 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 13967 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 13.32 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 7752 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 6582.40 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 955 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 43.00 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 19298 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 24.25 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 21602 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 9.071 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 6137 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 13.35 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 21925 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 5.578 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 20792 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 2590.02 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1939 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 43.72 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 5912 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 48.45 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 20713 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 13.80 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 7680 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 5916.85 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 874 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 3.226 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 20100 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 2.752 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 379 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 21.96 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 24583 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 5.924 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 8632 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 9.472 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 28799 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 2.247 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 49538 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1099.32 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 4598 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 28.43 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 8917 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1.543 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 664 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1.382 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 43203 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1.496 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 731 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 6.814 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 8256 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.338 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 3081 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1.175 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 996 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 874.87 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 578 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 341.88 |================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 758 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 84.88 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1196 |================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 43.36 |================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 1187 |================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 13897600615 |=========================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 761931 |================================================ OSBench Test: Launch Programs us Per Event < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 187.82 |================================================ perf-bench Benchmark: Memset 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 37.75 |================================================= perf-bench Benchmark: Memcpy 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 16.51 |================================================= WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test Seconds < Lower Is Better iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 33945 |================================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 38298 |================================================= Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 25399 |================================================= Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 24332 |================================================= Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 22985 |================================================= Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 751382 |================================================ Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 661315 |================================================ Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 8895.3 |================================================ LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 3062.56 |=============================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 0.2 |=================================================== LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ol89rhck-ituietst309 . 2.116 |=================================================