AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core testing with a TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS) and ASPEED 24GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2312177-NE-S5EPYC40C88
s5epyc40c256gbram2468gbvram__
AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core testing with a TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS) and ASPEED 24GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
S5.EPYC40c+256GBRAM+24+6+8GBVRAM:
Processor: AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core @ 3.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 870 + 6707GB iSCSI Disk, Graphics: ASPEED 24GB, Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P4317Q + 4 x S32D850, Network: 2 x Intel X550 + 2 x Intel I210
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.0-14-lowlatency (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Display Driver: NVIDIA, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3590.0) + OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.3.68, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + Clang 16.0.6 + LLVM 16.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
S5.EPYC40c+256GBRAM+24+6+8GBVRAM _:
Processor: AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core @ 3.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 870 + 6707GB iSCSI Disk, Graphics: ASPEED 24GB, Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P4317Q + 4 x S32D850, Network: 2 x Intel X550 + 2 x Intel I210
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.0-14-lowlatency (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Display Driver: NVIDIA, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3590.0) + OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.3.68, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + Clang 16.0.6 + LLVM 16.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
s5epyc40c256gbram2468gbvram__:
Processor: AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core @ 3.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 870 + 6707GB iSCSI Disk, Graphics: ASPEED 24GB, Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P4317Q + 4 x S32D850, Network: 2 x Intel X550 + 2 x Intel I210
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.0-14-lowlatency (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Display Driver: NVIDIA, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3590.0) + OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.3.68, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + Clang 16.0.6 + LLVM 16.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
Apache Cassandra 4.1.3
Test: Writes
Op/s > Higher Is Better
Apache Cassandra 4.1.3
Test: Mixed 1:1
Op/s > Higher Is Better
Apache Cassandra 4.1.3
Test: Mixed 1:3
Op/s > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Open - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Open - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Open - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Create - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Delete - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Open - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Open - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Rename - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Create - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Create - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Delete - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Delete - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Open - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Rename - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Rename - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Create - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Create - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Delete - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Delete - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Rename - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Rename - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Create - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Delete - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: Rename - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: File Status - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: File Status - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: File Status - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: File Status - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: File Status - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache Hadoop 3.3.6
Operation: File Status - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000
Ops per sec > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HBase 2.5.0
Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
Concurrent Requests: 4
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
Concurrent Requests: 20
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
Concurrent Requests: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
Concurrent Requests: 200
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
Concurrent Requests: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
Concurrent Requests: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100
Apache IoTDB 1.2
Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ArrayFire 3.9
Test: Conjugate Gradient OpenCL
Blender 4.0
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Blender 4.0
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Blender 4.0
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
BlogBench 1.1
Test: Read
Final Score > Higher Is Better
BlogBench 1.1
Test: Write
Final Score > Higher Is Better
BRL-CAD 7.36
VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better
cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Copy
cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Read
cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Write
ClickHouse 22.12.3.5
Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better
clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Integer Compute INT
clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Float
clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Double
clpeak 1.1.2
OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 128
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 256
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 512
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 1024
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 128
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 256
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 512
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 128
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 256
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 512
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 128
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 256
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 512
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 128
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 256
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 512
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 1024
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 1024
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 1024
ops/s > Higher Is Better
CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 1024
ops/s > Higher Is Better
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100
DuckDB 0.9.1
Benchmark: IMDB
Seconds < Lower Is Better
DuckDB 0.9.1
Benchmark: TPC-H Parquet
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ebizzy 0.3
Records/s > Higher Is Better
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
FAHBench 2.3.2
Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better
FinanceBench 2016-07-25
Benchmark: Black-Scholes OpenCL
ms < Lower Is Better
Git
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Hashcat 6.2.4
Benchmark: MD5
H/s > Higher Is Better
Hashcat 6.2.4
Benchmark: SHA1
H/s > Higher Is Better
Hashcat 6.2.4
Benchmark: 7-Zip
H/s > Higher Is Better
Hashcat 6.2.4
Benchmark: SHA-512
H/s > Higher Is Better
Hashcat 6.2.4
Benchmark: TrueCrypt RIPEMD160 + XTS
H/s > Higher Is Better
Himeno Benchmark 3.0
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
InfluxDB 1.8.2
Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000
val/sec > Higher Is Better
InfluxDB 1.8.2
Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000
val/sec > Higher Is Better
InfluxDB 1.8.2
Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000
val/sec > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 900
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 900
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 50
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 900
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 900
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 900
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
KeyDB 6.3.2
Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 900
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
LeelaChessZero 0.28
Backend: OpenCL
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
LevelDB 1.23
Benchmark: Hot Read
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
LevelDB 1.23
Benchmark: Fill Sync
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
LevelDB 1.23
Benchmark: Overwrite
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
LevelDB 1.23
Benchmark: Random Fill
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
LevelDB 1.23
Benchmark: Random Read
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
LevelDB 1.23
Benchmark: Seek Random
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
LevelDB 1.23
Benchmark: Random Delete
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
LevelDB 1.23
Benchmark: Sequential Fill
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: GPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: GPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: GPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: GPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: GPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
MandelGPU 1.3pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 11.0.1
Clients: 1
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 11.0.1
Clients: 64
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 11.0.1
Clients: 128
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 11.0.1
Clients: 256
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 11.0.1
Clients: 512
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 11.0.1
Clients: 1024
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 11.0.1
Clients: 2048
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 11.0.1
Clients: 4096
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
MariaDB 11.0.1
Clients: 8192
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Add - Connections: 1
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Add - Connections: 4
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Get - Connections: 1
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Get - Connections: 4
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Set - Connections: 1
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Set - Connections: 4
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Add - Connections: 16
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Add - Connections: 32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Add - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Get - Connections: 16
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Get - Connections: 32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Get - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Set - Connections: 16
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Set - Connections: 32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Set - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Add - Connections: 128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Add - Connections: 256
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Get - Connections: 128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Get - Connections: 256
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Set - Connections: 128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Set - Connections: 256
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Append - Connections: 1
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Append - Connections: 4
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Delete - Connections: 1
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Delete - Connections: 4
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Append - Connections: 16
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Append - Connections: 32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Append - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Delete - Connections: 16
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Delete - Connections: 32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Delete - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Prepend - Connections: 1
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Prepend - Connections: 4
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Replace - Connections: 1
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Replace - Connections: 4
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Append - Connections: 128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Append - Connections: 256
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Delete - Connections: 128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Delete - Connections: 256
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Prepend - Connections: 16
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Prepend - Connections: 32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Prepend - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Replace - Connections: 16
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Replace - Connections: 32
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Replace - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Prepend - Connections: 128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Prepend - Connections: 256
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Replace - Connections: 128
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Memcached mcperf 1.6.9
Method: Replace - Connections: 256
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Mixbench 2020-06-23
Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Integer
Mixbench 2020-06-23
Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Double Precision
Mixbench 2020-06-23
Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Single Precision
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU
ms < Lower Is Better
NeatBench 5
Acceleration: GPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 1
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 20
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 200
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 4000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Node.js Express HTTP Load Test
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark
runs/s > Higher Is Better
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: SHA256
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: SHA512
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: RSA4096
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: ChaCha20
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: AES-128-GCM
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: AES-256-GCM
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305
Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP CUTCP
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Perl Benchmarks
Test: Pod2html
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Perl Benchmarks
Test: Interpreter
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PHP Micro Benchmarks
Test: Zend bench
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PHP Micro Benchmarks
Test: Zend micro_bench
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PHPBench 0.8.1
Score > Higher Is Better
PlaidML
FP16: No - Mode: Training - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL
Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better
PlaidML
FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: IMDB LSTM - Device: OpenCL
Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better
PlaidML
FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL
Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better
PlaidML
FP16: Yes - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL
Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better
PlaidML
FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: DenseNet 201 - Device: OpenCL
Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
Redis 7.0.4
Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50
Redis 7.0.4
Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50
Redis 7.0.4
Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500
Redis 7.0.4
Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50
Redis 7.0.4
Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50
Redis 7.0.4
Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500
Redis 7.0.4
Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000
Redis 7.0.4
Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500
Redis 7.0.4
Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50
Redis 7.0.4
Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500
Redis 7.0.4
Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000
Redis 7.0.4
Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000
Redis 7.0.4
Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500
Redis 7.0.4
Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000
Redis 7.0.4
Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000
RedShift Demo 3.0
Seconds < Lower Is Better
RocksDB 8.0
Test: Random Fill
Op/s > Higher Is Better
RocksDB 8.0
Test: Random Read
Op/s > Higher Is Better
RocksDB 8.0
Test: Update Random
Op/s > Higher Is Better
RocksDB 8.0
Test: Sequential Fill
Op/s > Higher Is Better
RocksDB 8.0
Test: Random Fill Sync
Op/s > Higher Is Better
RocksDB 8.0
Test: Read While Writing
Op/s > Higher Is Better
RocksDB 8.0
Test: Read Random Write Random
Op/s > Higher Is Better
Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP LavaMD
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP CFD Solver
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Particle Filter
Seconds < Lower Is Better
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth
simdjson 2.0
Throughput Test: Kostya
GB/s > Higher Is Better
simdjson 2.0
Throughput Test: TopTweet
GB/s > Higher Is Better
simdjson 2.0
Throughput Test: LargeRandom
GB/s > Higher Is Better
simdjson 2.0
Throughput Test: PartialTweets
GB/s > Higher Is Better
simdjson 2.0
Throughput Test: DistinctUserID
GB/s > Higher Is Better
SQLite 3.30.1
Threads / Copies: 1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
SQLite Speedtest 3.30
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Swet 1.5.16
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Sysbench 1.0.20
Test: Memory
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
Sysbench 1.0.20
Test: CPU
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
x265 3.4
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
x265 3.4
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 0
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 1
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 16
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 32
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 256
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 128
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 256