s5epyc40c256gbram2468gbvram__

AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core testing with a TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS) and ASPEED 24GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2312177-NE-S5EPYC40C88
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

BLAS (Basic Linear Algebra Sub-Routine) Tests 2 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 10 Tests
CPU Massive 21 Tests
Creator Workloads 5 Tests
Database Test Suite 19 Tests
Go Language Tests 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 8 Tests
Java Tests 6 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 6 Tests
Machine Learning 4 Tests
Multi-Core 13 Tests
Node.js + NPM Tests 2 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 18 Tests
OpenCL 7 Tests
OpenMPI Tests 2 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 5 Tests
Python Tests 4 Tests
Renderers 2 Tests
Scientific Computing 2 Tests
Server 32 Tests
Server CPU Tests 9 Tests
Single-Threaded 7 Tests
Common Workstation Benchmarks 9 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
S5.EPYC40c+256GBRAM+24+6+8GBVRAM
December 16 2023
  1 Minute
S5.EPYC40c+256GBRAM+24+6+8GBVRAM _
December 16 2023
  1 Minute
s5epyc40c256gbram2468gbvram__
December 16 2023
  1 Minute
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  1 Minute

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

s5epyc40c256gbram2468gbvram__ AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core testing with a TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS) and ASPEED 24GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. S5.EPYC40c+256GBRAM+24+6+8GBVRAM: Processor: AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core @ 3.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 870 + 6707GB iSCSI Disk, Graphics: ASPEED 24GB, Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P4317Q + 4 x S32D850, Network: 2 x Intel X550 + 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.0-14-lowlatency (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Display Driver: NVIDIA, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3590.0) + OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.3.68, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + Clang 16.0.6 + LLVM 16.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 S5.EPYC40c+256GBRAM+24+6+8GBVRAM _: Processor: AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core @ 3.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 870 + 6707GB iSCSI Disk, Graphics: ASPEED 24GB, Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P4317Q + 4 x S32D850, Network: 2 x Intel X550 + 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.0-14-lowlatency (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Display Driver: NVIDIA, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3590.0) + OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.3.68, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + Clang 16.0.6 + LLVM 16.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 s5epyc40c256gbram2468gbvram__: Processor: AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core @ 3.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 870 + 6707GB iSCSI Disk, Graphics: ASPEED 24GB, Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P4317Q + 4 x S32D850, Network: 2 x Intel X550 + 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.0-14-lowlatency (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Display Driver: NVIDIA, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3590.0) + OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.3.68, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + Clang 16.0.6 + LLVM 16.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 4 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better ArrayFire 3.9 Test: Conjugate Gradient OpenCL Blender 4.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better BRL-CAD 7.36 VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Copy cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Read cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Write ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Integer Compute INT clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Float clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Double clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 DuckDB 0.9.1 Benchmark: IMDB Seconds < Lower Is Better DuckDB 0.9.1 Benchmark: TPC-H Parquet Seconds < Lower Is Better ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better FAHBench 2.3.2 Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Black-Scholes OpenCL ms < Lower Is Better Git Seconds < Lower Is Better Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: MD5 H/s > Higher Is Better Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: SHA1 H/s > Higher Is Better Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: 7-Zip H/s > Higher Is Better Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: SHA-512 H/s > Higher Is Better Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: TrueCrypt RIPEMD160 + XTS H/s > Higher Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: OpenCL Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better MandelGPU 1.3pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU Samples/sec > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 1024 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 2048 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 4096 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 8192 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Integer Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Double Precision Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Single Precision NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU ms < Lower Is Better NeatBench 5 Acceleration: GPU FPS > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 4000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 Score > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Training - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: IMDB LSTM - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: Yes - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: DenseNet 201 - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 RedShift Demo 3.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Particle Filter Seconds < Lower Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Seconds < Lower Is Better Swet 1.5.16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: Memory Events Per Second > Higher Is Better Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS GFLOPS > Higher Is Better ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS GFLOPS > Higher Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 256