s5epyc40c256gbram2468gbvram__ AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core testing with a TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS) and ASPEED 24GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. S5.EPYC40c+256GBRAM+24+6+8GBVRAM: Processor: AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core @ 3.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 870 + 6707GB iSCSI Disk, Graphics: ASPEED 24GB, Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P4317Q + 4 x S32D850, Network: 2 x Intel X550 + 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.0-14-lowlatency (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Display Driver: NVIDIA, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3590.0) + OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.3.68, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + Clang 16.0.6 + LLVM 16.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 S5.EPYC40c+256GBRAM+24+6+8GBVRAM _: Processor: AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core @ 3.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 870 + 6707GB iSCSI Disk, Graphics: ASPEED 24GB, Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P4317Q + 4 x S32D850, Network: 2 x Intel X550 + 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.0-14-lowlatency (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Display Driver: NVIDIA, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3590.0) + OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.3.68, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + Clang 16.0.6 + LLVM 16.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 s5epyc40c256gbram2468gbvram__: Processor: AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core @ 3.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S8030GM4NE-2T (V1.00 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 870 + 6707GB iSCSI Disk, Graphics: ASPEED 24GB, Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P4317Q + 4 x S32D850, Network: 2 x Intel X550 + 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.0-14-lowlatency (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Display Driver: NVIDIA, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3590.0) + OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.3.68, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + Clang 16.0.6 + LLVM 16.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 1000 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 500 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 1000 - Files: 10000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 2000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 500 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 4 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better ArrayFire 3.9 Test: Conjugate Gradient OpenCL Blender 4.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better BRL-CAD 7.36 VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Copy cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Read cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Write ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Integer Compute INT clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Float clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Double clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 DuckDB 0.9.1 Benchmark: IMDB Seconds < Lower Is Better DuckDB 0.9.1 Benchmark: TPC-H Parquet Seconds < Lower Is Better ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better FAHBench 2.3.2 Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Black-Scholes OpenCL ms < Lower Is Better Git Seconds < Lower Is Better Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: MD5 H/s > Higher Is Better Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: SHA1 H/s > Higher Is Better Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: 7-Zip H/s > Higher Is Better Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: SHA-512 H/s > Higher Is Better Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: TrueCrypt RIPEMD160 + XTS H/s > Higher Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: HMSET - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better KeyDB 6.3.2 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 900 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: OpenCL Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better MandelGPU 1.3pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU Samples/sec > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 1024 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 2048 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 4096 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 8192 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Integer Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Double Precision Mixbench 2020-06-23 Backend: OpenCL - Benchmark: Single Precision NCNN 20230517 Target: Vulkan GPU ms < Lower Is Better NeatBench 5 Acceleration: GPU FPS > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 4000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 Score > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Training - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: IMDB LSTM - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: Yes - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: DenseNet 201 - Device: OpenCL Examples Per Second > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 RedShift Demo 3.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Particle Filter Seconds < Lower Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Seconds < Lower Is Better Swet 1.5.16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: Memory Events Per Second > Higher Is Better Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS GFLOPS > Higher Is Better ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS GFLOPS > Higher Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 1 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 16 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 32 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 256 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 128 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 256 - Num Threads Read: 256