ddd

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS) and NVIDIA NV174 8GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2312033-PTS-DDD3337461
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Audio Encoding 2 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 3 Tests
CPU Massive 5 Tests
Creator Workloads 6 Tests
Encoding 3 Tests
Java 2 Tests
Multi-Core 4 Tests
Python Tests 2 Tests
Server CPU Tests 2 Tests
Single-Threaded 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
a
November 27 2023
  1 Hour, 38 Minutes
b
November 27 2023
  1 Hour, 38 Minutes
s
December 03 2023
  2 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  1 Hour, 6 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

ddd AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS) and NVIDIA NV174 8GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core @ 5.88GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14d8, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2000GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB, Graphics: AMD Radeon 16GB (2124/1218MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 31 HDMI/DP, Monitor: DELL U2723QE, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411 OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.6.0-phx-bcachefs (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.54), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + LLVM 16.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 b: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core @ 5.88GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14d8, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2000GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB, Graphics: AMD Radeon 16GB (2124/1218MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 31 HDMI/DP, Monitor: DELL U2723QE, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411 OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.6.0-phx-bcachefs (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.54), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + LLVM 16.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 s: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core @ 5.88GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14d8, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2000GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB + 4001GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 4000GB, Graphics: NVIDIA NV174 8GB, Audio: NVIDIA GA104 HD Audio, Monitor: DELL U2723QE, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411 OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.7.0-060700rc2daily20231127-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7 + Wayland, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 24.0~git2311260600.945288~oibaf~m (git-945288f 2023-11-26 mantic-oibaf-ppa), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0 + LLVM 16.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Blender 4.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 51.34 |==================================================================== b . 51.33 |==================================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 130.65 |=================================================================== b . 130.74 |=================================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 64.18 |==================================================================== b . 64.00 |==================================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 464.43 |=================================================================== b . 463.31 |=================================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 158.37 |=================================================================== b . 159.01 |=================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better a . 3659 |===================================================================== b . 3608 |==================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Eclipse msec < Lower Is Better a . 7098 |===================================================================== b . 7066 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: GraphChi msec < Lower Is Better a . 2131 |===================================================================== b . 2112 |==================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better a . 2361 |===================================================================== b . 2297 |=================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better a . 3370 |===================================================================== b . 3383 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Spring Boot msec < Lower Is Better a . 1329 |===================================================================== b . 1306 |==================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Kafka msec < Lower Is Better a . 6297 |===================================================================== b . 6299 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Tomcat msec < Lower Is Better a . 3377 |===================================================================== b . 3389 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: jMonkeyEngine msec < Lower Is Better a . 6806 |===================================================================== b . 6809 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Cassandra msec < Lower Is Better a . 5442 |===================================================================== b . 5473 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT msec < Lower Is Better a . 469 |====================================================================== b . 461 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit msec < Lower Is Better a . 1009 |===================================================================== b . 985 |=================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2 Database Engine msec < Lower Is Better a . 1721 |===================================================================== b . 1667 |=================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: FOP Print Formatter msec < Lower Is Better a . 407 |====================================================================== b . 382 |================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer msec < Lower Is Better a . 1104 |================================================================= b . 1168 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index msec < Lower Is Better a . 2526 |=================================================================== b . 2614 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine msec < Lower Is Better a . 1223 |=================================================================== b . 1267 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework msec < Lower Is Better a . 3030 |=================================================================== b . 3100 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework msec < Lower Is Better a . 4376 |===================================================================== b . 4333 |==================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing msec < Lower Is Better a . 616 |===================================================================== b . 621 |====================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2O In-Memory Platform For Machine Learning msec < Lower Is Better a . 2278 |================================================================== b . 2383 |===================================================================== Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 32.84 |==================================================================== b . 32.67 |==================================================================== Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 33.80 |==================================================================== b . 33.76 |==================================================================== Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 33.18 |==================================================================== b . 32.95 |==================================================================== Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 29.34 |==================================================================== b . 29.23 |==================================================================== Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 35.10 |==================================================================== b . 34.97 |==================================================================== Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 29.91 |==================================================================== b . 29.86 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better a . 308.92 |=================================================================== b . 307.75 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better a . 189.62 |================================================================== b . 193.02 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better a . 18.21 |=================================================================== b . 18.52 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better a . 36.72 |==================================================================== b . 36.77 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better a . 70.58 |==================================================================== b . 70.50 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better a . 75.33 |==================================================================== b . 74.81 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better a . 70.72 |==================================================================== b . 70.75 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better a . 75.21 |==================================================================== b . 75.16 |==================================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better s . 11.68 |==================================================================== Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better a . 5660.58 |================================================================== b . 5653.55 |================================================================== Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better a . 2346.34 |================================================================== b . 2351.47 |================================================================== Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better a . 470.52 |=================================================================== b . 471.56 |=================================================================== Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better a . 3936.57 |================================================================== b . 3912.13 |================================================================== Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better a . 18996.73 |================================================================= b . 18979.83 |================================================================= Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better a . 2552.76 |================================================================== b . 2552.76 |================================================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better s . 4.734 |==================================================================== OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 36100491030 |============================================================== b . 36172449040 |============================================================== OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 11690406590 |============================================================== b . 11681461040 |============================================================== OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better a . 15089.6 |================================================================== b . 15061.3 |================================================================== OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better a . 393292.9 |================================================================= b . 393267.4 |================================================================= OpenSSL Algorithm: ChaCha20 OpenSSL Algorithm: AES-128-GCM OpenSSL Algorithm: AES-256-GCM OpenSSL Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 75.01 |================================================================== b . 76.74 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 30.99 |==================================================================== b . 30.35 |=================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 50.05 |==================================================================== b . 49.83 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 50.23 |==================================================================== b . 50.30 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 50.66 |==================================================================== b . 50.39 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 20.96 |==================================================================== b . 20.93 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 50.38 |==================================================================== b . 50.29 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 20.79 |==================================================================== b . 20.10 |================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 49.51 |=================================================================== b . 50.34 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 20.46 |=================================================================== b . 20.87 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 20.90 |==================================================================== b . 20.38 |================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-152 batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 20.82 |==================================================================== b . 20.93 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 16.43 |=================================================================== b . 16.56 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 12.62 |==================================================================== b . 12.56 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 12.63 |==================================================================== b . 12.62 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 12.70 |==================================================================== b . 12.41 |================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 12.67 |==================================================================== b . 12.63 |==================================================================== PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: Efficientnet_v2_l batches/sec > Higher Is Better a . 12.76 |==================================================================== b . 12.58 |=================================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 22.12 |==================================================================== b . 22.21 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20220823 Encode Settings: Default MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 14.62 |=================================================================== b . 14.82 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20220823 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 0.35 |===================================================================== b . 0.35 |===================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20220823 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 0.17 |===================================================================== b . 0.17 |===================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20220823 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 9.87 |===================================================================== b . 9.79 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20220823 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Compression MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 0.04 |===================================================================== b . 0.04 |=====================================================================