teste05compressaowindows02
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 testing with a Placa-me (4.13 BIOS) and Adaptador de Vdeo Bsico da Microsoft on Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 19045 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4: 

	Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: Placa-me (4.13 BIOS), Memory: 1 x 3372 MB 48MHz, Disk: 71GB XENSRC PVDISK Disk, Graphics: Adaptador de Vdeo Bsico da Microsoft

	OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 19045, Kernel: 10.0.19045.3693 (x86_64), Display Driver: 10.0.19041.3636, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 1024x768


lzbench 1.8
Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 21 |===============================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 72 |===============================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 315 |==============================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 551 |==============================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 50 |===============================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 558 |==============================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 60 |===============================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 322 |==============================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 255 |==============================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 416 |==============================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 67 |===============================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 486 |==============================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 147 |==============================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 874 |==============================================


7-Zip Compression 22.01

MIPS > Higher Is Better


Gzip Compression
Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 6.805 |============================================


XZ Compression 5.2.4
Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 326.36 |===========================================


RAR Compression 6.0.2

Seconds < Lower Is Better