teste05compressaowindows02 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 testing with a Placa-me (4.13 BIOS) and Adaptador de Vdeo Bsico da Microsoft on Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 19045 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: Placa-me (4.13 BIOS), Memory: 1 x 3372 MB 48MHz, Disk: 71GB XENSRC PVDISK Disk, Graphics: Adaptador de Vdeo Bsico da Microsoft OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 19045, Kernel: 10.0.19045.3693 (x86_64), Display Driver: 10.0.19041.3636, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 7-Zip Compression 22.01 MIPS > Higher Is Better Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 6.805 |============================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 21 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 72 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 315 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 551 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 50 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 558 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 60 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 322 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 255 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 416 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 67 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 486 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 147 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 874 |============================================== RAR Compression 6.0.2 Seconds < Lower Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 326.36 |===========================================