Intel Core i7-1065G7 testing with a Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS) and Intel Iris Plus ICL GT2 16GB on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2311164-NE-NEWICE12056 new ice - Phoronix Test Suite new ice Intel Core i7-1065G7 testing with a Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS) and Intel Iris Plus ICL GT2 16GB on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2311164-NE-NEWICE12056&grt&rdt .
new ice Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server OpenGL OpenCL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution a b c Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads) Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS) Intel Ice Lake-LP DRAM 16GB Toshiba KBG40ZPZ512G NVMe 512GB Intel Iris Plus ICL GT2 16GB (1100MHz) Realtek ALC289 Intel Ice Lake-LP PCH CNVi WiFi Ubuntu 23.04 6.2.0-35-generic (x86_64) GNOME Shell 44.3 X Server + Wayland 4.6 Mesa 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1 OpenCL 3.0 GCC 12.3.0 ext4 1920x1200 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-12-DAPbBt/gcc-12-12.3.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-12-DAPbBt/gcc-12-12.3.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v Processor Details - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave (EPP: balance_performance) - CPU Microcode: 0xbc - Thermald 2.5.2 Java Details - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.20.1+1-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu123.04) Python Details - Python 3.11.4 Security Details - gather_data_sampling: Mitigation of Microcode + itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of VMX disabled + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + retbleed: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence + srbds: Mitigation of Microcode + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
new ice arrayfire: BLAS CPU FP16 arrayfire: BLAS CPU FP32 arrayfire: Conjugate Gradient CPU blender: BMW27 - CPU-Only blender: Classroom - CPU-Only blender: Fishy Cat - CPU-Only blender: Pabellon Barcelona - CPU-Only dacapobench: Jython dacapobench: Eclipse dacapobench: GraphChi dacapobench: Tradesoap dacapobench: Tradebeans dacapobench: Spring Boot dacapobench: Apache Kafka dacapobench: Apache Tomcat dacapobench: jMonkeyEngine dacapobench: Apache Cassandra dacapobench: Apache Xalan XSLT dacapobench: Batik SVG Toolkit dacapobench: H2 Database Engine dacapobench: FOP Print Formatter dacapobench: PMD Source Code Analyzer dacapobench: Apache Lucene Search Index dacapobench: Apache Lucene Search Engine dacapobench: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework dacapobench: BioJava Biological Data Framework dacapobench: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing dacapobench: H2O In-Memory Platform For Machine Learning ffmpeg: libx264 - Live ffmpeg: libx265 - Live ffmpeg: libx264 - Upload ffmpeg: libx265 - Upload ffmpeg: libx264 - Platform ffmpeg: libx265 - Platform ffmpeg: libx264 - Video On Demand ffmpeg: libx265 - Video On Demand rabbitmq: Simple 2 Publishers + 4 Consumers rabbitmq: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers rabbitmq: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers rabbitmq: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers rabbitmq: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers rabbitmq: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers rabbitmq: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers rabbitmq: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers rabbitmq: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers build-ffmpeg: Time To Compile a b c 90.5587 384.619 17.82 674.68 1771.34 838.67 2176.15 5694 17045 6748 6059 12149 9189 5823 15682 6934 8915 1684 1678 10328 933 6056 4610 13222 3571 7499 6193 4905 188.90 71.26 10.77 8.48 39.30 17.61 41.37 17.75 71388 37455 37821 38484 39043 30578 30527 33024 33158 231.825 98.7239 372.689 18.1 629.68 1684.97 804.74 2190.13 5575 15762 6819 5858 15356 8514 5600 15279 6965 9159 1900 1614 8852 901 5425 4425 12881 3553 7469 6023 5118 187.37 72.60 11.51 9.99 43.18 18.91 43.30 18.88 74072 40385 40762 41262 41762 31422 31568 35501 35882 216.132 99.418 372.865 18.02 635.92 1694.45 816.11 2282.91 5541 15768 6798 5993 12421 7999 5609 15413 6936 9208 1664 1702 10099 905 5601 4546 12830 3575 7489 5985 5078 184.49 72.85 11.37 9.00 42.62 18.62 42.46 18.61 73884 39254 39892 40124 40627 31404 31463 34580 34853 222.809 OpenBenchmarking.org
ArrayFire Test: BLAS CPU FP16 OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better ArrayFire 3.9 Test: BLAS CPU FP16 a b c 20 40 60 80 100 90.56 98.72 99.42 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
ArrayFire Test: BLAS CPU FP32 OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better ArrayFire 3.9 Test: BLAS CPU FP32 a b c 80 160 240 320 400 384.62 372.69 372.87 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
ArrayFire Test: Conjugate Gradient CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better ArrayFire 3.9 Test: Conjugate Gradient CPU a b c 4 8 12 16 20 17.82 18.10 18.02 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
Blender Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only a b c 150 300 450 600 750 674.68 629.68 635.92
Blender Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only a b c 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1771.34 1684.97 1694.45
Blender Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only a b c 200 400 600 800 1000 838.67 804.74 816.11
Blender Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only a b c 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2176.15 2190.13 2282.91
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Jython OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Jython a b c 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 5694 5575 5541
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Eclipse OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Eclipse a b c 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 17045 15762 15768
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: GraphChi OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: GraphChi a b c 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 6748 6819 6798
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradesoap OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradesoap a b c 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 6059 5858 5993
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradebeans OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradebeans a b c 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 12149 15356 12421
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Spring Boot OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Spring Boot a b c 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 9189 8514 7999
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Kafka OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Kafka a b c 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 5823 5600 5609
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Tomcat OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Tomcat a b c 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 15682 15279 15413
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: jMonkeyEngine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: jMonkeyEngine a b c 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 6934 6965 6936
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Cassandra OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Cassandra a b c 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 8915 9159 9208
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT a b c 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1684 1900 1664
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit a b c 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1678 1614 1702
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: H2 Database Engine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2 Database Engine a b c 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10328 8852 10099
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: FOP Print Formatter OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: FOP Print Formatter a b c 200 400 600 800 1000 933 901 905
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer a b c 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 6056 5425 5601
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index a b c 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 4610 4425 4546
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine a b c 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 13222 12881 12830
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework a b c 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3571 3553 3575
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework a b c 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 7499 7469 7489
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing a b c 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 6193 6023 5985
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: H2O In-Memory Platform For Machine Learning OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2O In-Memory Platform For Machine Learning a b c 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 4905 5118 5078
FFmpeg Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Live OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Live a b c 40 80 120 160 200 188.90 187.37 184.49 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
FFmpeg Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live a b c 16 32 48 64 80 71.26 72.60 72.85 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
FFmpeg Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Upload OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Upload a b c 3 6 9 12 15 10.77 11.51 11.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
FFmpeg Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload a b c 3 6 9 12 15 8.48 9.99 9.00 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
FFmpeg Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Platform OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Platform a b c 10 20 30 40 50 39.30 43.18 42.62 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
FFmpeg Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform a b c 5 10 15 20 25 17.61 18.91 18.62 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
FFmpeg Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Video On Demand OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Video On Demand a b c 10 20 30 40 50 41.37 43.30 42.46 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
FFmpeg Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand a b c 5 10 15 20 25 17.75 18.88 18.61 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
RabbitMQ Scenario: Simple 2 Publishers + 4 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Sending Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: Simple 2 Publishers + 4 Consumers a b c 16K 32K 48K 64K 80K 71388 74072 73884
RabbitMQ Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Sending Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers a b c 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K 37455 40385 39254
RabbitMQ Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Receiving Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers a b c 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K 37821 40762 39892
RabbitMQ Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Sending Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers a b c 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K 38484 41262 40124
RabbitMQ Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Receiving Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers a b c 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K 39043 41762 40627
RabbitMQ Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Sending Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers a b c 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K 30578 31422 31404
RabbitMQ Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Receiving Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers a b c 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K 30527 31568 31463
RabbitMQ Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Sending Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers a b c 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K 33024 35501 34580
RabbitMQ Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Receiving Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers a b c 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K 33158 35882 34853
Timed FFmpeg Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 Time To Compile a b c 50 100 150 200 250 231.83 216.13 222.81
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4