new ice Intel Core i7-1065G7 testing with a Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS) and Intel Iris Plus ICL GT2 16GB on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Ice Lake-LP DRAM, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Toshiba KBG40ZPZ512G NVMe 512GB, Graphics: Intel Iris Plus ICL GT2 16GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Ice Lake-LP PCH CNVi WiFi OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-35-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.3, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Compiler: GCC 12.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 b: Processor: Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Ice Lake-LP DRAM, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Toshiba KBG40ZPZ512G NVMe 512GB, Graphics: Intel Iris Plus ICL GT2 16GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Ice Lake-LP PCH CNVi WiFi OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-35-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.3, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Compiler: GCC 12.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 c: Processor: Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Ice Lake-LP DRAM, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Toshiba KBG40ZPZ512G NVMe 512GB, Graphics: Intel Iris Plus ICL GT2 16GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Ice Lake-LP PCH CNVi WiFi OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-35-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.3, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Compiler: GCC 12.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better a . 188.90 |=================================================================== b . 187.37 |================================================================== c . 184.49 |================================================================= FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better a . 71.26 |=================================================================== b . 72.60 |==================================================================== c . 72.85 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better a . 10.77 |================================================================ b . 11.51 |==================================================================== c . 11.37 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better a . 8.48 |=========================================================== b . 9.99 |===================================================================== c . 9.00 |============================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better a . 39.30 |============================================================== b . 43.18 |==================================================================== c . 42.62 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better a . 17.61 |=============================================================== b . 18.91 |==================================================================== c . 18.62 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better a . 41.37 |================================================================= b . 43.30 |==================================================================== c . 42.46 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better a . 17.75 |================================================================ b . 18.88 |==================================================================== c . 18.61 |=================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better a . 5694 |===================================================================== b . 5575 |==================================================================== c . 5541 |=================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Eclipse msec < Lower Is Better a . 17045 |==================================================================== b . 15762 |=============================================================== c . 15768 |=============================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: GraphChi msec < Lower Is Better a . 6748 |==================================================================== b . 6819 |===================================================================== c . 6798 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better a . 6059 |===================================================================== b . 5858 |=================================================================== c . 5993 |==================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better a . 12149 |====================================================== b . 15356 |==================================================================== c . 12421 |======================================================= DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Spring Boot msec < Lower Is Better a . 9189 |===================================================================== b . 8514 |================================================================ c . 7999 |============================================================ DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Kafka msec < Lower Is Better a . 5823 |===================================================================== b . 5600 |================================================================== c . 5609 |================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Tomcat msec < Lower Is Better a . 15682 |==================================================================== b . 15279 |================================================================== c . 15413 |=================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: jMonkeyEngine msec < Lower Is Better a . 6934 |===================================================================== b . 6965 |===================================================================== c . 6936 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Cassandra msec < Lower Is Better a . 8915 |=================================================================== b . 9159 |===================================================================== c . 9208 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT msec < Lower Is Better a . 1684 |============================================================= b . 1900 |===================================================================== c . 1664 |============================================================ DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit msec < Lower Is Better a . 1678 |==================================================================== b . 1614 |================================================================= c . 1702 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2 Database Engine msec < Lower Is Better a . 10328 |==================================================================== b . 8852 |========================================================== c . 10099 |================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: FOP Print Formatter msec < Lower Is Better a . 933 |====================================================================== b . 901 |==================================================================== c . 905 |==================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer msec < Lower Is Better a . 6056 |===================================================================== b . 5425 |============================================================== c . 5601 |================================================================ DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index msec < Lower Is Better a . 4610 |===================================================================== b . 4425 |================================================================== c . 4546 |==================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine msec < Lower Is Better a . 13222 |==================================================================== b . 12881 |================================================================== c . 12830 |================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework msec < Lower Is Better a . 3571 |===================================================================== b . 3553 |===================================================================== c . 3575 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework msec < Lower Is Better a . 7499 |===================================================================== b . 7469 |===================================================================== c . 7489 |===================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing msec < Lower Is Better a . 6193 |===================================================================== b . 6023 |=================================================================== c . 5985 |=================================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2O In-Memory Platform For Machine Learning msec < Lower Is Better a . 4905 |================================================================== b . 5118 |===================================================================== c . 5078 |==================================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 231.83 |=================================================================== b . 216.13 |============================================================== c . 222.81 |================================================================ ArrayFire 3.9 Test: BLAS CPU FP16 GFLOPS > Higher Is Better a . 90.56 |============================================================== b . 98.72 |==================================================================== c . 99.42 |==================================================================== ArrayFire 3.9 Test: BLAS CPU FP32 GFLOPS > Higher Is Better a . 384.62 |=================================================================== b . 372.69 |================================================================= c . 372.87 |================================================================= ArrayFire 3.9 Test: Conjugate Gradient CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 17.82 |=================================================================== b . 18.10 |==================================================================== c . 18.02 |==================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: Simple 2 Publishers + 4 Consumers Sending Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 71388 |================================================================== b . 74072 |==================================================================== c . 73884 |==================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers Sending Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 37455 |=============================================================== b . 40385 |==================================================================== c . 39254 |================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers Receiving Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 37821 |=============================================================== b . 40762 |==================================================================== c . 39892 |=================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers Sending Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 38484 |=============================================================== b . 41262 |==================================================================== c . 40124 |================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers Receiving Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 39043 |================================================================ b . 41762 |==================================================================== c . 40627 |================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers Sending Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 30578 |================================================================== b . 31422 |==================================================================== c . 31404 |==================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers Receiving Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 30527 |================================================================== b . 31568 |==================================================================== c . 31463 |==================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers Sending Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 33024 |=============================================================== b . 35501 |==================================================================== c . 34580 |================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers Receiving Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 33158 |=============================================================== b . 35882 |==================================================================== c . 34853 |================================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 674.68 |=================================================================== b . 629.68 |=============================================================== c . 635.92 |=============================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1771.34 |================================================================== b . 1684.97 |=============================================================== c . 1694.45 |=============================================================== Blender 4.0 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 838.67 |=================================================================== b . 804.74 |================================================================ c . 816.11 |================================================================= Blender 4.0 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Blender 4.0 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 2176.15 |=============================================================== b . 2190.13 |=============================================================== c . 2282.91 |==================================================================