Intel Core i7-1280P testing with a MSI MS-14C6 (E14C6IMS.115 BIOS) and MSI Intel ADL GT2 15GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2311116-NE-FA705937996 fa - Phoronix Test Suite fa Intel Core i7-1280P testing with a MSI MS-14C6 (E14C6IMS.115 BIOS) and MSI Intel ADL GT2 15GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2311116-NE-FA705937996&sor&grw .
fa Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server OpenGL OpenCL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution a b c Intel Core i7-1280P @ 4.70GHz (14 Cores / 20 Threads) MSI MS-14C6 (E14C6IMS.115 BIOS) Intel Alder Lake PCH 16GB 1024GB Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH MSI Intel ADL GT2 15GB (1450MHz) Realtek ALC274 Intel Alder Lake-P PCH CNVi WiFi Ubuntu 23.10 6.5.0-9-generic (x86_64) GNOME Shell 45.0 X Server + Wayland 4.6 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3 OpenCL 3.0 GCC 13.2.0 ext4 1920x1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise Processor Details - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave (EPP: balance_performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x42c - Thermald 2.5.4 Java Details - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 17.0.9-ea+6-Ubuntu-1) Security Details - gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
fa rabbitmq: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers dacapobench: Jython dacapobench: Eclipse dacapobench: GraphChi dacapobench: Tradesoap dacapobench: Tradebeans dacapobench: Spring Boot dacapobench: Apache Kafka dacapobench: Apache Tomcat dacapobench: jMonkeyEngine dacapobench: Apache Xalan XSLT dacapobench: Batik SVG Toolkit dacapobench: H2 Database Engine dacapobench: FOP Print Formatter dacapobench: PMD Source Code Analyzer dacapobench: Apache Lucene Search Index dacapobench: Apache Lucene Search Engine dacapobench: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework dacapobench: BioJava Biological Data Framework rabbitmq: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers rabbitmq: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers rabbitmq: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers rabbitmq: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers rabbitmq: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers rabbitmq: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers rabbitmq: Simple 2 Publishers + 4 Consumers rabbitmq: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers dacapobench: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing dacapobench: H2O In-Memory Platform For Machine Learning a b c 99751 2531 9774 3463 5419 11649 2285 5369 6522 6878 747 1048 3033 573 2005 2982 2968 3404 4809 104644 98345 97651 103390 97739 97042 149390 97027 1496 3764 2528 9837 3510 5120 11195 2192 5365 6503 6848 729 1001 3078 803 2082 3018 2974 3149 4989 1534 3436 98748 2540 10829 3488 5600 12230 2518 5366 6449 6893 759 1053 2927 578 1906 3098 2888 3242 5012 104474 97498 104701 103115 100103 104319 155293 99610 1507 4083 OpenBenchmarking.org
RabbitMQ Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Receiving Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers a c 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 99751 98748
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Jython OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Jython b a c 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2528 2531 2540
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Eclipse OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Eclipse a b c 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 9774 9837 10829
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: GraphChi OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: GraphChi a c b 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3463 3488 3510
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradesoap OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradesoap b a c 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 5120 5419 5600
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradebeans OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradebeans b a c 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 11195 11649 12230
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Spring Boot OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Spring Boot b a c 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2192 2285 2518
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Kafka OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Kafka b c a 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 5365 5366 5369
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Tomcat OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Tomcat c b a 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 6449 6503 6522
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: jMonkeyEngine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: jMonkeyEngine b a c 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 6848 6878 6893
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT b a c 160 320 480 640 800 729 747 759
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit b a c 200 400 600 800 1000 1001 1048 1053
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: H2 Database Engine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2 Database Engine c a b 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 2927 3033 3078
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: FOP Print Formatter OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: FOP Print Formatter a c b 200 400 600 800 1000 573 578 803
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer c a b 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1906 2005 2082
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index a b c 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 2982 3018 3098
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine c a b 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 2888 2968 2974
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework b c a 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 3149 3242 3404
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework a b c 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 4809 4989 5012
RabbitMQ Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Receiving Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers a c 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 104644 104474
RabbitMQ Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Sending Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers a c 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 98345 97498
RabbitMQ Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Receiving Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers c a 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 104701 97651
RabbitMQ Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Sending Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers a c 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 103390 103115
RabbitMQ Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Receiving Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers c a 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 100103 97739
RabbitMQ Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Sending Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers c a 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 104319 97042
RabbitMQ Scenario: Simple 2 Publishers + 4 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Sending Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: Simple 2 Publishers + 4 Consumers c a 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K 155293 149390
RabbitMQ Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Sending Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.12.7 Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers c a 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 99610 97027
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing a c b 300 600 900 1200 1500 1496 1507 1534
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: H2O In-Memory Platform For Machine Learning OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2O In-Memory Platform For Machine Learning b a c 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 3436 3764 4083
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4