aug Intel Core i9-10980XE testing with a ASRock X299 Steel Legend (P1.30 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 4.80GHz (18 Cores / 36 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock X299 Steel Legend (P1.30 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Network: Intel I219-V + Intel I211 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-33-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 256 bits), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 b: Processor: Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 4.80GHz (18 Cores / 36 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock X299 Steel Legend (P1.30 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Network: Intel I219-V + Intel I211 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-33-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 256 bits), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 QuantLib 1.32 Configuration: Multi-Threaded MFLOPS > Higher Is Better a . 44641.0 |================================================================== b . 44888.6 |================================================================== QuantLib 1.32 Configuration: Single-Threaded MFLOPS > Higher Is Better a . 2682.0 |=================================================================== b . 2684.2 |=================================================================== CloverLeaf 1.3 Input: clover_bm Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 88.76 |==================================================================== b . 88.75 |==================================================================== CloverLeaf 1.3 Input: clover_bm64_short Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 212.72 |=================================================================== b . 211.67 |=================================================================== oneDNN 3.3 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 2.49348 |================================================================== b . 2.49628 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.3 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 5.38829 |================================================================== b . 5.25114 |================================================================ oneDNN 3.3 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.618773 |================================================================= b . 0.578244 |============================================================= oneDNN 3.3 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.20555 |================================================================ b . 1.24078 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.3 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 5.49542 |================================================================= b . 5.54192 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.3 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 2.91534 |================================================================== b . 2.85512 |================================================================= oneDNN 3.3 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 9.87746 |================================================================== b . 9.88829 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 6.90110 |================================================================== b . 6.86291 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 2.70456 |================================================================== b . 2.69575 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.3 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 9.03440 |================================================================== b . 9.05479 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.525652 |================================================================= b . 0.525029 |================================================================= oneDNN 3.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.633996 |================================================================ b . 0.643669 |================================================================= HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 16.32 |==================================================================== b . 15.81 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 1722.09 |================================================================== b . 1677.89 |================================================================ HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 20.95 |================================================================== b . 21.57 |==================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 8.82564 |================================================================= b . 8.93210 |================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 10.31 |==================================================================== b . 10.28 |==================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 35.70 |=================================================================== b . 36.11 |==================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 9.01432 |================================================================= b . 9.14240 |================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 55.07 |==================================================================== b . 54.92 |==================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 31.02 |=================================================================== b . 31.60 |==================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 16.73 |=================================================================== b . 16.86 |==================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 19.89 |=================================================================== b . 20.06 |==================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 26.27 |==================================================================== b . 25.64 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 941.96 |=================================================================== b . 898.31 |================================================================ HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.4 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 18.89 |==================================================================== b . 18.73 |=================================================================== oneDNN 3.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 1615.72 |================================================================== b . 1625.41 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.3 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 7.85872 |================================================================== b . 7.86557 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 11.06 |==================================================================== b . 11.02 |==================================================================== oneDNN 3.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 11.34 |==================================================================== b . 11.14 |=================================================================== oneDNN 3.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 906.09 |=================================================================== b . 908.25 |=================================================================== oneDNN 3.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 1650.24 |================================================================== b . 1632.03 |================================================================= oneDNN 3.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 897.02 |================================================================= b . 919.84 |=================================================================== easyWave r34 Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 1200 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 207.53 |=================================================================== b . 207.71 |=================================================================== easyWave r34 Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 240 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 8.422 |==================================================================== b . 8.418 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 6.77 |===================================================================== b . 6.74 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 1758.87 |================================================================== b . 1768.54 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 26.48 |==================================================================== b . 26.21 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 453.11 |================================================================== b . 457.70 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 26.51 |==================================================================== b . 26.25 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 452.46 |================================================================== b . 457.00 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 140.54 |================================================================== b . 142.30 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 85.30 |==================================================================== b . 84.25 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 26.96 |==================================================================== b . 26.97 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 444.06 |=================================================================== b . 444.29 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection Retail FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 759.10 |================================================================== b . 765.16 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection Retail FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 15.78 |==================================================================== b . 15.65 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 58.37 |==================================================================== b . 58.28 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 205.41 |=================================================================== b . 205.72 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 756.48 |=================================================================== b . 758.98 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 15.82 |==================================================================== b . 15.77 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 766.69 |=================================================================== b . 763.83 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 23.43 |==================================================================== b . 23.52 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 3190.1 |=================================================================== b . 3192.8 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 5.59 |===================================================================== b . 5.59 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 232.23 |=================================================================== b . 229.51 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 51.60 |=================================================================== b . 52.23 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 78.93 |==================================================================== b . 78.36 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 151.95 |=================================================================== b . 152.93 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 2725.10 |================================================================== b . 2734.29 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 6.58 |===================================================================== b . 6.57 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 322.01 |=================================================================== b . 322.81 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 37.23 |==================================================================== b . 37.14 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 171.99 |================================================================== b . 174.60 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 104.57 |=================================================================== b . 103.02 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 18225.98 |================================================================= b . 18196.60 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.97 |===================================================================== b . 0.97 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 208.24 |=================================================================== b . 150.46 |================================================ OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 86.37 |================================================ b . 119.54 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 35356.18 |================================================================= b . 35584.44 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.48 |===================================================================== b . 0.48 |===================================================================== QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: H4_ae Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 20.61 |==================================================================== b . 19.31 |================================================================ QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: Li2_STO_ae Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 219.65 |================================================================== b . 222.42 |=================================================================== QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: LiH_ae_MSD Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 106.57 |=================================================================== b . 106.32 |=================================================================== QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 42.51 |==================================================================== b . 42.48 |==================================================================== QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: O_ae_pyscf_UHF Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 238.00 |================================================================== b . 241.13 |=================================================================== QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: FeCO6_b3lyp_gms Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 183.42 |=================================================================== b . 183.17 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 422.16 |=================================================================== b . 422.06 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: scrypt kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 182.09 |=================================================================== b . 182.84 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 5431.94 |================================================================== b . 5428.44 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 2421.85 |================================================================== b . 2421.09 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 103360 |=================================================================== b . 103360 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 1603.79 |================================================================== b . 1596.74 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 23470 |==================================================================== b . 23190 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 7629.51 |================================================================== b . 7651.61 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 9720.14 |================================================================== b . 9722.17 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 37850 |==================================================================== b . 37850 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 23.5 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 53370 |==================================================================== b . 53490 |==================================================================== Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 20.27 |==================================================================== b . 20.16 |==================================================================== Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 17.72 |==================================================================== b . 17.65 |==================================================================== Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 23.00 |==================================================================== b . 23.14 |==================================================================== Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 20.72 |==================================================================== b . 20.69 |==================================================================== Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 22.85 |==================================================================== b . 22.84 |==================================================================== Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 19.61 |==================================================================== b . 19.63 |==================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.1 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 0.88 |===================================================================== b . 0.88 |===================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.1 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 0.88 |===================================================================== b . 0.88 |===================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.1 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 0.42 |===================================================================== b . 0.41 |=================================================================== OpenVKL 2.0.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkCPU ISPC Items / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 411 |====================================================================== b . 411 |====================================================================== OpenVKL 2.0.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkCPU Scalar Items / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 157 |====================================================================== b . 157 |====================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 6468 |===================================================================== b . 6463 |===================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 6625 |===================================================================== b . 6606 |===================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 7813 |===================================================================== b . 7854 |===================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 110942 |=================================================================== b . 110960 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 214480 |=================================================================== b . 214262 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 113740 |=================================================================== b . 114336 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 218906 |=================================================================== b . 218882 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 132846 |=================================================================== b . 132304 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 257612 |=================================================================== b . 257164 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 1636 |===================================================================== b . 1630 |===================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 1667 |===================================================================== b . 1667 |===================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 1968 |===================================================================== b . 1972 |===================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 33567 |==================================================================== b . 33453 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 59518 |==================================================================== b . 59525 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 34183 |==================================================================== b . 34063 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 60718 |==================================================================== b . 60600 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 38826 |==================================================================== b . 38857 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.13 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 70355 |==================================================================== b . 70459 |==================================================================== Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 413.86 |=================================================================== b . 413.59 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 7438.3 |=================================================================== b . 6824.9 |============================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 7457.4 |=================================================================== b . 7424.4 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 7361.7 |================================================================== b . 7424.0 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 6560.7 |=================================================================== b . 6563.5 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 10371.6 |================================================================== b . 10336.6 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 5468.8 |=================================================================== b . 5457.9 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 4399.7 |=================================================================== b . 4429.6 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 8267.5 |=================================================================== b . 8258.4 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 9855.4 |=================================================================== b . 9737.2 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 7828.9 |=================================================================== b . 7847.7 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 6761.1 |=================================================================== b . 6779.6 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 8107.4 |================================================================== b . 8211.3 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 7590.0 |================================================================== b . 7651.2 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 6752.2 |=================================================================== b . 6790.6 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 5467.9 |=================================================================== b . 5490.8 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 4239.4 |=================================================================== b . 4248.9 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 5578.8 |================================================================== b . 5636.2 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 4497.3 |=================================================================== b . 4516.0 |=================================================================== DuckDB 0.9.1 Benchmark: IMDB Seconds < Lower Is Better DuckDB 0.9.1 Benchmark: TPC-H Parquet Seconds < Lower Is Better