x3d smoke AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core testing with a ASRockRack B650D4U-2L2T/BCM (2.09 BIOS) and ASPEED 512MB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core @ 5.76GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack B650D4U-2L2T/BCM (2.09 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14d8, Memory: 2 x 32 GB DDR5-4800MT/s MTC20C2085S1EC48BA1, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS + 0GB Virtual HDisk0 + 0GB Virtual HDisk1 + 0GB Virtual HDisk2 + 0GB Virtual HDisk3, Graphics: ASPEED 512MB, Audio: AMD Device 1640, Monitor: VA2431, Network: 2 x Intel I210 + 2 x Broadcom BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.6.0-060600rc1daily20230913-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server, Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 239113 |=================================================================== BRL-CAD 7.36 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better a . 374910 |=================================================================== Laghos 3.1 Test: Triple Point Problem Major Kernels Total Rate > Higher Is Better a . 188.06 |=================================================================== Laghos 3.1 Test: Sedov Blast Wave, ube_922_hex.mesh Major Kernels Total Rate > Higher Is Better a . 208.34 |=================================================================== libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 76.22 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 38.83 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 6 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 3.581 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 6.208 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 10, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 4.009 |==================================================================== OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Bumper Beam Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 91.58 |==================================================================== OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Chrysler Neon 1M Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 802.83 |=================================================================== OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Cell Phone Drop Test Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 52.81 |==================================================================== OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Bird Strike on Windshield Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 150.44 |=================================================================== OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Rubber O-Ring Seal Installation Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 68.07 |==================================================================== OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 269.84 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 13.3 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 601.19 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 94.52 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 84.58 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 93.97 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 85.07 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 1029.58 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 7.75 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 25.4 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 314.54 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Face Detection Retail FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 3020.18 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Face Detection Retail FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 2.53 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 437.84 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 18.24 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 1603.48 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 4.95 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 1337.87 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 11.93 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 4439.79 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 3.49 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 522.97 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 15.27 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 129.21 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 61.81 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 2577.84 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 6.15 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 1592.06 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 5 |======================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 738.71 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 21.63 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 33616.1 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.43 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 587.96 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 27.17 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 48018.6 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.29 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1291828 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.619 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1295388 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.772 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1245 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 642.58 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1141 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 876.57 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1176111 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.68 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1123031 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.89 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 46961 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 17.04 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 41424 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 24.14 |==================================================================== Remhos 1.0 Test: Sample Remap Example Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 24.80 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 7.348 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 14.51 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 21.66 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 41.04 |====================================================================