Xeon Max Linux Kernels 2 x Intel Xeon Max 9480 testing with a Supermicro X13DEM v1.10 (1.3 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. v6.4: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Max 9480 @ 3.50GHz (112 Cores / 224 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X13DEM v1.10 (1.3 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 1bce, Memory: 512GB, Disk: 2 x 7682GB INTEL SSDPF2KX076TZ, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Broadcom BCM57508 NetXtreme-E 10Gb/25Gb/40Gb/50Gb/100Gb/200Gb OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.4.0-060400-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Crypto++ 8.8 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 604.54 |================================================================ Crypto++ 8.8 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 441.20 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Hash Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 17389901.32 |=========================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 7996.78 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 514.09 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Pipe Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 31203885.98 |=========================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Poll Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 5307662.30 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Zlib Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 8220.83 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Futex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 72753.47 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 1055.35 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Mutex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 23140484.14 |=========================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 17.75 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 152827.15 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 217211109.03 |========================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Cloning Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 6428.75 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 28486.68 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Pthread Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 36288.24 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: AVL Tree Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 790.23 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: IO_uring Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 2619140.96 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 1084831.27 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 938764.06 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 200494.80 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 177471711.51 |========================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 396715.18 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 381412.82 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: AVX-512 VNNI Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 11752668.18 |=========================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Function Call Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 63249.99 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: x86_64 RdRand Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 637179.52 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 31253.93 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Matrix 3D Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 28901.02 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 25816.50 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Shuffle Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 551599.32 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Mixed Scheduler Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 74205.17 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 3083.04 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Wide Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 5961543.12 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 13968013.67 |=========================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Fused Multiply-Add Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 253366692.27 |========================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 244931.41 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 81547074.59 |=========================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 1875.83 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 18811154.40 |=========================================================== nekRS 23.0 Input: Kershaw flops/rank > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 5865983333 |============================================================ nekRS 23.0 Input: TurboPipe Periodic flops/rank > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 4098953333 |============================================================ OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Bumper Beam Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 95.17 |================================================================= OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Chrysler Neon 1M Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 128.50 |================================================================ OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Cell Phone Drop Test Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 32.37 |================================================================= OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Bird Strike on Windshield Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 159.21 |================================================================ OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Rubber O-Ring Seal Installation Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 116.35 |================================================================ OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 138.97 |================================================================ TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 36.85 |================================================================= TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 45.20 |================================================================= TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 53.04 |================================================================= TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 65.22 |================================================================= NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 37.13 |================================================================= NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 13.47 |================================================================= NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 16.26 |================================================================= NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 27.45 |================================================================= NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 13.54 |================================================================= NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 21.53 |================================================================= NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 9.39 |================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 34.58 |================================================================= NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 63.23 |================================================================= NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 15.69 |================================================================= NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 22.78 |================================================================= NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 45.37 |================================================================= NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 44.93 |================================================================= NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 26.70 |================================================================= NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 151.43 |================================================================ NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: vision_transformer ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 125.89 |================================================================ NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: FastestDet ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 18.43 |================================================================= High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 104 104 104 - RT: 60 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 104.68 |================================================================ High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 144 144 144 - RT: 60 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 76.58 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 322119.99 |============================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 51894.85 |============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 10844.90 |============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 10703.40 |============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 103248.13 |============================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 3073.61 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 269542.21 |============================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 239408.11 |============================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 176009.15 |============================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 193221.95 |============================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 35.24 |================================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 80.64 |================================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 34.17 |================================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 8.713 |================================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 42.61 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 125.69 |================================================================ OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 293.6 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 474.05 |================================================================ OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 77.97 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 475.66 |================================================================ OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 77.70 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 2572.63 |=============================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 14.35 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 331.20 |================================================================ OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 337.22 |================================================================ OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Face Detection Retail FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 11342.54 |============================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Face Detection Retail FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 9.85 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 1112.46 |=============================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 33.21 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 5018.03 |=============================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 22.28 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 16690.36 |============================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 6.60 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 16182.55 |============================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 6.89 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 1503.54 |=============================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 74.40 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 667.64 |================================================================ OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 55.31 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 25464.62 |============================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 4.23 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 6316.44 |=============================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 17.70 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 3597.65 |=============================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 31.10 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 74954.03 |============================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 0.57 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 2452.14 |=============================================================== OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 45.63 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 112475.34 |============================================================= OpenVINO 2023.1 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 0.34 |================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size - Mesh Time Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 39.36 |================================================================= OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size - Execution Time Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 37.84 |================================================================= OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Mesh Time Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 175.93 |================================================================ OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Execution Time Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 195.89 |================================================================ 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 283556 |================================================================ 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 400370 |================================================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 187.32 |================================================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 275.09 |================================================================ Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 37.32 |================================================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 288.41 |================================================================ AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 0.39 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 7.07 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 41.51 |================================================================= AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 14.30 |================================================================= AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 41.67 |================================================================= AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 47.54 |================================================================= AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 44.23 |================================================================= AOM AV1 3.7 Encoder Mode: Speed 11 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 49.09 |================================================================= SVT-AV1 1.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 4.132 |================================================================= SVT-AV1 1.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 55.03 |================================================================= SVT-AV1 1.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 133.93 |================================================================ SVT-AV1 1.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 145.92 |================================================================ SVT-AV1 1.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 11.59 |================================================================= SVT-AV1 1.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 110.86 |================================================================ SVT-AV1 1.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 426.84 |================================================================ SVT-AV1 1.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 518.77 |================================================================ Blender 3.6 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 21.48 |================================================================= Blender 3.6 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 53.14 |================================================================= Blender 3.6 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 40.12 |================================================================= Blender 3.6 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 315.02 |================================================================ Blender 3.6 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 74.88 |================================================================= VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 5.075 |================================================================= VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 8.450 |================================================================= VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 16.34 |================================================================= VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 28.27 |================================================================= libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 70.74 |================================================================= libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 39.37 |================================================================= libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 6 Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 3.728 |================================================================= libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 6.892 |================================================================= libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 10, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 5.075 |================================================================= Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 294150 |================================================================ Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 269034 |================================================================ Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 315528 |================================================================ Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 265652 |================================================================ Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 26557 |================================================================= Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 60316 |================================================================= Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 239582 |================================================================ Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 1000 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 274610 |================================================================ Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 500 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 226282 |================================================================ Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 47745 |================================================================= Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 20233 |================================================================= Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 37254 |================================================================= Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 500 - Files: 100000 Ops per sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 7703 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 12977461 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 126.00 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 30189985 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 130.81 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 39122053 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 155.22 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 24582941 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 70.77 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 43036898 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 97.16 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 52514008 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 125.95 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 41675265 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 42.68 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 40520901 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 163.36 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 59376956 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 77.00 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 58096600 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 265.99 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 67045377 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 111.75 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 66098942 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 370.82 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 51248299 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 35.31 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 50423542 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 140.40 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 66287906 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 69.88 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 65784478 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 277.40 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 72605513 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 104.93 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 point/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 73678024 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 Average Latency < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 399.86 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 2331936.55 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 2189050.67 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 2249364.77 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 2262895.86 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 650214 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 1.237 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 640235 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 1.570 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 45581 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 17.56 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 701213 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 1.141 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 42947 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 23.30 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 710079 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 1.411 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 20416 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 39.25 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better v6.4 . 19884 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better v6.4 . 50.36 |=================================================================