python1-result Ubuntu 22.04 with Sunlight Realtime Linux Kernel Intel Core i7-1260P: Processor: Intel Core i7-1260P @ 4.70GHz (12 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Intel NUC12WSBi7 (WSADL357.0088.2023.0505.1623 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Alder Lake PCH, Memory: 2 x 8 GB DDR4-3200MT/s NT8GA64D88CX3S-JR, Disk: 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00A00, Graphics: Intel Alder Lake-P IGP (1400MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC269VB, Monitor: HP E27d G4, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Alder Lake-P PCH CNVi WiFi OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.5-pve-v4-realtime-rt8 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server, Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1440 Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 520.02 |================================================= Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 15.94 |================================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 566 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: KNN CAD Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 245.03 |================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Relative Entropy Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 20.70 |================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Windowed Gaussian Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 12.28 |================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Earthgecko Skyline Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 140.16 |================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Bayesian Changepoint Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 33.28 |================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Contextual Anomaly Detector OSE Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 45.83 |================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_ica Seconds < Lower Is Better Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_qda Seconds < Lower Is Better Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 13.79 |================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 135.25 |================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 0.002 |================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 0.006 |================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 0.015 |================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 0.028 |================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 0.066 |================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 0.117 |================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 0.302 |================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 0.562 |================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 2.183 |================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 2.576 |================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: GLM Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: SAGA Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Tree Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Lasso Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Glmnet Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Sparsify Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 69.61 |================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Ward Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: MNIST Dataset Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 56.19 |================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Neighbors Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: SGD Regression Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: SGDOneClassSVM Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Lasso Path Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Isolation Forest Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Fast KMeans Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Text Vectorizers Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 45.60 |================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Hierarchical Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot OMP vs. LARS Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Feature Expansions Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: LocalOutlierFactor Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: TSNE MNIST Dataset Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 451.73 |================================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Isotonic / Logistic Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Incremental PCA Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Parallel Pairwise Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Isotonic / Pathological Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: RCV1 Logreg Convergencet Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Sample Without Replacement Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Covertype Dataset Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 368.00 |================================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Adult Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 140.64 |================================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Isotonic / Perturbed Logarithm Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Threading Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 174.06 |================================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Singular Value Decomposition Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Higgs Boson Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: 20 Newsgroups / Logistic Regression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 34.30 |================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Polynomial Kernel Approximation Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Non-Negative Matrix Factorization Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Categorical Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 27.61 |================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Kernel PCA Solvers / Time vs. N Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Kernel PCA Solvers / Time vs. N Components Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Sparse Random Projections / 100 Iterations Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7-1260P . 21912.98 |===============================================