scma
scm2


scma2: 

	Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 @ 3.50GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0C4Y3R (2.9.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v2/Xeon, Memory: 144GB, Disk: 1024GB JAJM600M1TB + 2 x 4000GB PERC H710P + 12001GB PERC H710P + 1000GB PERC H710P + 2000GB + 62GB Ultra + 4001GB Expansion Desk + 16GB SanDisk 3.2Gen1, Graphics: llvmpipe (324/405MHz), Audio: C-Media CMI8738/CMI8768, Monitor: C27F390, Network: 4 x Intel I350 + Mellanox MT27500

	OS: openSUSE 20230915, Kernel: 6.6.0-rc2-1.g8a1f7fd-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.27.8, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.8, Display Driver: NVIDIA 535.104.05, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 23.1.7 (LLVM 16.0.6 256 bits), OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 LINUX + OpenCL 1.2 Intel FPGA SDK for OpenCL 20.3 + OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.2.138, Compiler: PGI Compiler + Clang 16.0.3 + ICC 2021.10.0 20230609 + CUDA 12.2, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
scma2 . 1005.08 |==============================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
scma2 . 742.25 |===============================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
scma2 . 548.79 |===============================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
scma2 . 264.87 |===============================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
scma2 . 113.42 |===============================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
scma2 . 534.88 |===============================================================