AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U testing with a LENOVO 21K5001JUS (R2FET31W 1.11 BIOS) and AMD Phoenix1 4GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2309163-NE-PGBENCHPR45
pgbench pro
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U testing with a LENOVO 21K5001JUS (R2FET31W 1.11 BIOS) and AMD Phoenix1 4GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
a:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U @ 5.13GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO 21K5001JUS (R2FET31W 1.11 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14e8, Memory: 60GB, Disk: 1024GB Kioxia KXG8AZNV1T02 LA, Graphics: AMD Phoenix1 4GB (2700/800MHz), Audio: AMD Rembrandt Radeon HD Audio, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Qualcomm QCNFA765
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.1-060501-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.1.7-1ubuntu1 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.54), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2880x1800
b:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U @ 5.13GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO 21K5001JUS (R2FET31W 1.11 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14e8, Memory: 60GB, Disk: 1024GB Kioxia KXG8AZNV1T02 LA, Graphics: AMD Phoenix1 4GB (2700/800MHz), Audio: AMD Rembrandt Radeon HD Audio, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Qualcomm QCNFA765
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.1-060501-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.1.7-1ubuntu1 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.54), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2880x1800
c:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U @ 5.13GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO 21K5001JUS (R2FET31W 1.11 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14e8, Memory: 60GB, Disk: 1024GB Kioxia KXG8AZNV1T02 LA, Graphics: AMD Phoenix1 4GB (2700/800MHz), Audio: AMD Rembrandt Radeon HD Audio, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Qualcomm QCNFA765
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.5.1-060501-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.1.7-1ubuntu1 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.54), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2880x1800
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 552132 |===================================================================
b . 554420 |===================================================================
c . 550160 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 0.091 |====================================================================
b . 0.090 |===================================================================
c . 0.091 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 547988 |===================================================================
b . 541908 |==================================================================
c . 542426 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 0.182 |===================================================================
b . 0.185 |====================================================================
c . 0.184 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 527816 |===================================================================
b . 530453 |===================================================================
c . 518321 |=================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 0.474 |===================================================================
b . 0.471 |==================================================================
c . 0.482 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 2659 |=====================================================================
b . 2643 |=====================================================================
c . 2659 |=====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 18.81 |====================================================================
b . 18.92 |====================================================================
c . 18.81 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 495625 |=================================================================
b . 509979 |===================================================================
c . 511103 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 1.009 |====================================================================
b . 0.980 |==================================================================
c . 0.978 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 463149 |===================================================================
b . 446851 |=================================================================
c . 455374 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 1.727 |==================================================================
b . 1.790 |====================================================================
c . 1.757 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 2526 |=====================================================================
b . 2524 |=====================================================================
c . 2500 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 39.59 |===================================================================
b . 39.62 |===================================================================
c . 40.01 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 449418 |===================================================================
b . 438732 |=================================================================
c . 433240 |=================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 2.225 |==================================================================
b . 2.279 |===================================================================
c . 2.308 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 2164 |=====================================================================
b . 2121 |====================================================================
c . 2134 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 115.55 |==================================================================
b . 117.88 |===================================================================
c . 117.13 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 1527 |===================================================================
b . 1559 |=====================================================================
c . 1561 |=====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 327.46 |===================================================================
b . 320.65 |==================================================================
c . 320.35 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 1042 |=====================================================================
b . 915 |=============================================================
c . 904 |============================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 767.82 |==========================================================
b . 874.15 |==================================================================
c . 885.31 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 495575 |==================================================================
b . 501275 |===================================================================
c . 498274 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 0.101 |====================================================================
b . 0.100 |===================================================================
c . 0.100 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 835 |======================================================================
b . 788 |==================================================================
c . 764 |================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 1198.17 |============================================================
b . 1268.51 |================================================================
c . 1309.48 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 505281 |===================================================================
b . 502379 |===================================================================
c . 505621 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 0.198 |====================================================================
b . 0.199 |====================================================================
c . 0.198 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 489281 |===================================================================
b . 479888 |==================================================================
c . 482237 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 0.511 |===================================================================
b . 0.521 |====================================================================
c . 0.518 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 31791 |====================================================================
b . 31986 |====================================================================
c . 31701 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 1.573 |====================================================================
b . 1.563 |===================================================================
c . 1.577 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 426381 |==================================================================
b . 430644 |===================================================================
c . 428224 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 1.173 |====================================================================
b . 1.161 |===================================================================
c . 1.168 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 370955 |=========================================================
b . 390054 |============================================================
c . 434836 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 2.157 |====================================================================
b . 2.051 |=================================================================
c . 1.840 |==========================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 39277 |====================================================================
b . 39225 |====================================================================
c . 38965 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 2.546 |===================================================================
b . 2.549 |====================================================================
c . 2.566 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 348036 |===================================================================
b . 344834 |==================================================================
c . 203191 |=======================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 2.873 |========================================
b . 2.900 |========================================
c . 4.921 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 32150 |===================================================================
b . 32337 |===================================================================
c . 32722 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 7.776 |====================================================================
b . 7.731 |====================================================================
c . 7.640 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 24499 |====================================================================
b . 24562 |====================================================================
c . 24465 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 20.41 |====================================================================
b . 20.36 |====================================================================
c . 20.44 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 19593 |==================================================================
b . 19738 |===================================================================
c . 20176 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 40.83 |====================================================================
b . 40.53 |====================================================================
c . 39.65 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 17497 |==================================================================
b . 17432 |==================================================================
c . 18090 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL 16
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 57.15 |====================================================================
b . 57.37 |====================================================================
c . 55.28 |==================================================================