r7iz.4xlarge amazon testing on Amazon Linux 2 via the Phoronix Test Suite. r7iz.4xlarge: Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 6455B (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Amazon EC2 r7iz.4xlarge (1.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 1 x 128 GB 4800MT/s, Disk: 86GB Amazon Elastic Block Store, Network: Amazon Elastic OS: Amazon Linux 2, Kernel: 5.10.186-179.751.amzn2.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 10.4.1 20221124, File-System: xfs, System Layer: amazon BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 1436870 |======================================================= BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 7333 |========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 92.75 |========================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 91.06 |========================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 5529.15 |======================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 5505.44 |======================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 387.26 |======================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 387.68 |======================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 478.71 |======================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 477.76 |======================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 139.27 |======================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 139.37 |======================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 MiB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 845.75 |======================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 846.95 |======================================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 57.34 |========================================================= CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 4246.07 |======================================================= CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 28547.30 |====================================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 56544.65 |====================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Atol Seconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 39.09 |========================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Ctype Seconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 28.69 |========================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Math Library Seconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 249.80 |======================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Random Numbers Seconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 936.70 |======================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Vector Seconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 59.03 |========================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Function Objects Seconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 13.72 |========================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Abstraction Seconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 21.73 |========================================================= DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 msec < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 3255 |========================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2377 |========================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Eclipse msec < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 13630 |========================================================= DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 3280 |========================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 3121 |========================================================== GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 6370.7 |======================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 507 |=========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 981 |=========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 142 |=========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 237 |=========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 1125 |========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 222 |=========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 1072 |========================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Idle Latency ns < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 113.9 |========================================================= Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 149243.59 |===================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 170862.56 |===================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 176424.12 |===================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 176001.88 |===================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 167806.81 |===================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 147899.5 |====================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 169108.2 |====================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 174952.4 |====================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 173449.5 |====================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 167090.0 |====================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 8081.75 |======================================================= LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 8859.6 |======================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 58.45 |========================================================= LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 8559.1 |======================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 57.13 |========================================================= LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 8565.7 |======================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 82948.76 |====================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 110330.35 |===================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 110863.46 |===================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 106642.12 |===================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 100508.87 |===================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 4000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 85555.51 |====================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 11677925467 |=================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 4137982973 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 5961.4 |======================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 175992.6 |====================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 57849221030 |=================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 166322623283 |================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 127506231203 |================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 41591039407 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 208 |=========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 265 |=========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 91.5 |========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 87.5 |========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 96.2 |========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 14.5 |========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 412 |=========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 18.9 |========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 93.2 |========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 152 |=========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 7.39 |========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 47.4 |========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 381 |=========================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2744345.87 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2845380.04 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2515318.79 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2598372.87 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2736936.78 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2479007.66 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2445180.56 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2805926.48 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2479211.72 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2601293.82 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2301196.12 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2397346.06 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2769214.42 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2377904.81 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2665199.25 |==================================================== Renaissance 0.14 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 621.2 |========================================================= Renaissance 0.14 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 567.8 |========================================================= Renaissance 0.14 Test: ALS Movie Lens ms < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 6272.6 |======================================================== Renaissance 0.14 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2531.3 |======================================================== Renaissance 0.14 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 908.8 |========================================================= Renaissance 0.14 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 7237.0 |======================================================== Renaissance 0.14 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2443.9 |======================================================== Renaissance 0.14 Test: Finagle HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2363.3 |======================================================== Renaissance 0.14 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 3442.0 |======================================================== Renaissance 0.14 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 12120.2 |======================================================= Renaissance 0.14 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 1732.9 |======================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 1001.90 |======================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 190.62 |======================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 539.64 |======================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 1190.51 |======================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 1709.25 |======================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 1379.51 |======================================================= Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 9.182 |========================================================= Stockfish 15 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 27498419 |====================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 171559.6 |====================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 118927.7 |====================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 128231.5 |====================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 128078.9 |====================================================== x264 2022-02-22 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 30.23 |========================================================= x264 2022-02-22 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 127.15 |======================================================== x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 15.27 |========================================================= x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 68.09 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 2305.8 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 1538.8 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 552.0 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 1637.5 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 219.1 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 1569.0 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 14.4 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 1357.5 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 903.2 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 1577.6 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 581.2 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 1619.5 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 7.78 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better r7iz.4xlarge . 1306.2 |========================================================