smoke test xeon e23 Tests for a future article. Intel Xeon E-2336 testing with a ASRockRack E3C252D4U (1.22 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: Intel Xeon E-2388G @ 3.20GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack E3C252D4U (1.22 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-H, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS, Graphics: Intel RocketLake-S [UHD ], Monitor: VA2431, Network: 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-26-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 b: Processor: Intel Xeon E-2388G @ 3.20GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack E3C252D4U (1.22 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-H, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS, Graphics: Intel RocketLake-S [UHD ], Monitor: VA2431, Network: 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-26-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 c: Processor: Intel Xeon E-2388G @ 3.20GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack E3C252D4U (1.22 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-H, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS, Graphics: Intel RocketLake-S [UHD ], Monitor: VA2431, Network: 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-26-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 d: Processor: Intel Xeon E-2336 @ 2.90GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack E3C252D4U (1.22 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-H, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-26-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 e: Processor: Intel Xeon E-2336 @ 2.90GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack E3C252D4U (1.22 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-H, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-26-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better a . 60277 |==================================================================== b . 60011 |=================================================================== c . 60515 |==================================================================== d . 45744 |=================================================== e . 46210 |==================================================== 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better a . 53435 |==================================================================== b . 53604 |==================================================================== c . 53558 |==================================================================== d . 37356 |=============================================== e . 37236 |=============================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better a . 192619900 |================================================================ b . 190611300 |=============================================================== c . 190589800 |=============================================================== d . 192808700 |================================================================ e . 192950100 |================================================================ Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 94988 |==================================================================== b . 95080 |==================================================================== d . 67038 |================================================ e . 68189 |================================================= Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 88.63 |====================================================== b . 84.22 |=================================================== d . 109.97 |=================================================================== e . 109.87 |=================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 148.00 |====================================================== b . 149.70 |====================================================== d . 183.66 |=================================================================== e . 184.80 |=================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 208.65 |==================================================== b . 212.42 |===================================================== d . 267.83 |=================================================================== e . 262.24 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 780967.47 |================================================================ b . 783425.31 |================================================================ d . 693352.96 |========================================================= e . 671390.07 |======================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 11.83 |==================================================== b . 11.82 |==================================================== d . 14.42 |=============================================================== e . 15.45 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1447958.54 |=============================================================== b . 1446859.96 |=============================================================== d . 1342250.61 |========================================================== e . 1349022.28 |=========================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 20.68 |============================================================ b . 20.85 |============================================================= d . 23.25 |==================================================================== e . 22.80 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1175572.13 |============================================================== b . 1187104.23 |=============================================================== d . 1082993.14 |========================================================= e . 1080456.40 |========================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 10.09 |============================================================ b . 9.97 |=========================================================== d . 11.48 |==================================================================== e . 11.39 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1869315.57 |=============================================================== b . 1868505.59 |=============================================================== d . 1768171.84 |============================================================ e . 1779490.51 |============================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 19.82 |================================================================ b . 19.80 |================================================================ d . 21.11 |==================================================================== e . 21.05 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1810868.13 |=============================================================== b . 1767214.52 |============================================================= d . 1609911.22 |======================================================== e . 1699283.73 |=========================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 8.08 |=========================================================== b . 8.39 |============================================================= d . 9.44 |===================================================================== e . 8.86 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2558694.08 |=============================================================== b . 2554316.08 |=============================================================== d . 2139318.30 |===================================================== e . 2166865.16 |===================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 16.36 |======================================================= b . 16.29 |====================================================== d . 20.38 |==================================================================== e . 19.55 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 31169657.42 |============================================================= b . 31446324.62 |============================================================== d . 27658814.36 |======================================================= e . 27941009.12 |======================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 49.28 |=========================================================== b . 48.76 |=========================================================== d . 56.44 |==================================================================== e . 55.42 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 35731058.31 |============================================================== b . 35881779.03 |============================================================== d . 31204403.42 |====================================================== e . 30519342.37 |===================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 122.86 |========================================================= b . 122.59 |========================================================= d . 139.93 |================================================================= e . 144.80 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 33440678.10 |============================================================= b . 33835269.57 |============================================================== d . 29837035.03 |======================================================= e . 29645835.71 |====================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 51.82 |============================================================ b . 51.04 |=========================================================== d . 58.92 |==================================================================== e . 58.71 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 36535518.62 |============================================================== b . 36624182.35 |============================================================== d . 30570884.25 |==================================================== e . 30665605.41 |==================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 128.26 |======================================================== b . 127.24 |======================================================== d . 152.42 |=================================================================== e . 152.54 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 37703435.51 |============================================================= b . 38375799.87 |============================================================== d . 30418152.44 |================================================= e . 30686841.47 |================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 48.28 |====================================================== b . 48.04 |====================================================== d . 60.56 |==================================================================== e . 60.80 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 32700015.96 |============================================================== b . 32929010.53 |============================================================== d . 26725280.14 |================================================== e . 26463397.35 |================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 145.58 |====================================================== b . 144.40 |===================================================== d . 179.03 |================================================================== e . 181.42 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 3.40 |==================================================== b . 3.41 |===================================================== d . 4.47 |===================================================================== e . 4.36 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 228.74 |============================================== b . 229.11 |============================================== d . 334.46 |=================================================================== e . 332.65 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 11.97 |================================================ b . 12.08 |================================================ d . 16.96 |==================================================================== e . 16.90 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 3.41 |=========================================================== b . 3.52 |============================================================= d . 3.94 |===================================================================== e . 3.96 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 2.83 |==================================================== b . 2.49 |============================================== d . 3.77 |===================================================================== e . 3.65 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 2.07 |===================================================== b . 2.14 |======================================================= d . 2.54 |================================================================== e . 2.67 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1.76 |===================================================== b . 1.66 |================================================== d . 2.14 |================================================================= e . 2.28 |===================================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 219.97 |============================================== b . 219.76 |============================================== d . 320.16 |=================================================================== e . 320.30 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 165.02 |=================================================================== b . 164.75 |=================================================================== d . 159.49 |================================================================= e . 160.26 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 965.57 |================================================================== b . 964.26 |================================================================== d . 978.58 |=================================================================== e . 976.79 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1353.70 |================================================================== b . 1353.70 |================================================================== d . 1340.21 |================================================================= e . 1338.53 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1482.46 |================================================================== b . 1474.13 |================================================================== d . 1178.42 |==================================================== e . 1192.71 |===================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1441.73 |================================================================== a . 1433.86 |================================================================== b . 1433.86 |================================================================== d . 1222.34 |======================================================== e . 1229.98 |======================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1044.14 |================================================================= b . 1052.40 |================================================================== d . 971.74 |============================================================= e . 975.30 |============================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1763.28 |================================================================= b . 1799.03 |================================================================== d . 1613.67 |=========================================================== e . 1643.56 |============================================================ ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Fast MT/s > Higher Is Better a . 154.04 |=================================================================== b . 154.35 |=================================================================== d . 115.97 |================================================== e . 116.02 |================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Medium MT/s > Higher Is Better a . 58.99 |==================================================================== b . 58.97 |==================================================================== d . 44.27 |=================================================== e . 44.28 |=================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Thorough MT/s > Higher Is Better a . 7.7426 |=================================================================== b . 7.7458 |=================================================================== d . 5.6478 |================================================= e . 5.6502 |================================================= ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Exhaustive MT/s > Higher Is Better a . 0.6255 |================================================================== b . 0.6319 |=================================================================== d . 0.4331 |============================================== e . 0.4341 |============================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 169.12 |============================================== b . 170.03 |============================================== d . 247.35 |=================================================================== e . 247.56 |=================================================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 457.07 |============================================== b . 455.44 |============================================== d . 665.87 |=================================================================== e . 666.90 |=================================================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1748.10 |============================================= b . 1774.34 |============================================== d . 2553.87 |================================================================== e . 2552.64 |================================================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 565.27 |============================================== b . 556.90 |============================================= d . 820.58 |=================================================================== e . 820.23 |=================================================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 215.45 |============================================== b . 215.41 |============================================== d . 312.67 |=================================================================== e . 312.98 |=================================================================== BRL-CAD 7.36 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better a . 130412 |=================================================================== b . 129573 |=================================================================== d . 89349 |============================================== e . 88988 |============================================== Build2 0.15 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 189.45 |=============================================== b . 195.72 |================================================= c . 188.23 |=============================================== d . 267.08 |=================================================================== e . 268.23 |=================================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better a . 108.20 |=================================================================== b . 108.92 |=================================================================== d . 95.87 |=========================================================== e . 99.39 |============================================================= ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better a . 113.63 |=================================================================== b . 112.91 |=================================================================== d . 103.13 |============================================================= e . 102.31 |============================================================ ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better a . 113.53 |=================================================================== b . 111.97 |================================================================== d . 103.15 |============================================================= e . 103.64 |============================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 1585.2 |=================================================================== b . 1593.2 |=================================================================== d . 1516.5 |================================================================ e . 1526.1 |================================================================ CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 35453.4 |================================================================== b . 35385.6 |================================================================== d . 25426.6 |=============================================== e . 25553.4 |================================================ CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 41502.1 |================================================================== b . 41631.8 |================================================================== d . 29116.8 |============================================== e . 29169.3 |============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 43217.0 |================================================================== b . 43502.4 |================================================================== d . 30118.1 |============================================== e . 30193.8 |============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 51806.0 |================================================================== b . 51957.3 |================================================================== d . 35989.6 |============================================== e . 35997.7 |============================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 334.52 |=================================================================== b . 334.68 |=================================================================== c . 334.68 |=================================================================== d . 237.94 |================================================ e . 233.12 |=============================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 343.64 |================================================================== b . 342.56 |================================================================== c . 347.04 |=================================================================== d . 247.16 |================================================ e . 250.81 |================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: scrypt kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 242.47 |=================================================================== b . 242.77 |=================================================================== c . 244.07 |=================================================================== d . 180.71 |================================================== e . 180.81 |================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 8128.92 |================================================================= b . 8215.17 |================================================================== c . 8152.24 |================================================================= d . 5748.68 |============================================== e . 5850.18 |=============================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 1685.16 |================================================================== b . 1686.70 |================================================================== c . 1683.88 |================================================================== d . 1203.63 |=============================================== e . 1190.30 |=============================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 592320 |=================================================================== b . 593650 |=================================================================== c . 594430 |=================================================================== d . 417080 |=============================================== e . 417510 |=============================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 3305.88 |============================================================== b . 3273.74 |============================================================= c . 3516.83 |================================================================== d . 2610.22 |================================================= e . 2493.12 |=============================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 75840 |==================================================================== b . 75200 |=================================================================== c . 75270 |=================================================================== d . 52830 |=============================================== e . 53050 |================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 27670 |==================================================================== b . 27390 |=================================================================== c . 27240 |=================================================================== d . 19530 |================================================ e . 19560 |================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 54340 |==================================================================== b . 54340 |==================================================================== c . 54450 |==================================================================== d . 39570 |================================================= e . 38470 |================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 127140 |=================================================================== b . 123930 |================================================================= c . 124050 |================================================================= d . 87680 |============================================== e . 88000 |============================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 177750 |================================================================== b . 181190 |=================================================================== c . 180730 |=================================================================== d . 127480 |=============================================== e . 127470 |=============================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3442545.53 |=============================================================== b . 3386413.69 |============================================================== d . 2416447.01 |============================================ e . 2436674.73 |============================================= Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3390692.31 |=============================================================== b . 3407584.22 |=============================================================== d . 2447513.39 |============================================= e . 2452945.72 |============================================= Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3509365.98 |============================================================== b . 3551639.05 |=============================================================== d . 2500811.71 |============================================ e . 2513794.98 |============================================= Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3000846.79 |=============================================================== b . 3012041.19 |=============================================================== d . 2037833.52 |=========================================== e . 2031408.76 |========================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3569222.70 |=============================================================== b . 3580150.29 |=============================================================== d . 2548641.80 |============================================= e . 2419203.43 |=========================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3406857.67 |=============================================================== b . 3403187.91 |=============================================================== d . 2455266.37 |============================================= e . 2449997.94 |============================================= Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3339072.06 |=============================================================== b . 3331423.51 |=============================================================== d . 2412723.51 |============================================== e . 2411587.54 |============================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2955396.42 |============================================================== b . 3009409.13 |=============================================================== d . 2109010.30 |============================================ e . 2055869.52 |=========================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3296080.94 |========================================================== b . 3582493.35 |=============================================================== d . 2565892.85 |============================================= e . 2544125.94 |============================================= Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3310390.02 |============================================================= b . 3418062.57 |=============================================================== d . 2468187.63 |============================================= e . 2466340.57 |============================================= Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3331550.72 |=============================================================== b . 3335026.97 |=============================================================== d . 2424431.95 |============================================== e . 2423927.40 |============================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3004715.33 |=============================================================== b . 3004192.87 |=============================================================== d . 2084872.04 |============================================ e . 2117511.76 |============================================ Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3654927.90 |=============================================================== b . 3457130.11 |============================================================ d . 2571654.79 |============================================ e . 2595364.56 |============================================= Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3453155.48 |=============================================================== b . 3454075.39 |=============================================================== d . 2503115.23 |============================================== e . 2500272.78 |============================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3382163.21 |=============================================================== b . 3389154.48 |=============================================================== d . 2458737.20 |============================================== e . 2462268.97 |============================================== EnCodec 0.1.1 Target Bandwidth: 3 kbps Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 25.89 |=========================================================== b . 25.89 |=========================================================== d . 29.29 |=================================================================== e . 29.85 |==================================================================== EnCodec 0.1.1 Target Bandwidth: 6 kbps Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 26.60 |============================================================ b . 26.67 |============================================================ d . 29.81 |=================================================================== e . 30.37 |==================================================================== EnCodec 0.1.1 Target Bandwidth: 24 kbps Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 31.71 |============================================================ b . 31.85 |============================================================ d . 35.68 |=================================================================== e . 36.02 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 38.05 |======================================================== b . 38.17 |========================================================= c . 38.25 |========================================================= d . 45.84 |==================================================================== e . 45.61 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better a . 132.73 |=================================================================== b . 132.30 |=================================================================== c . 132.03 |=================================================================== d . 110.17 |======================================================== e . 110.72 |======================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 113.49 |======================================================= b . 113.53 |======================================================= c . 113.77 |======================================================= d . 138.66 |=================================================================== e . 138.67 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better a . 22.25 |==================================================================== b . 22.24 |==================================================================== c . 22.19 |==================================================================== d . 18.21 |======================================================== e . 18.21 |======================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 170.20 |======================================================== b . 170.46 |======================================================== c . 169.84 |======================================================== d . 204.50 |=================================================================== e . 204.47 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better a . 44.51 |==================================================================== b . 44.44 |==================================================================== c . 44.60 |==================================================================== d . 37.04 |======================================================== e . 37.05 |======================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 170.63 |======================================================== b . 170.37 |======================================================== c . 170.09 |======================================================== d . 204.80 |=================================================================== e . 204.68 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better a . 44.39 |==================================================================== b . 44.46 |==================================================================== c . 44.54 |==================================================================== d . 36.99 |======================================================== e . 37.01 |========================================================= Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Multi Core Score > Higher Is Better a . 9551 |===================================================================== b . 9553 |===================================================================== d . 8259 |============================================================ e . 8229 |=========================================================== Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Multi Core Integer Score > Higher Is Better a . 8905 |===================================================================== b . 8868 |===================================================================== d . 7659 |=========================================================== e . 7601 |=========================================================== Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Multi Core Floating Point Score > Higher Is Better a . 10877 |=================================================================== b . 10970 |==================================================================== d . 9501 |=========================================================== e . 9536 |=========================================================== Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Single Core Score > Higher Is Better a . 2450 |===================================================================== b . 2457 |===================================================================== d . 2317 |================================================================= e . 2310 |================================================================= Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Single Core Integer Score > Higher Is Better a . 2386 |===================================================================== b . 2391 |===================================================================== d . 2257 |================================================================= e . 2248 |================================================================= Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Single Core Floating Point Score > Higher Is Better a . 2574 |===================================================================== b . 2584 |===================================================================== d . 2432 |================================================================= e . 2430 |================================================================= GNU Octave Benchmark 6.4.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 5.978 |================================================================ b . 6.026 |================================================================= d . 6.292 |==================================================================== e . 6.317 |==================================================================== GROMACS 2023 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better a . 0.788 |==================================================================== b . 0.792 |==================================================================== d . 0.671 |========================================================== e . 0.667 |========================================================= HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 9.22430 |======================================================= b . 9.26427 |======================================================= c . 9.16944 |======================================================= d . 10.86330 |================================================================= e . 10.83640 |================================================================= HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 22.31 |================================================================ b . 22.32 |================================================================ c . 22.23 |================================================================ d . 23.75 |==================================================================== e . 23.71 |==================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 4.25314 |===================================================== b . 4.25839 |===================================================== c . 4.25222 |===================================================== d . 5.29165 |================================================================== e . 5.28367 |================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 9.02695 |======================================================== b . 8.97420 |======================================================= c . 8.97268 |======================================================= d . 10.51400 |================================================================= e . 10.49080 |================================================================= HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 8.37091 |======================================================= b . 8.36259 |======================================================= c . 8.32575 |======================================================= d . 9.98650 |================================================================== e . 9.95495 |================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 23.80 |================================================================ b . 23.82 |================================================================ c . 23.63 |================================================================ d . 25.13 |==================================================================== e . 24.85 |=================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 4.22813 |===================================================== b . 4.23400 |===================================================== c . 4.23098 |===================================================== d . 5.25616 |================================================================== e . 5.25237 |================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 8.87633 |====================================================== b . 8.85636 |====================================================== c . 8.86055 |====================================================== d . 10.64770 |================================================================= e . 10.62050 |================================================================= High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 104 104 104 - RT: 60 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 3.65237 |================================================================== b . 3.64924 |================================================================== c . 3.65082 |================================================================== d . 3.66688 |================================================================== e . 3.66849 |================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 0.34 |===================================================================== b . 0.34 |===================================================================== c . 0.34 |===================================================================== d . 0.25 |=================================================== e . 0.25 |=================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 0.34 |===================================================================== b . 0.34 |===================================================================== c . 0.34 |===================================================================== d . 0.25 |=================================================== e . 0.25 |=================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 0.16 |===================================================================== b . 0.16 |===================================================================== c . 0.16 |===================================================================== d . 0.12 |==================================================== e . 0.12 |==================================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: bcrypt Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 16056 |==================================================================== b . 16041 |==================================================================== c . 16056 |==================================================================== d . 11177 |=============================================== e . 11145 |=============================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: WPA PSK Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 67208 |==================================================================== b . 67242 |==================================================================== c . 67686 |==================================================================== d . 47984 |================================================ e . 47942 |================================================ John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 15830 |==================================================================== b . 15849 |==================================================================== c . 15787 |==================================================================== d . 11019 |=============================================== e . 11015 |=============================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: HMAC-SHA512 Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 85798000 |================================================================= b . 85790000 |================================================================= c . 85004000 |================================================================ d . 63018000 |================================================ e . 63043000 |================================================ John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 1553000 |================================================================== b . 1564000 |================================================================== c . 1556000 |================================================================== d . 1104000 |=============================================== e . 1099000 |============================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 6.72 |==================================================================== b . 6.79 |===================================================================== c . 6.74 |==================================================================== d . 4.77 |================================================ e . 4.76 |================================================ Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 16.91 |=================================================================== b . 17.04 |==================================================================== c . 17.03 |==================================================================== d . 12.11 |================================================ e . 12.12 |================================================ Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 21.14 |==================================================================== b . 21.23 |==================================================================== c . 21.05 |=================================================================== d . 14.96 |================================================ e . 14.99 |================================================ Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 29.37 |==================================================================== b . 29.35 |==================================================================== c . 29.31 |==================================================================== d . 20.92 |================================================ e . 20.89 |================================================ libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 81.91 |================================================== b . 81.96 |================================================== c . 81.75 |================================================== d . 108.93 |=================================================================== e . 109.62 |=================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 6 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 7.303 |============================================= b . 7.328 |============================================= c . 7.303 |============================================= d . 10.898 |=================================================================== e . 10.888 |=================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 11.87 |================================================= b . 11.58 |================================================ c . 11.59 |================================================ d . 16.47 |==================================================================== e . 16.44 |==================================================================== libxsmm 2-1.17-3645 M N K: 32 GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better a . 55.8 |==================================================================== b . 55.4 |==================================================================== c . 55.4 |==================================================================== d . 56.4 |===================================================================== e . 56.6 |===================================================================== libxsmm 2-1.17-3645 M N K: 64 GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better a . 110.2 |==================================================================== b . 109.4 |=================================================================== c . 109.5 |=================================================================== d . 110.0 |==================================================================== e . 110.4 |==================================================================== Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 54005000 |================================================================= b . 54017000 |================================================================= d . 50850000 |============================================================= e . 50829000 |============================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 86164000 |================================================================= b . 86235000 |================================================================= d . 81257000 |============================================================= e . 81272000 |============================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 199620000 |================================================================ b . 200200000 |================================================================ d . 177370000 |========================================================= e . 177750000 |========================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 260980000 |=============================================================== b . 265830000 |================================================================ d . 232090000 |======================================================== e . 227420000 |======================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 331140000 |================================================================ b . 331500000 |================================================================ d . 276670000 |===================================================== e . 277180000 |====================================================== Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 409640000 |============================================================== b . 419540000 |================================================================ d . 299170000 |============================================== e . 299160000 |============================================== Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 21614000 |================================================================= b . 21593000 |================================================================= d . 20307000 |============================================================= e . 20269000 |============================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 502810000 |=============================================================== b . 513440000 |================================================================ d . 361340000 |============================================= e . 361220000 |============================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 427490000 |=============================================================== b . 433120000 |================================================================ d . 308360000 |============================================== e . 308330000 |============================================== Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 79299000 |================================================================ b . 79964000 |================================================================= d . 71110000 |========================================================== e . 71098000 |========================================================== Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 131760000 |================================================================ b . 132110000 |================================================================ d . 100700000 |================================================= e . 99730000 |================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 162520000 |=============================================================== b . 165290000 |================================================================ d . 115700000 |============================================= e . 115710000 |============================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 104940000 |================================================================ b . 105040000 |================================================================ d . 98855000 |============================================================ e . 98751000 |============================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 147466667 |================================================================ b . 144810000 |=============================================================== d . 136380000 |=========================================================== e . 136420000 |=========================================================== Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 44031333 |================================================================= b . 44040000 |================================================================= d . 41039000 |============================================================= e . 41172000 |============================================================= LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better a . 4126.31 |================================================================= b . 4191.53 |================================================================== c . 4191.72 |================================================================== d . 1648.59 |========================== e . 1664.61 |========================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1.79 |=================================================================== b . 1.83 |===================================================================== c . 1.79 |=================================================================== d . 1.25 |=============================================== e . 1.27 |================================================ LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1.16 |===================================================================== b . 1.08 |================================================================ c . 1.09 |================================================================= d . 0.66 |======================================= e . 0.63 |===================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2.85 |===================================================================== b . 2.85 |===================================================================== c . 2.84 |===================================================================== d . 1.97 |================================================ e . 1.97 |================================================ LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1.30 |===================================================================== b . 1.29 |==================================================================== c . 1.29 |==================================================================== d . 0.78 |========================================= e . 0.78 |========================================= LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better a . 7.63 |===================================================================== b . 7.63 |===================================================================== c . 7.49 |==================================================================== d . 5.18 |=============================================== e . 5.07 |============================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2331 |===================================================================== b . 2331 |===================================================================== d . 1792 |===================================================== e . 1779 |===================================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1117 |===================================================================== b . 1111 |===================================================================== d . 842 |==================================================== e . 857 |===================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2339109.34 |============================================================== b . 2359355.53 |=============================================================== d . 1624284.67 |=========================================== e . 1640940.11 |============================================ Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2257435.18 |============================================================== b . 2294635.17 |=============================================================== d . 1565861.27 |=========================================== e . 1574207.88 |=========================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2205533.41 |=============================================================== b . 2212508.18 |=============================================================== d . 1555313.89 |============================================ e . 1560732.04 |============================================ miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 GFInst/s > Higher Is Better a . 381.97 |=================================================================== b . 380.11 |=================================================================== c . 377.48 |================================================================== d . 259.43 |============================================== e . 260.86 |============================================== miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 Billion Interactions/s > Higher Is Better a . 15.28 |==================================================================== b . 15.20 |==================================================================== c . 15.10 |=================================================================== d . 10.38 |============================================== e . 10.43 |============================================== miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Small CG Mflops > Higher Is Better a . 4060.69 |================================================================= b . 4041.13 |================================================================= c . 4041.49 |================================================================= d . 4107.77 |================================================================== e . 4110.93 |================================================================== NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better a . 1.84476 |============================================== b . 1.84751 |============================================== c . 1.84863 |============================================== d . 2.65403 |================================================================== e . 2.64431 |================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better e . 15.90 |==================================================================== a . 14.02 |============================================================ b . 14.02 |============================================================ d . 15.85 |==================================================================== e . 15.83 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better a . 3.52 |============================================================= b . 3.54 |============================================================= d . 3.96 |===================================================================== e . 3.98 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better e . 3.15 |===================================================================== a . 2.84 |============================================================== b . 2.85 |============================================================== d . 3.14 |===================================================================== e . 3.14 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better e . 2.32 |=================================================================== a . 2.18 |=============================================================== b . 2.18 |=============================================================== d . 2.38 |===================================================================== e . 2.30 |=================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better a . 2.54 |================================================================ b . 2.54 |================================================================ d . 2.76 |===================================================================== e . 2.76 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better e . 5.14 |=================================================================== a . 4.29 |======================================================== b . 4.30 |======================================================== d . 5.31 |===================================================================== e . 5.31 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better e . 0.84 |===================================================================== a . 0.79 |================================================================= b . 0.75 |============================================================== d . 0.82 |=================================================================== e . 0.83 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better e . 11.51 |==================================================================== a . 10.30 |============================================================= b . 10.07 |=========================================================== d . 11.55 |==================================================================== e . 11.48 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better e . 61.36 |==================================================================== a . 59.79 |================================================================== b . 59.88 |================================================================== d . 61.38 |==================================================================== e . 61.31 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better e . 9.05 |===================================================================== a . 8.01 |============================================================= b . 7.82 |============================================================ d . 9.03 |===================================================================== e . 9.00 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better e . 8.54 |===================================================================== a . 8.06 |================================================================= b . 7.85 |=============================================================== d . 8.55 |===================================================================== e . 8.52 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better a . 16.49 |====================================================== b . 16.36 |====================================================== d . 20.65 |==================================================================== e . 20.67 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better e . 26.40 |==================================================================== a . 23.76 |============================================================= b . 23.81 |============================================================= d . 26.39 |==================================================================== e . 26.35 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better e . 11.96 |==================================================================== a . 10.34 |=========================================================== b . 10.41 |=========================================================== d . 11.90 |==================================================================== e . 11.92 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better e . 7.78 |===================================================================== a . 6.82 |============================================================ b . 6.68 |=========================================================== d . 7.72 |==================================================================== e . 7.75 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: vision_transformer ms < Lower Is Better e . 90.05 |==================================================================== a . 72.05 |====================================================== b . 72.07 |====================================================== d . 89.85 |==================================================================== e . 90.07 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: FastestDet ms < Lower Is Better a . 3.52 |============================================================= b . 3.51 |============================================================= d . 3.97 |==================================================================== e . 4.00 |===================================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 68098.55 |================================================================ b . 68779.84 |================================================================= d . 47001.04 |============================================ e . 47003.02 |============================================ nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 61494.71 |================================================================= b . 61686.55 |================================================================= d . 43258.70 |============================================== e . 43482.87 |============================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 52883.38 |================================================================= b . 53009.35 |================================================================= d . 40695.40 |================================================== e . 40726.68 |================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 47841.37 |================================================================ b . 48357.65 |================================================================= d . 38750.55 |==================================================== e . 38521.51 |==================================================== Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 8850 |===================================================================== b . 8754 |==================================================================== c . 8814 |===================================================================== d . 8325 |================================================================= e . 8213 |================================================================ Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better a . 15.30 |==================================================================== b . 15.31 |==================================================================== d . 14.41 |================================================================ e . 14.30 |================================================================ Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better a . 571.01 |=================================================================== b . 574.91 |=================================================================== c . 564.42 |================================================================== d . 516.62 |============================================================ e . 517.71 |============================================================ OpenCV 4.7 Test: Core ms < Lower Is Better a . 55345 |=============================================================== b . 55182 |=============================================================== d . 58795 |=================================================================== e . 59340 |==================================================================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: Stitching ms < Lower Is Better a . 269695 |============================================================== b . 269533 |============================================================== d . 290303 |=================================================================== e . 290774 |=================================================================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: Image Processing ms < Lower Is Better a . 80674 |====================================================== b . 80783 |====================================================== d . 100448 |=================================================================== e . 99596 |================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size - Mesh Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 58.46 |=========================================================== b . 58.53 |=========================================================== c . 58.48 |=========================================================== d . 67.40 |==================================================================== e . 67.38 |==================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size - Execution Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 708.09 |=============================================================== b . 710.27 |=============================================================== c . 710.07 |=============================================================== d . 749.90 |=================================================================== e . 749.44 |=================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Mesh Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 439.65 |=========================================================== b . 441.61 |============================================================ c . 441.50 |============================================================ d . 496.74 |=================================================================== e . 496.10 |=================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Execution Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 5743.30 |================================================================ b . 5770.72 |================================================================= c . 5770.77 |================================================================= d . 5889.87 |================================================================== e . 5877.55 |================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Bumper Beam Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 210.90 |===================================================== b . 211.14 |===================================================== c . 211.84 |===================================================== d . 264.81 |================================================================== e . 267.00 |=================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Cell Phone Drop Test Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 154.27 |==================================================== b . 155.10 |==================================================== c . 154.84 |==================================================== d . 198.52 |=================================================================== e . 196.96 |================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Bird Strike on Windshield Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 385.29 |===================================================== b . 385.62 |===================================================== c . 386.90 |===================================================== d . 491.53 |=================================================================== e . 491.26 |=================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Rubber O-Ring Seal Installation Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 308.94 |======================================================= b . 310.44 |======================================================= c . 311.22 |======================================================= d . 377.00 |=================================================================== e . 378.10 |=================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 959.78 |======================================================== b . 961.47 |========================================================= c . 962.75 |========================================================= d . 1122.84 |================================================================== e . 1122.55 |================================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 7666522930 |=============================================================== b . 7571848920 |============================================================== c . 7670067840 |=============================================================== d . 5363079590 |============================================ e . 5371686670 |============================================ OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 2982380940 |=============================================================== b . 2971930440 |=============================================================== c . 2958467610 |============================================================== d . 2090214690 |============================================ e . 2073192130 |============================================ OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better a . 4750.7 |================================================================== b . 4803.9 |=================================================================== c . 4781.2 |=================================================================== d . 3304.7 |============================================== e . 3353.4 |=============================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better a . 155418.1 |================================================================= b . 155963.2 |================================================================= c . 155507.5 |================================================================= d . 109044.0 |============================================= e . 109117.9 |============================================= OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 53275943460 |============================================================== b . 53408719120 |============================================================== d . 37684059340 |============================================ e . 37631001400 |============================================ OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 104474526240 |============================================================= b . 103818760740 |============================================================= d . 73615414070 |=========================================== e . 74137558490 |=========================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 92098198730 |============================================================== b . 92618860950 |============================================================== d . 65168081990 |============================================ e . 65455871040 |============================================ OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 36073985910 |============================================================= b . 36372738320 |============================================================== d . 25772756170 |============================================ e . 25784432780 |============================================ OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 1.34 |===================================================================== b . 1.33 |==================================================================== d . 0.99 |=================================================== e . 0.98 |================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 2973.15 |================================================= b . 2976.94 |================================================= d . 4033.28 |================================================================== e . 4021.01 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 9.16 |===================================================================== b . 9.14 |===================================================================== d . 6.51 |================================================= e . 6.54 |================================================= OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 435.99 |================================================ b . 436.28 |================================================ d . 612.57 |=================================================================== e . 610.66 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 415.14 |================================================================== b . 419.36 |=================================================================== d . 311.26 |================================================== e . 309.25 |================================================= OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 9.62 |=================================================== b . 9.53 |================================================== d . 12.83 |==================================================================== e . 12.92 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 27.40 |==================================================================== b . 27.33 |==================================================================== d . 20.62 |=================================================== e . 20.64 |=================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 145.90 |================================================== b . 146.26 |=================================================== d . 193.94 |=================================================================== e . 193.60 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 907.43 |================================================================== b . 914.26 |=================================================================== d . 647.74 |=============================================== e . 648.80 |================================================ OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 8.79 |================================================================== b . 8.73 |================================================================= d . 9.24 |===================================================================== e . 9.23 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 214.40 |=================================================================== b . 213.56 |=================================================================== d . 172.78 |====================================================== e . 171.38 |====================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 18.64 |====================================================== b . 18.71 |======================================================= d . 23.13 |=================================================================== e . 23.32 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 8184.72 |================================================================== b . 8117.06 |================================================================= d . 5067.31 |========================================= e . 5049.65 |========================================= OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.97 |========================================================= b . 0.98 |========================================================== d . 1.16 |==================================================================== e . 1.17 |===================================================================== OpenVKL 1.3.1 Benchmark: vklBenchmark ISPC Items / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 154 |====================================================================== b . 155 |====================================================================== c . 154 |====================================================================== d . 117 |===================================================== e . 117 |===================================================== OpenVKL 1.3.1 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Scalar Items / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 69 |======================================================================= b . 69 |======================================================================= c . 69 |======================================================================= d . 52 |====================================================== e . 52 |====================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.72924 |================================================================= b . 3.77037 |================================================================== c . 3.74212 |================================================================== d . 2.67678 |=============================================== e . 2.67891 |=============================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.75234 |================================================================== b . 3.75720 |================================================================== c . 3.75544 |================================================================== d . 2.64427 |============================================== e . 2.66344 |=============================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 148.26 |=================================================================== b . 148.97 |=================================================================== c . 148.50 |=================================================================== d . 117.07 |===================================================== e . 117.26 |===================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.17345 |================================================================= b . 3.23141 |================================================================== c . 3.22055 |================================================================== d . 2.22151 |============================================= e . 2.25929 |============================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.17488 |================================================================== b . 3.18652 |================================================================== c . 3.19263 |================================================================== d . 2.22361 |============================================== e . 2.21786 |============================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.77067 |================================================================== b . 3.78168 |================================================================== c . 3.77000 |================================================================== d . 2.66212 |============================================== e . 2.65809 |============================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 2696 |================================================ b . 2704 |================================================ c . 2691 |================================================ d . 3894 |===================================================================== e . 3884 |===================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 3256 |================================================ b . 3263 |================================================ c . 3264 |================================================ d . 4702 |===================================================================== e . 4708 |===================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 42834 |============================================= b . 43011 |============================================= c . 42853 |============================================= d . 65121 |==================================================================== e . 65391 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 88765 |=============================================== b . 88710 |=============================================== c . 88742 |=============================================== d . 126949 |=================================================================== e . 127177 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 52071 |============================================= b . 52002 |============================================= c . 51903 |============================================= d . 78324 |==================================================================== e . 78221 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 107002 |=============================================== b . 106674 |============================================== c . 106444 |============================================== d . 153142 |=================================================================== e . 153814 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 443309 |=================================================================== b . 433312 |================================================================= d . 366216 |======================================================= e . 396674 |============================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.862 |=========================================== b . 0.914 |============================================== d . 1.275 |================================================================ e . 1.284 |================================================================ a . 1.128 |======================================================== b . 1.154 |========================================================= d . 1.365 |==================================================================== e . 1.260 |=============================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 516884 |=================================================================== b . 431809 |======================================================== d . 312923 |========================================= e . 322751 |========================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.900 |================================================ b . 1.934 |================================================ d . 2.716 |==================================================================== e . 2.151 |====================================================== a . 1.548 |======================================= b . 1.853 |============================================== d . 2.557 |================================================================ e . 2.479 |============================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 23466 |=================================================================== b . 23725 |==================================================================== d . 17896 |=================================================== e . 17875 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 21.37 |==================================================== b . 21.39 |==================================================== d . 28.14 |==================================================================== e . 27.96 |==================================================================== a . 21.31 |=================================================== b . 21.08 |=================================================== d . 27.94 |==================================================================== e . 27.97 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 17926 |==================================================================== b . 17895 |==================================================================== d . 13903 |===================================================== e . 13796 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 44.41 |==================================================== b . 44.35 |==================================================== d . 57.92 |==================================================================== e . 58.03 |==================================================================== a . 44.63 |==================================================== b . 44.71 |==================================================== d . 57.54 |=================================================================== e . 57.99 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency TPS > Higher Is Better a . 580068 |=================================================================== b . 546888 |=============================================================== d . 392256 |============================================= e . 389396 |============================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency TPS > Higher Is Better a . 421150 |=================================================================== b . 413607 |================================================================== d . 294566 |=============================================== e . 371978 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency TPS > Higher Is Better a . 23394 |==================================================================== b . 23377 |==================================================================== d . 17766 |==================================================== e . 17884 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency TPS > Higher Is Better a . 18016 |==================================================================== b . 18040 |==================================================================== d . 13811 |==================================================== e . 13786 |==================================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better a . 664 |================================================================= b . 662 |================================================================= d . 705 |===================================================================== e . 711 |====================================================================== QMCPACK 3.16 Input: Li2_STO_ae Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 301.65 |================================================= b . 300.84 |================================================= c . 296.75 |================================================ d . 411.70 |=================================================================== e . 408.56 |================================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2679816.88 |=============================================================== b . 2601146.17 |============================================================= d . 2242576.48 |===================================================== e . 2236074.90 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2630980.74 |=============================================================== b . 2475916.43 |=========================================================== d . 2145215.42 |=================================================== e . 2188722.61 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2627627.80 |=============================================================== b . 2625534.74 |=============================================================== d . 2265510.42 |====================================================== e . 2325921.50 |======================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2447990.86 |=============================================================== b . 2391013.39 |============================================================== d . 2058810.43 |===================================================== e . 2131409.25 |======================================================= Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2544206.44 |============================================================== b . 2565838.51 |=============================================================== d . 2218941.46 |====================================================== e . 2209577.35 |====================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2493512.81 |=============================================================== b . 2464830.47 |============================================================== d . 2092415.77 |===================================================== e . 2091970.43 |===================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2436216.00 |=================================================== b . 2981034.75 |=============================================================== d . 2307272.25 |================================================= e . 2654539.00 |======================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2854095.50 |=============================================================== b . 2857194.00 |=============================================================== d . 2633566.50 |========================================================== e . 2637178.25 |========================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 34626013 |================================================================ b . 35318074 |================================================================= d . 24785442 |============================================== e . 24860318 |============================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 487163 |================================================================== b . 493105 |=================================================================== d . 422807 |========================================================= e . 424647 |========================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 1716478 |================================================================== b . 1714690 |================================================================== d . 1195846 |============================================== e . 1181409 |============================================= RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 1527745 |================================================================= b . 1541034 |================================================================== d . 1133541 |================================================= e . 1133720 |================================================= SecureMark 1.0.4 Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS marks > Higher Is Better a . 341310 |=================================================================== b . 341164 |=================================================================== c . 341479 |=================================================================== d . 321452 |=============================================================== e . 320661 |=============================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better a . 4.00 |===================================================================== b . 4.01 |===================================================================== c . 4.02 |===================================================================== d . 3.83 |================================================================== e . 3.83 |================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better a . 8.70 |==================================================================== b . 8.81 |===================================================================== c . 8.83 |===================================================================== d . 8.29 |================================================================= e . 8.32 |================================================================= simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better a . 1.39 |===================================================================== b . 1.39 |===================================================================== c . 1.39 |===================================================================== d . 1.31 |================================================================= e . 1.31 |================================================================= simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better a . 7.22 |===================================================================== b . 7.23 |===================================================================== c . 7.22 |===================================================================== d . 6.80 |================================================================= e . 6.81 |================================================================= simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better a . 8.85 |==================================================================== b . 8.92 |==================================================================== c . 8.99 |===================================================================== d . 8.44 |================================================================= e . 8.34 |================================================================ SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Mount St. Helens Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 91.74 |=================================================== b . 90.65 |=================================================== c . 89.10 |================================================== d . 119.62 |=================================================================== e . 116.95 |================================================================== SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Layered Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 238.30 |=================================================== b . 240.62 |=================================================== c . 232.39 |================================================== d . 308.79 |================================================================== e . 314.22 |=================================================================== SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Tomographic Model Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 87.21 |================================================== b . 88.22 |================================================== c . 90.71 |==================================================== d . 117.92 |=================================================================== e . 117.07 |=================================================================== SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Homogeneous Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 113.86 |=================================================== b . 111.56 |================================================== c . 111.02 |================================================== d . 149.67 |=================================================================== e . 148.18 |================================================================== SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Water-layered Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 231.64 |===================================================== b . 234.44 |====================================================== c . 233.71 |====================================================== d . 292.05 |=================================================================== e . 291.60 |=================================================================== srsRAN Project 23.5 Test: Downlink Processor Benchmark Mbps > Higher Is Better a . 932.7 |==================================================================== b . 934.8 |==================================================================== c . 936.4 |==================================================================== d . 877.9 |================================================================ e . 874.0 |=============================================================== srsRAN Project 23.5 Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Total Mbps > Higher Is Better a . 1159.4 |=================================================================== b . 1083.3 |=============================================================== c . 1135.6 |================================================================== d . 859.1 |================================================== e . 893.4 |==================================================== srsRAN Project 23.5 Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Thread Mbps > Higher Is Better a . 312.5 |=================================================================== b . 317.9 |==================================================================== c . 317.1 |==================================================================== d . 299.4 |================================================================ e . 296.0 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Hash Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 1955106.16 |=============================================================== b . 1961600.56 |=============================================================== d . 1366987.38 |============================================ e . 1367363.94 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 150.43 |=================================================================== b . 150.47 |=================================================================== d . 82.73 |===================================== e . 82.62 |===================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 184.51 |=================================================================== b . 183.72 |=================================================================== d . 128.89 |=============================================== e . 128.60 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Pipe Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 9518302.94 |=============================================================== b . 9479547.03 |=============================================================== d . 6673465.49 |============================================ e . 6727843.20 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Poll Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 1216559.18 |=============================================================== b . 1217587.51 |=============================================================== d . 888258.13 |============================================== e . 889157.31 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Zlib Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 991.84 |=================================================================== b . 990.07 |=================================================================== d . 696.76 |=============================================== e . 696.36 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Futex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 2890357.12 |=============================================================== b . 2907882.78 |=============================================================== d . 2262823.27 |================================================= e . 2191737.45 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 432.67 |=================================================================== b . 435.20 |=================================================================== d . 292.31 |============================================= e . 293.49 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Mutex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 4984063.29 |=============================================================== b . 5005404.32 |=============================================================== d . 3450810.86 |=========================================== e . 3467345.32 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 414.05 |================================================================ b . 413.94 |================================================================ d . 431.36 |=================================================================== e . 383.76 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 15762.66 |================================================================= b . 15799.30 |================================================================= d . 10919.37 |============================================= e . 10913.01 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 5618945.41 |=============================================================== b . 5601667.95 |=============================================================== d . 2839408.38 |================================ e . 2832644.99 |================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Cloning Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 1111.25 |================================================================== b . 1117.68 |================================================================== d . 982.48 |========================================================== e . 985.80 |========================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 48219.80 |================================================================ b . 49261.36 |================================================================= d . 35834.63 |=============================================== e . 36127.91 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Pthread Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 141045.46 |================================================================ b . 141120.17 |================================================================ d . 113296.27 |=================================================== e . 112681.23 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: AVL Tree Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 52.30 |==================================================================== b . 51.79 |=================================================================== d . 42.23 |======================================================= e . 42.43 |======================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: IO_uring Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 258759.70 |================================================================ b . 260683.73 |================================================================ d . 228204.34 |======================================================== e . 226949.32 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 175089.34 |================================================================ b . 175023.65 |================================================================ d . 121031.59 |============================================ e . 120739.40 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 2781513.07 |=============================================================== b . 2662853.59 |============================================================ d . 2102565.10 |================================================ e . 2101251.45 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 20892.00 |================================================================= b . 20885.50 |================================================================= d . 14642.32 |============================================== e . 14594.47 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 17807994.42 |============================================================ b . 18253801.38 |============================================================== d . 11714133.77 |======================================== e . 13150807.44 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 50172.84 |================================================================= b . 50285.11 |================================================================= d . 35065.30 |============================================= e . 35424.21 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 48945.34 |================================================================= b . 48966.87 |================================================================= d . 34027.26 |============================================= e . 34020.49 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: AVX-512 VNNI Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 1023149.87 |=========================================================== b . 1088018.23 |=============================================================== d . 697973.77 |======================================== e . 764398.94 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Function Call Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 6049.55 |================================================================== b . 6071.93 |================================================================== d . 4203.63 |============================================== e . 4197.54 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: x86_64 RdRand Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 77558.23 |================================================================= b . 77557.27 |================================================================= d . 77585.80 |================================================================= e . 77586.34 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 2935.09 |================================================================== b . 2934.41 |================================================================== d . 2002.29 |============================================= e . 2018.68 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Matrix 3D Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 909.43 |================================================================== b . 901.49 |================================================================== d . 917.36 |=================================================================== e . 908.33 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 3176.42 |================================================================== b . 3191.79 |================================================================== d . 2232.15 |============================================== e . 2217.48 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Shuffle Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 74496.86 |================================================================ b . 75262.63 |================================================================= d . 53678.25 |============================================== e . 53538.10 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Mixed Scheduler Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 8499.14 |================================================================= b . 8674.56 |================================================================== d . 5959.30 |============================================= e . 5905.29 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 6575.45 |================================================================== b . 6566.50 |================================================================== d . 6144.60 |============================================================== e . 6157.94 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Wide Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 535128.11 |================================================================ b . 534062.66 |================================================================ d . 382456.62 |============================================== e . 385865.21 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 3654011.84 |=============================================================== b . 3638488.52 |=============================================================== d . 2531776.40 |============================================ e . 2527236.02 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Fused Multiply-Add Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 10256067.84 |============================================================== b . 10261026.71 |============================================================== d . 7172855.85 |=========================================== e . 7170053.45 |=========================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 24089.87 |================================================================= b . 24054.53 |================================================================= d . 17068.85 |============================================== e . 17338.18 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 7013916.66 |=============================================================== b . 7009619.95 |=============================================================== d . 4792580.04 |=========================================== e . 4856545.20 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 201.52 |================================================================== b . 203.66 |=================================================================== d . 141.99 |=============================================== e . 141.73 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 13144909.56 |============================================================== b . 13127961.92 |============================================================== d . 9811611.36 |============================================== e . 9823844.73 |============================================== SVT-AV1 1.6 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.141 |==================================================================== b . 3.126 |=================================================================== c . 3.151 |==================================================================== d . 2.332 |================================================== e . 2.328 |================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1.62 |===================================================================== b . 1.62 |===================================================================== c . 1.63 |===================================================================== d . 1.12 |=============================================== e . 1.12 |=============================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 33.42 |==================================================================== b . 33.09 |=================================================================== c . 33.42 |==================================================================== d . 24.34 |================================================== e . 23.99 |================================================= SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 65.83 |==================================================================== b . 65.85 |==================================================================== c . 65.60 |==================================================================== d . 50.63 |==================================================== e . 50.49 |==================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 42.65 |=================================================================== b . 42.84 |==================================================================== c . 43.07 |==================================================================== d . 37.09 |=========================================================== e . 36.22 |========================================================= SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 48.42 |==================================================================== b . 48.26 |==================================================================== c . 48.18 |==================================================================== d . 40.38 |========================================================= e . 40.10 |======================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 39.72 |==================================================================== b . 39.73 |==================================================================== c . 39.71 |==================================================================== d . 30.42 |==================================================== e . 30.41 |==================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 96.89 |==================================================================== b . 96.85 |==================================================================== d . 78.27 |======================================================= e . 78.48 |======================================================= TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 51.04 |==================================================================== b . 51.13 |==================================================================== d . 40.30 |====================================================== e . 40.36 |====================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 16.67 |==================================================================== b . 16.66 |==================================================================== d . 13.59 |======================================================= e . 13.58 |======================================================= Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 60.61 |================================================= b . 60.55 |================================================= c . 60.50 |================================================= d . 83.72 |==================================================================== e . 83.85 |==================================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1168.13 |================================================== b . 1168.61 |================================================== d . 1543.48 |================================================================== e . 1508.95 |================================================================= Timed Gem5 Compilation 21.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 474.37 |================================================== b . 473.64 |================================================== c . 473.50 |================================================== d . 637.91 |=================================================================== e . 637.95 |=================================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 473.85 |================================================= b . 473.67 |================================================= c . 472.94 |================================================= d . 645.97 |=================================================================== e . 647.15 |=================================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 113.44 |================================================ b . 112.91 |================================================ c . 112.90 |================================================ d . 158.08 |=================================================================== e . 158.37 |=================================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1535.84 |=============================================== b . 1533.81 |============================================== c . 1534.70 |============================================== d . 2178.33 |================================================================== e . 2179.75 |================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 981.61 |================================================ b . 981.03 |================================================ c . 980.75 |================================================ d . 1342.91 |================================================================== e . 1341.38 |================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 998.04 |================================================ b . 994.01 |================================================ c . 996.30 |================================================ d . 1364.90 |================================================================== e . 1359.48 |================================================================== Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 859.61 |================================================= b . 857.89 |================================================= c . 855.83 |================================================= d . 1156.86 |================================================================== e . 1158.41 |================================================================== Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 68.36 |==================================================== b . 68.54 |==================================================== c . 68.55 |==================================================== d . 88.36 |==================================================================== e . 88.80 |==================================================================== Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 61.38 |=================================================== b . 62.11 |==================================================== c . 62.08 |==================================================== d . 81.03 |=================================================================== e . 81.73 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 4.27 |===================================================================== b . 4.28 |===================================================================== c . 4.27 |===================================================================== d . 2.99 |================================================ e . 2.98 |================================================ uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 4.75 |===================================================================== b . 4.77 |===================================================================== c . 4.76 |===================================================================== d . 3.34 |================================================ e . 3.32 |================================================ uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 23.85 |=================================================================== b . 24.10 |==================================================================== c . 23.77 |=================================================================== d . 16.35 |============================================== e . 16.28 |============================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 26.93 |==================================================================== b . 26.83 |==================================================================== c . 26.79 |==================================================================== d . 18.21 |============================================== e . 18.17 |============================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 14.08 |==================================================================== b . 14.13 |==================================================================== c . 14.11 |==================================================================== d . 9.79 |=============================================== e . 9.78 |=============================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 14.70 |=================================================================== b . 14.81 |==================================================================== c . 14.71 |==================================================================== d . 10.28 |=============================================== e . 10.26 |=============================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 17.99 |==================================================================== b . 18.00 |==================================================================== c . 18.12 |==================================================================== d . 12.58 |=============================================== e . 12.55 |=============================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 69.50 |================================================================= b . 72.22 |==================================================================== c . 72.23 |==================================================================== d . 48.07 |============================================= e . 47.95 |============================================= uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 74.64 |==================================================================== b . 74.90 |==================================================================== c . 74.48 |==================================================================== d . 50.03 |============================================= e . 50.14 |============================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 96.33 |==================================================================== b . 95.58 |=================================================================== c . 93.03 |================================================================== d . 62.01 |============================================ e . 61.59 |=========================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.529 |==================================================================== b . 3.527 |==================================================================== c . 3.513 |==================================================================== d . 2.577 |================================================== e . 2.578 |================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 7.432 |==================================================================== b . 7.458 |==================================================================== c . 7.472 |==================================================================== d . 5.662 |==================================================== e . 5.637 |=================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 11.094 |================================================================== b . 11.236 |=================================================================== c . 11.257 |=================================================================== d . 8.313 |================================================= e . 8.306 |================================================= VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 25.34 |==================================================================== b . 25.47 |==================================================================== c . 25.42 |==================================================================== d . 19.62 |==================================================== e . 19.47 |==================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Default MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 20.20 |==================================================================== b . 20.17 |==================================================================== c . 20.19 |==================================================================== d . 19.00 |================================================================ e . 18.97 |================================================================ WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100 MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 12.94 |==================================================================== b . 12.95 |==================================================================== c . 12.96 |==================================================================== d . 12.20 |================================================================ e . 12.20 |================================================================ WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 1.87 |==================================================================== b . 1.86 |==================================================================== c . 1.89 |===================================================================== d . 1.78 |================================================================= e . 1.79 |================================================================= WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 4.29 |===================================================================== b . 4.29 |===================================================================== c . 4.28 |===================================================================== d . 4.05 |================================================================= e . 4.03 |================================================================= WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 0.71 |==================================================================== b . 0.71 |==================================================================== c . 0.72 |===================================================================== d . 0.64 |============================================================= e . 0.64 |============================================================= x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 11.51 |=================================================================== b . 11.73 |==================================================================== c . 11.56 |=================================================================== d . 10.49 |============================================================= e . 10.15 |=========================================================== x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 58.45 |================================================================== b . 59.97 |==================================================================== c . 59.70 |==================================================================== d . 50.06 |========================================================= e . 50.47 |========================================================= Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 44.70 |=============================================================== b . 44.90 |=============================================================== c . 44.89 |=============================================================== d . 48.47 |==================================================================== e . 46.80 |================================================================== Xmrig 6.18.1 Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better a . 1946.8 |=================================================================== b . 1934.8 |=================================================================== c . 1933.8 |=================================================================== d . 1792.1 |============================================================== e . 1798.3 |============================================================== Xmrig 6.18.1 Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better a . 3410.3 |=================================================================== b . 3349.9 |================================================================== c . 3418.8 |=================================================================== d . 2773.3 |====================================================== e . 2809.5 |======================================================= Z3 Theorem Prover 4.12.1 SMT File: 1.smt2 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 24.80 |============================================================== b . 24.96 |============================================================== c . 24.96 |============================================================== d . 27.26 |==================================================================== e . 27.07 |==================================================================== Z3 Theorem Prover 4.12.1 SMT File: 2.smt2 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 72.46 |================================================================ b . 71.44 |=============================================================== c . 71.35 |=============================================================== d . 77.37 |==================================================================== e . 76.57 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 12.3 |===================================================================== b . 12.3 |===================================================================== c . 12.3 |===================================================================== d . 11.0 |============================================================== e . 10.9 |============================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 1753.1 |================================================================== b . 1750.5 |================================================================== c . 1770.3 |=================================================================== d . 1616.3 |============================================================= e . 1614.4 |============================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 7.43 |===================================================================== b . 7.43 |===================================================================== c . 7.45 |===================================================================== d . 6.76 |=============================================================== e . 6.77 |=============================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 1638.7 |=================================================================== b . 1636.5 |=================================================================== c . 1643.8 |=================================================================== d . 1507.9 |============================================================= e . 1514.3 |==============================================================