hcloud_server_benchmark Hetzner Cloud CPX51 QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC: Processor: AMD EPYC (16 Cores), Motherboard: KVM Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9 2009) (20171111 BIOS), Memory: 16 GB + 15616 MB RAM, Disk: 369GB QEMU HDD, Graphics: virtio_gpudrmfb, Monitor: QEMU Monitor OS: Fedora Linux 38, Kernel: 6.4.10-200.fc38.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.1 20230728, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: KVM Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 627.93 |================================================= Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 179.35 |================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 15.3 |=================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 63590.50 |=============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 13.0 |=================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 75787.40 |=============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 2.1 |==================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 47907.53 |=============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 12.2 |=================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 81181.02 |=============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 2.1 |==================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 47067.87 |=============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 1.9 |==================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 52435.98 |=============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 15.3 |=================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 63329.03 |=============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 12.9 |=================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 76275.14 |=============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 2.1 |==================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 47627.04 |=============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 12.3 |=================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 80436.99 |=============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 2.1 |==================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 47150.34 |=============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 1.9 |==================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 52202.72 |=============================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 176.58 |================================================= ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 174.32 |================================================= ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 150.26 |================================================= Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 8.81 |=================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 34699165880 |============================================ OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 60629925887 |============================================ OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 65732300073 |============================================ OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 51847717047 |============================================ OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 223670.5 |=============================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 3385.9 |================================================= OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 5875209470 |============================================= OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 12639176357 |============================================ Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 0.00335175 |============================================= Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 0.19864180 |============================================= ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 1045565 |================================================ simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 3.78 |=================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 3.34 |=================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 0.85 |=================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 3.81 |=================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 2.56 |=================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 9487 |=================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 1467231 |================================================ SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better QEMU HDD - AMD EPYC . 8.330 |================================================== Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better