7f32 auggy AMD EPYC 7F32 8-Core testing with a ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.40 BIOS) and ASPEED on Debian 12 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: AMD EPYC 7F32 8-Core @ 3.70GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.40 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 28GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Intel I350 OS: Debian 12, Kernel: 6.1.0-11-amd64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Pipe Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 3614903.74 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Cloning Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 3007.62 |================================================================== Z3 Theorem Prover 4.12.1 SMT File: 2.smt2 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 83.38 |==================================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: AVL Tree Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 193.54 |=================================================================== Palabos 2.3 Grid Size: 400 Mega Site Updates Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 96.73 |==================================================================== Z3 Theorem Prover 4.12.1 SMT File: 1.smt2 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 35.61 |==================================================================== Palabos 2.3 Grid Size: 100 Mega Site Updates Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 53.06 |==================================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 2657.77 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Matrix 3D Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 1901.4 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Vector Shuffle Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 5584.28 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Wide Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 298848.42 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Fused Multiply-Add Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 18402206.32 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Vector Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 21418.83 |================================================================= BRL-CAD 7.36 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better a . 130600 |=================================================================== Opus Codec Encoding 1.4 WAV To Opus Encode Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 33.77 |==================================================================== Google Draco 1.5.6 Model: Lion ms < Lower Is Better a . 6192 |===================================================================== Google Draco 1.5.6 Model: Church Facade ms < Lower Is Better a . 8604 |===================================================================== eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 1.51 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 33.15 |==================================================================== nekRS 23.0 Input: Kershaw flops/rank > Higher Is Better a . 6387210000 |=============================================================== nekRS 23.0 Input: TurboPipe Periodic flops/rank > Higher Is Better a . 5139360000 |=============================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 58.64 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 69.31 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 79.2 |===================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 35.52 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 10.72 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 34.97 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 10.11 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 34.11 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 11.11 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better a . 20.38 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better a . 6.07 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better a . 5.21 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better a . 7.74 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better a . 5.42 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better a . 8.25 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better a . 2.86 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better a . 19.06 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better a . 54.95 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better a . 12.28 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better a . 8.58 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better a . 26.09 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better a . 34.28 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better a . 16.05 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better a . 15.12 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: vision_transformer ms < Lower Is Better a . 123.02 |=================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: FastestDet ms < Lower Is Better a . 9.04 |===================================================================== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 104 104 104 - RT: 60 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 11.38 |==================================================================== Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2.02.73.3 Input: Gas HII40 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 19.03 |==================================================================== Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2.02.73.3 Input: Dust 2D tau100.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 114.68 |=================================================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: bcrypt Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 12638 |==================================================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: WPA PSK Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 27630 |==================================================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 12639 |==================================================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: HMAC-SHA512 Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 26787000 |================================================================= John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 873216 |=================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 922.81 |=================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 951.86 |=================================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1345.43 |================================================================== dav1d 1.2.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better a . 411.49 |=================================================================== dav1d 1.2.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better a . 174.69 |=================================================================== dav1d 1.2.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better a . 596.76 |=================================================================== dav1d 1.2.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better a . 381.56 |=================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.6 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2.899 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.6 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 27.47 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.6 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 76.03 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.6 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 77.15 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.6 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 9.643 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.6 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 69.12 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.6 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 235.49 |=================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.6 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 319.41 |=================================================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 162.09 |=================================================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 439.02 |=================================================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 197.83 |=================================================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 515.22 |=================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.396 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 7.496 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 11.59 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 24.30 |==================================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 471.29 |=================================================================== Embree 4.1 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 9.6609 |=================================================================== Embree 4.1 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 8.6906 |=================================================================== Embree 4.1 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 10.60 |==================================================================== Embree 4.1 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 9.4519 |=================================================================== Embree 4.1 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 10.10 |==================================================================== Embree 4.1 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 8.6709 |=================================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2.49465 |================================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2.46635 |================================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 82.31 |==================================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1.09377 |================================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1.035 |==================================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1.95772 |================================================================== Build2 0.15 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 183.79 |=================================================================== Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 740.15 |=================================================================== Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 39519000 |================================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 46870000 |================================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 79171000 |================================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 93765000 |================================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 158440000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 187580000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 316090000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 374950000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 9486400 |================================================================== Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 570050000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 465040000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 18968000 |================================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 37937000 |================================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 75846000 |================================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 130920000 |================================================================ srsRAN Project 23.5 Test: Downlink Processor Benchmark Mbps > Higher Is Better a . 701.3 |==================================================================== srsRAN Project 23.5 Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Total Mbps > Higher Is Better a . 1647.3 |=================================================================== srsRAN Project 23.5 Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Thread Mbps > Higher Is Better a . 196.5 |==================================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 40076.35 |================================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 39847.47 |================================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 39333.16 |================================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 37529.73 |================================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 44991.53 |================================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 54367.92 |================================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 54809.57 |================================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 55327.55 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 600829.3 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 18.72 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 983316.37 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 36.1 |===================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 748818.64 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 19.35 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1168260.13 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 35.51 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1002583.4 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 16.72 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1399726.64 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 32.25 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 27587189.31 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 55.72 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 32441581.64 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 126.58 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 33593340.79 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 50.24 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 34328915.14 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 127.17 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 35013307.96 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 50.47 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 18598763.25 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 248.04 |=================================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2538325.71 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3275991.66 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3659893.09 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3946465.72 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2402261.27 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3163170.24 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3321948.85 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3424020.91 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2506907.52 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3212363.14 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 4117468.93 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3452977.05 |=============================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 993331 |=================================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 940734.15 |================================================================ Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 931730.76 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2040322.66 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2018414.51 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2017695.34 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1945812.57 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2053395.26 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1973631.1 |================================================================ SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 34.76 |==================================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 33842361 |================================================================= RocksDB 8.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 278892 |=================================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 1404271 |================================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 981638 |=================================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better