AMD EPYC 7763 1P spec_rstack_overflow

Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article looking at AMD Inception impact.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2308109-NE-EPYC7763169
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results
Show Result Confidence Charts

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Timed Code Compilation 4 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 6 Tests
CPU Massive 12 Tests
Creator Workloads 6 Tests
Database Test Suite 10 Tests
Game Development 3 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 11 Tests
Java Tests 4 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 2 Tests
Linear Algebra 2 Tests
Machine Learning 4 Tests
Molecular Dynamics 3 Tests
MPI Benchmarks 2 Tests
Multi-Core 16 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 2 Tests
Intel oneAPI 4 Tests
OpenMPI Tests 7 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 6 Tests
Python Tests 8 Tests
Renderers 2 Tests
Scientific Computing 6 Tests
Server 11 Tests
Server CPU Tests 8 Tests
Single-Threaded 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
off
August 10 2023
  9 Hours, 10 Minutes
safe RET no microcode
August 09 2023
  9 Hours, 26 Minutes
safe RET
August 10 2023
  9 Hours, 17 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  9 Hours, 18 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

AMD EPYC 7763 1P spec_rstack_overflow Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article looking at AMD Inception impact. off: Processor: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core @ 2.45GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: AMD DAYTONA_X (RYM1009B BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 800GB INTEL SSDPF21Q800GB, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Mellanox MT27710 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.0-rc5-phx-tues (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.5, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Vulkan: 1.3.224, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0 + LLVM 14.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 safe RET no microcode: Processor: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core @ 2.45GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: AMD DAYTONA_X (RYM1009B BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 800GB INTEL SSDPF21Q800GB, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Mellanox MT27710 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.0-rc5-phx-tues (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.5, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Vulkan: 1.3.224, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0 + LLVM 14.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 safe RET: Processor: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core @ 2.45GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: AMD DAYTONA_X (RYM1009B BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 800GB INTEL SSDPF21Q800GB, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Mellanox MT27710 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.0-rc5-phx-tues (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.5, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Vulkan: 1.3.224, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0 + LLVM 14.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better off ................... 4193 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 4191 |================================================ safe RET .............. 4241 |================================================= DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better off ................... 3993 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 4096 |================================================ safe RET .............. 4143 |================================================= OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Bumper Beam Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 87.72 |============================================= safe RET no microcode . 93.68 |================================================ safe RET .............. 93.90 |================================================ OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Cell Phone Drop Test Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 33.10 |============================================ safe RET no microcode . 36.37 |================================================ safe RET .............. 36.40 |================================================ OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Bird Strike on Windshield Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 144.83 |============================================= safe RET no microcode . 152.91 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 152.27 |=============================================== SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Homogeneous Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 17.42 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 17.64 |================================================ safe RET .............. 17.69 |================================================ SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Water-layered Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 29.77 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 30.43 |================================================ safe RET .............. 29.59 |=============================================== SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Layered Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 31.85 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 31.83 |================================================ safe RET .............. 31.66 |================================================ SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Tomographic Model Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 14.13 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 14.40 |================================================ safe RET .............. 14.19 |=============================================== Remhos 1.0 Test: Sample Remap Example Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 17.38 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 17.79 |================================================ safe RET .............. 17.96 |================================================ SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Mount St. Helens Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 11.80 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 11.98 |================================================ safe RET .............. 12.01 |================================================ OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Rubber O-Ring Seal Installation Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 77.46 |============================================ safe RET no microcode . 85.04 |================================================ safe RET .............. 84.48 |================================================ OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 162.13 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 163.02 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 163.97 |=============================================== Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 136.69 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 137.52 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 138.85 |=============================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 17.78 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 15.56 |========================================== safe RET .............. 15.65 |========================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better off ................... 457.23 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 418.95 |=========================================== safe RET .............. 422.58 |=========================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 37.60 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 37.70 |================================================ safe RET .............. 37.63 |================================================ Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better off ................... 839.72 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 840.77 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 840.42 |=============================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Sentiment Analysis, 80% Pruned Quantized BERT Base Uncased - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 487.25 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 485.01 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 487.37 |=============================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Sentiment Analysis, 80% Pruned Quantized BERT Base Uncased - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better off ................... 65.59 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 65.89 |================================================ safe RET .............. 65.57 |================================================ Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: ResNet-50, Baseline - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 468.83 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 468.36 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 468.22 |=============================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: ResNet-50, Baseline - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better off ................... 68.15 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 68.26 |================================================ safe RET .............. 68.23 |================================================ Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: ResNet-50, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 3840.63 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 3816.77 |============================================== safe RET .............. 3834.24 |============================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: ResNet-50, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better off ................... 8.3078 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 8.3612 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 8.3219 |=============================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 46.70 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 46.72 |================================================ safe RET .............. 46.57 |================================================ Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better off ................... 678.93 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 679.58 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 682.21 |=============================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: CV Segmentation, 90% Pruned YOLACT Pruned - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 53.60 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 53.60 |================================================ safe RET .............. 53.57 |================================================ Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: CV Segmentation, 90% Pruned YOLACT Pruned - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better off ................... 596.59 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 596.56 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 596.78 |=============================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 576.97 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 577.06 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 576.82 |=============================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better off ................... 55.39 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 55.37 |================================================ safe RET .............. 55.40 |================================================ GROMACS 2023 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better off ................... 5.680 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 5.730 |================================================ safe RET .............. 5.706 |================================================ NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better off ................... 0.38130 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 0.38115 |============================================== safe RET .............. 0.38098 |============================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better off ................... 7.68 |================================================= safe RET no microcode . 7.58 |================================================ safe RET .............. 7.60 |================================================ OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better off ................... 4092.91 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 4124.74 |============================================== safe RET .............. 4114.58 |============================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better off ................... 27.83 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 27.79 |================================================ safe RET .............. 27.82 |================================================ OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better off ................... 1141.43 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 1142.29 |============================================== safe RET .............. 1142.53 |============================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better off ................... 1126.03 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 1126.64 |============================================== safe RET .............. 1126.14 |============================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better off ................... 28.40 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 28.38 |================================================ safe RET .............. 28.39 |================================================ ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better off ................... 24.20 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 24.70 |================================================ safe RET .............. 23.70 |============================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better off ................... 1011799000 |=========================================== safe RET no microcode . 999645400 |========================================== safe RET .............. 999102100 |========================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Mesh Time Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 140.62 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 145.06 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 144.02 |=============================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Execution Time Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 633.52 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 644.36 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 643.71 |=============================================== 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better off ................... 384374 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 334812 |========================================= safe RET .............. 335595 |========================================= 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better off ................... 385585 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 383039 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 383515 |=============================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 176.37 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 182.17 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 181.53 |=============================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 31.19 |======================================== safe RET no microcode . 37.62 |================================================ safe RET .............. 37.24 |================================================ Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 289.06 |======================================= safe RET no microcode . 344.24 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 338.16 |============================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 27.34 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 27.58 |================================================ safe RET .............. 27.46 |================================================ Blender 3.6 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 84.50 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 84.69 |================================================ safe RET .............. 84.49 |================================================ Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 121.95 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 125.66 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 125.06 |=============================================== Embree 4.1 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better off ................... 57.42 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 57.30 |================================================ safe RET .............. 57.31 |================================================ Embree 4.1 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better off ................... 64.60 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 64.39 |================================================ safe RET .............. 64.67 |================================================ OpenVKL 1.3.1 Benchmark: vklBenchmark ISPC Items / Sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 453 |================================================== safe RET no microcode . 452 |================================================== safe RET .............. 453 |================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better off ................... 18.02 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 18.03 |================================================ safe RET .............. 17.98 |================================================ OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better off ................... 17.75 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 17.73 |================================================ safe RET .............. 17.73 |================================================ OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better off ................... 157.83 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 155.17 |============================================== safe RET .............. 156.42 |=============================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better off ................... 8.96051 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 8.96941 |============================================== safe RET .............. 8.94049 |============================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better off ................... 8.33174 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 8.32749 |============================================== safe RET .............. 8.33813 |============================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better off ................... 13.14 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 13.26 |================================================ safe RET .............. 13.25 |================================================ Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 164.27 |============================================= safe RET no microcode . 172.75 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 173.06 |=============================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better off ................... 169583.15 |============================================ safe RET no microcode . 144020.03 |===================================== safe RET .............. 142619.84 |===================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better off ................... 166499.89 |============================================ safe RET no microcode . 140555.98 |===================================== safe RET .............. 143271.26 |====================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 960525.66 |============================================ safe RET no microcode . 947741.34 |=========================================== safe RET .............. 918691.45 |========================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better off ................... 13.83 |============================================= safe RET no microcode . 14.05 |============================================== safe RET .............. 14.73 |================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 1271946.57 |========================================= safe RET no microcode . 1342031.11 |=========================================== safe RET .............. 1345598.59 |=========================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better off ................... 32.36 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 30.29 |============================================= safe RET .............. 30.14 |============================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 1176385.35 |========================================== safe RET no microcode . 1202637.36 |=========================================== safe RET .............. 1211172.13 |=========================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better off ................... 14.05 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 13.61 |============================================== safe RET .............. 13.36 |============================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 1415756.33 |====================================== safe RET no microcode . 1408658.83 |====================================== safe RET .............. 1583717.62 |=========================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better off ................... 31.49 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 31.93 |================================================ safe RET .............. 27.73 |========================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 43665846.28 |======================================= safe RET no microcode . 46538766.01 |========================================== safe RET .............. 44027904.89 |======================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better off ................... 37.70 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 35.10 |============================================= safe RET .............. 37.53 |================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 39463981.42 |========================================== safe RET no microcode . 37720117.40 |======================================== safe RET .............. 38833415.97 |========================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better off ................... 117.97 |============================================= safe RET no microcode . 123.61 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 120.06 |============================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 49501499.13 |========================================= safe RET no microcode . 47445770.18 |======================================= safe RET .............. 50578426.54 |========================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better off ................... 36.58 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 38.54 |================================================ safe RET .............. 35.82 |============================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 58682618.18 |========================================== safe RET no microcode . 58073516.79 |========================================== safe RET .............. 57099408.15 |========================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better off ................... 78.92 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 79.19 |============================================== safe RET .............. 82.24 |================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 3.39 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 3.42 |================================================ safe RET .............. 3.47 |================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 31.84 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 32.02 |================================================ safe RET .............. 31.43 |=============================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 4.91 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 5.17 |================================================= safe RET .............. 5.15 |================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 2.09 |=========================================== safe RET no microcode . 2.38 |================================================= safe RET .............. 2.26 |=============================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 1.88 |========================================= safe RET no microcode . 2.22 |================================================= safe RET .............. 2.14 |=============================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 1.30 |============================================= safe RET no microcode . 1.39 |================================================ safe RET .............. 1.41 |================================================= ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better off ................... 349.43 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 323.42 |============================================ safe RET .............. 318.12 |=========================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better off ................... 361.81 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 337.01 |============================================ safe RET .............. 337.12 |============================================ ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better off ................... 362.64 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 329.19 |=========================================== safe RET .............. 337.45 |============================================ CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better off ................... 103635.0 |============================================= safe RET no microcode . 100851.4 |============================================ safe RET .............. 99601.6 |=========================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better off ................... 135187.2 |============================================= safe RET no microcode . 131487.0 |============================================ safe RET .............. 132046.0 |============================================ Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 2204628.92 |=========================================== safe RET no microcode . 2218601.79 |=========================================== safe RET .............. 2145436.26 |========================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 2197287.30 |=========================================== safe RET no microcode . 2167181.09 |========================================== safe RET .............. 2145052.14 |========================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 2177211.80 |=========================================== safe RET no microcode . 2173694.77 |=========================================== safe RET .............. 2172804.71 |=========================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better off ................... 2195705.51 |=========================================== safe RET no microcode . 2154339.26 |========================================== safe RET .............. 2157815.69 |========================================== SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 3.755 |==================================== safe RET no microcode . 4.850 |=============================================== safe RET .............. 5.006 |================================================ SQLite 3.41.2 Threads / Copies: 16 Seconds < Lower Is Better off ................... 6.273 |================================== safe RET no microcode . 8.834 |================================================ safe RET .............. 8.800 |================================================ RocksDB 8.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better off ................... 462287 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 428112 |============================================ safe RET .............. 426947 |=========================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better off ................... 2951684 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 2872765 |============================================= safe RET .............. 2839085 |============================================ Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better off ................... 238741 |=============================================== safe RET no microcode . 233069 |============================================== safe RET .............. 236241 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better off ................... 3128719 |============================================== safe RET no microcode . 2707280 |======================================== safe RET .............. 2768445 |========================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better off ................... 0.256 |========================================== safe RET no microcode . 0.296 |================================================ safe RET .............. 0.289 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better off ................... 61604 |================================================ safe RET no microcode . 55175 |=========================================== safe RET .............. 54837 |=========================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better off ................... 12.99 |=========================================== safe RET no microcode . 14.50 |================================================ safe RET .............. 14.59 |================================================ MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 4096 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better off ................... 590 |================================================== safe RET no microcode . 412 |=================================== safe RET .............. 418 |=================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 8192 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better off ................... 355 |================================================== safe RET no microcode . 301 |========================================== safe RET .............. 301 |==========================================