AMD Ryzen 7 7840U testing with a PHX Ray_PEU (V1.04 BIOS) and GFX1103 512MB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2308054-NE-NEWT4354621
new t
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U testing with a PHX Ray_PEU (V1.04 BIOS) and GFX1103 512MB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
a:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U @ 3.30GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: PHX Ray_PEU (V1.04 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14e8, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1024GB Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH, Graphics: GFX1103 512MB (2700/800MHz), Audio: AMD Device 1640, Network: MEDIATEK Device 0616
OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.4.0-060400-generic (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.24.7, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.2.5-0ubuntu0.1~22.04.3 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.52), Vulkan: 1.3.224, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3200x2000
b:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U @ 3.30GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: PHX Ray_PEU (V1.04 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14e8, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1024GB Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH, Graphics: GFX1103 512MB (2700/800MHz), Audio: AMD Device 1640, Network: MEDIATEK Device 0616
OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.4.0-060400-generic (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.24.7, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.2.5-0ubuntu0.1~22.04.3 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.52), Vulkan: 1.3.224, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3200x2000
Apache Cassandra 4.1.3
Test: Writes
Op/s > Higher Is Better
a . 44343 |====================================================================
b . 44610 |====================================================================
Apache CouchDB 3.3.2
Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 81.50 |====================================================================
b . 81.18 |====================================================================
Apache CouchDB 3.3.2
Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 267.24 |===================================================================
b . 266.89 |===================================================================
Apache CouchDB 3.3.2
Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 134.34 |==================================================================
b . 136.36 |===================================================================
Apache CouchDB 3.3.2
Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 444.12 |===================================================================
b . 445.48 |===================================================================
Apache CouchDB 3.3.2
Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 238.90 |===================================================================
Apache CouchDB 3.3.2
Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 942.50 |===================================================================
Apache IoTDB 1.1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200
point/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 764198.22 |================================================================
b . 754295.46 |===============================================================
Apache IoTDB 1.1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200
Average Latency > Higher Is Better
a . 12.25 |===================================================================
b . 12.37 |====================================================================
Apache IoTDB 1.1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500
point/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 1434283.46 |=============================================================
b . 1469303.82 |===============================================================
Apache IoTDB 1.1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500
Average Latency > Higher Is Better
a . 20.89 |====================================================================
b . 20.15 |==================================================================
Apache IoTDB 1.1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200
point/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 1148481.56 |===============================================================
b . 1151261.34 |===============================================================
Apache IoTDB 1.1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200
Average Latency > Higher Is Better
a . 10.47 |====================================================================
b . 10.47 |====================================================================
Apache IoTDB 1.1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500
point/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 1904407.96 |===============================================================
b . 1902392.91 |===============================================================
Apache IoTDB 1.1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500
Average Latency > Higher Is Better
a . 19.26 |====================================================================
b . 19.29 |====================================================================
Apache IoTDB 1.1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200
point/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 31156415.06 |==============================================================
b . 30973284.30 |==============================================================
Apache IoTDB 1.1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200
Average Latency > Higher Is Better
a . 48.74 |===================================================================
b . 49.27 |====================================================================
Apache IoTDB 1.1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500
point/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 37173315.01 |==============================================================
b . 36760107.65 |=============================================================
Apache IoTDB 1.1.2
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500
Average Latency > Higher Is Better
a . 118.12 |===================================================================
b . 118.58 |===================================================================
Apache IoTDB 1.1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200
point/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 34027351.93 |============================================================
b . 35441446.08 |==============================================================
Apache IoTDB 1.1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200
Average Latency > Higher Is Better
a . 50.63 |====================================================================
b . 48.20 |=================================================================
Apache IoTDB 1.1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500
point/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 30434143.68 |=============================================================
b . 30869603.97 |==============================================================
Apache IoTDB 1.1.2
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500
Average Latency > Higher Is Better
a . 154.17 |===================================================================
b . 151.94 |==================================================================
BRL-CAD 7.36
VGR Performance Metric
VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better
a . 41630 |====================================================================
b . 41495 |====================================================================
Crypto++ 8.8
Test: Keyed Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
a . 819.76 |===================================================================
b . 815.60 |===================================================================
Crypto++ 8.8
Test: Unkeyed Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
a . 548.99 |===================================================================
b . 550.00 |===================================================================
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 1379888.16 |==========================================================
b . 1491166.66 |===============================================================
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 3840222.05 |===============================================================
b . 3831976.08 |===============================================================
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 3688737.76 |===============================================================
b . 3697778.34 |===============================================================
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 3586089.56 |==============================================================
b . 3624676.16 |===============================================================
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 1637117.07 |===============================================================
b . 1502494.92 |==========================================================
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 3869729.38 |==============================================================
b . 3922671.60 |===============================================================
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 3697587.29 |===============================================================
b . 3708754.43 |===============================================================
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 3591856.98 |===============================================================
b . 3600224.35 |===============================================================
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 1499036.96 |=============================================================
b . 1538274.60 |===============================================================
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 3937888.94 |==============================================================
b . 3970717.74 |===============================================================
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 3755227.91 |==============================================================
b . 3789965.37 |===============================================================
Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 3676368.91 |===============================================================
b . 3645464.56 |==============================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 27.50 |====================================================================
b . 27.43 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 8.32 |=====================================================================
b . 8.32 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 8.03 |=====================================================================
b . 8.03 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 5.82 |=====================================================================
b . 5.70 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 8.05 |=====================================================================
b . 8.01 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 11.35 |====================================================================
b . 11.31 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU - Model: blazeface
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 1.78 |=====================================================================
b . 1.78 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU - Model: googlenet
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 21.15 |====================================================================
b . 21.12 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU - Model: vgg16
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 75.37 |====================================================================
b . 75.36 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU - Model: resnet18
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 15.28 |====================================================================
b . 15.29 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU - Model: alexnet
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 11.63 |====================================================================
b . 11.68 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU - Model: resnet50
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 38.24 |===================================================================
b . 38.98 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 37.21 |===================================================================
b . 37.55 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 16.14 |====================================================================
b . 16.09 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 17.66 |====================================================================
b . 17.66 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU - Model: vision_transformer
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 290.59 |===================================================================
b . 290.71 |===================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: CPU - Model: FastestDet
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 4.19 |================================================================
b . 4.51 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mobilenet
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 27.61 |====================================================================
b . 27.52 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 8.36 |=====================================================================
b . 8.34 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 8.03 |=====================================================================
b . 8.04 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: shufflenet-v2
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 5.86 |=====================================================================
b . 5.83 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mnasnet
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 8.02 |=====================================================================
b . 8.04 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: efficientnet-b0
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 11.37 |====================================================================
b . 11.36 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: blazeface
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 1.79 |=====================================================================
b . 1.79 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: googlenet
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 21.15 |====================================================================
b . 21.18 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vgg16
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 75.36 |====================================================================
b . 75.37 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet18
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 15.31 |====================================================================
b . 15.30 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: alexnet
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 11.69 |====================================================================
b . 11.70 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet50
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 38.23 |====================================================================
b . 38.26 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: yolov4-tiny
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 37.46 |====================================================================
b . 37.23 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 16.06 |====================================================================
b . 16.09 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: regnety_400m
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 17.71 |====================================================================
b . 17.71 |====================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vision_transformer
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 291.38 |===================================================================
b . 289.97 |===================================================================
NCNN 20230517
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: FastestDet
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 4.38 |=====================================================================
b . 4.37 |=====================================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 3170726.69 |===============================================================
b . 2973746.29 |===========================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 3069952.67 |===============================================================
b . 2849758.37 |==========================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 3050497.79 |===============================================================
b . 3054116.42 |===============================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 2779173.08 |=============================================================
b . 2884149.30 |===============================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 2880502.94 |===============================================================
b . 2895297.95 |===============================================================
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 2847988.80 |=============================================================
b . 2918894.71 |===============================================================
Timed GCC Compilation 13.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 2640.78 |==================================================================
b . 2641.58 |==================================================================
VkFFT 1.2.31
Test: FFT + iFFT R2C / C2R
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
a . 141 |======================================================================
b . 142 |======================================================================
VkFFT 1.2.31
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in half precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
a . 259 |======================================================================
b . 259 |======================================================================
VkFFT 1.2.31
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C Bluestein in single precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
VkFFT 1.2.31
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in double precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
a . 218 |=====================================================================
b . 220 |======================================================================
VkFFT 1.2.31
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in single precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
a . 280 |======================================================================
b . 280 |======================================================================
VkFFT 1.2.31
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C multidimensional in single precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
a . 166 |=====================================================================
b . 168 |======================================================================
VkFFT 1.2.31
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C Bluestein benchmark in double precision
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
VkFFT 1.2.31
Test: FFT + iFFT C2C 1D batched in single precision, no reshuffling
Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better
a . 303 |======================================================================
b . 303 |======================================================================
vkpeak 20230730
fp32-scalar
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
a . 191.61 |===================================================================
b . 191.92 |===================================================================
vkpeak 20230730
fp32-vec4
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
a . 194.96 |===================================================================
b . 194.40 |===================================================================
vkpeak 20230730
fp16-scalar
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
a . 44.53 |====================================================================
b . 44.61 |====================================================================
vkpeak 20230730
fp16-vec4
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
a . 114.59 |===================================================================
b . 114.66 |===================================================================
vkpeak 20230730
fp64-scalar
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
a . 161.17 |===================================================================
b . 161.56 |===================================================================
vkpeak 20230730
fp64-vec4
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
a . 96.34 |====================================================================
b . 96.91 |====================================================================
vkpeak 20230730
int32-scalar
GIOPS > Higher Is Better
a . 269.09 |===================================================================
b . 269.36 |===================================================================
vkpeak 20230730
int32-vec4
GIOPS > Higher Is Better
a . 241.85 |==================================================================
b . 244.74 |===================================================================
vkpeak 20230730
int16-scalar
GIOPS > Higher Is Better
a . 267.34 |===================================================================
b . 267.27 |===================================================================
vkpeak 20230730
int16-vec4
GIOPS > Higher Is Better
a . 708.28 |===================================================================
b . 709.85 |===================================================================
VkResample 1.0
Upscale: 2x - Precision: Single
ms < Lower Is Better
VVenC 1.9
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 1.154 |====================================================================
b . 1.155 |====================================================================
VVenC 1.9
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 2.418 |===================================================================
b . 2.441 |====================================================================
VVenC 1.9
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 3.731 |====================================================================
b . 3.737 |====================================================================
VVenC 1.9
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Faster
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 8.466 |====================================================================
b . 8.494 |====================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1
Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 4847.12 |====================================================
b . 6161.63 |==================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16
Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 5085.19 |========================================================
b . 6018.89 |==================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32
Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 5128.71 |==================================================================
b . 4674.10 |============================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1
Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 5042.93 |===================================================
b . 6576.40 |==================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1
Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 6087.76 |==================================================================
b . 4312.29 |===============================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16
Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 51050.66 |=================================================================
b . 48138.55 |=============================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32
Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 32899.69 |=============================================
b . 47496.53 |=================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16
Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 42448.33 |=================================================================
b . 25837.10 |========================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32
Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 58589.84 |=================================================================
b . 53696.74 |============================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1
Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 4966.57 |==================================================================
b . 4678.43 |==============================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 1
Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 6052.40 |=================================================================
b . 6184.37 |==================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16
Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 26474.34 |============================================================
b . 28523.23 |=================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32
Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 38593.13 |================================================================
b . 39107.77 |=================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1
Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 5369.55 |============================================================
b . 5918.62 |==================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1
Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 4117.93 |=============================================================
b . 4467.15 |==================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 16
Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 48848.26 |=================================================================
b . 42497.31 |=========================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 1 - Num Threads Read: 32
Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 38485.27 |===============================================================
b . 39864.58 |=================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 1
Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 5195.87 |==================================================================
b . 4712.61 |============================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1
Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 4562.18 |======================================================
b . 5622.46 |==================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16
Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 50925.69 |=================================================================
b . 50394.90 |================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32
Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 32758.11 |=============================================
b . 47245.32 |=================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32
Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 7436.82 |==================================================================
b . 2367.74 |=====================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16
Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 52428.30 |===================================================
b . 66912.26 |=================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32
Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 42619.03 |========================================
b . 68865.02 |=================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 16
Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 27192.29 |=======================
b . 76398.39 |=================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 16 - Num Threads Read: 32
Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 34204.91 |================================================================
b . 34813.01 |=================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16
Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 42063.16 |=================================================================
b . 19662.00 |==============================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32
Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 24786.46 |====================================================
b . 30787.11 |=================================================================
YugabyteDB 2.19
Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32
Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
b . 76379.98 |=================================================================