Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2308041-NE-ITUIETST358
ituietst326-92.1
ituietst326-92.1
ituietst326-92.1:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226 @ 3.70GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: Cisco UCSC-C220-M5SX (C220M5.4.1.3m.0.0708220050 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 12 x 16384 MB DDR4-2934MT/s 18ASF2G72PZ-2G9E1, Disk: 2396GB UCSC-RAID12G-2GB + 12 x 54GB FlashArray, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot], Network: Cisco VIC NIC
OS: CentOS 7.9.2009, Kernel: 3.10.0-1160.90.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210130, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
LevelDB 1.23
Benchmark: Hot Read
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
LevelDB 1.23
Benchmark: Fill Sync
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
LevelDB 1.23
Benchmark: Overwrite
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
LevelDB 1.23
Benchmark: Random Fill
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
LevelDB 1.23
Benchmark: Random Read
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
LevelDB 1.23
Benchmark: Seek Random
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
LevelDB 1.23
Benchmark: Random Delete
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
LevelDB 1.23
Benchmark: Sequential Fill
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
PostMark 1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 3538 |======================================================
Tinymembench 2018-05-28
Standard Memcpy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 5815.8 |====================================================
Tinymembench 2018-05-28
Standard Memset
MB/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 11592.5 |===================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 4731.48 |===================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 4679.24 |===================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 4713.17 |===================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 4771.84 |===================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 4711.84 |===================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2888.15 |===================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2874.71 |===================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2881.13 |===================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2770.17 |===================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2874.98 |===================================================
t-test1 2017-01-13
Threads: 1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 26.97 |=====================================================
t-test1 2017-01-13
Threads: 2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 9.284 |=====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0674 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0827 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0822 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0842 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0862 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0909 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.1083 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0291 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0295 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0309 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0312 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0324 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0321 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0366 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0339 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0345 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0445 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0381 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0394 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0496 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0777 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0821 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.1082 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.1122 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.1140 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.1138 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.1153 |====================================================
pmbench
Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes
us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.1286 |====================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1
us < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 41.87 |=====================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8
us < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 41.25 |=====================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32
us < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 40.13 |=====================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64
us < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 41.21 |=====================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1
Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 16.01 |=====================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8
Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 100.33 |====================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1
Packets/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 135375 |====================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8
Packets/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1144267 |===================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32
Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 191.00 |====================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64
Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 200.60 |====================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32
Packets/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2339867 |===================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64
Packets/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2462533 |===================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1
Connections/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 10646 |=====================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8
Connections/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 29032 |=====================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32
Connections/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 26961 |=====================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64
Connections/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 24834 |=====================================================
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 100 |=======================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1000 |======================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 3200 |======================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 6400 |======================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 31991 |=====================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 31987 |=====================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 49816 |=====================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1.05 |======================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 49479 |=====================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 33951 |=====================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 33.6 |======================================================
iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 67.2 |======================================================
WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test
Seconds < Lower Is Better
perf-bench
Benchmark: Epoll Wait
ops/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 8121 |======================================================
perf-bench
Benchmark: Futex Hash
ops/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1263836 |===================================================
perf-bench
Benchmark: Memcpy 1MB
GB/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 16.45 |=====================================================
perf-bench
Benchmark: Memset 1MB
GB/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 56.29 |=====================================================
perf-bench
Benchmark: Sched Pipe
ops/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 134663 |====================================================
perf-bench
Benchmark: Futex Lock-Pi
ops/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 176 |=======================================================
perf-bench
Benchmark: Syscall Basic
ops/sec > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 3643138 |===================================================
OSBench
Test: Create Files
us Per Event < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 37.86 |=====================================================
OSBench
Test: Create Threads
us Per Event < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 22.85 |=====================================================
OSBench
Test: Launch Programs
us Per Event < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 254.74 |====================================================
OSBench
Test: Create Processes
us Per Event < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 45.84 |=====================================================
OSBench
Test: Memory Allocations
Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 105.45 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 743335 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 834777 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 806141 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 739186 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 635611 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 520761 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 735279 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 699664 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 701939 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 697203 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 611157 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 599960 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 500803 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 494068 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 495408 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 480444 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 453655 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 400503 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 624103 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 613799 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 604010 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 578503 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 537162 |====================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 467828 |====================================================
Hackbench
Count: 1 - Type: Thread
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 8.120 |=====================================================
Hackbench
Count: 2 - Type: Thread
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 15.36 |=====================================================
Hackbench
Count: 4 - Type: Thread
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 30.00 |=====================================================
Hackbench
Count: 8 - Type: Thread
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 59.33 |=====================================================
Hackbench
Count: 1 - Type: Process
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 8.457 |=====================================================
Hackbench
Count: 16 - Type: Thread
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 117.53 |====================================================
Hackbench
Count: 2 - Type: Process
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 15.10 |=====================================================
Hackbench
Count: 32 - Type: Thread
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 235.13 |====================================================
Hackbench
Count: 4 - Type: Process
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 30.12 |=====================================================
Hackbench
Count: 8 - Type: Process
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 58.20 |=====================================================
Hackbench
Count: 16 - Type: Process
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 116.77 |====================================================
Hackbench
Count: 32 - Type: Process
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 232.04 |====================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: SHA256
byte/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 6956024847 |================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: SHA512
byte/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 7339119477 |================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: RSA4096
sign/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 6159.4 |====================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: RSA4096
verify/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 409181.5 |==================================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: ChaCha20
byte/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 115410673207 |==============================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: AES-128-GCM
byte/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 120582180503 |==============================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: AES-256-GCM
byte/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 91003690553 |===============================================
OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305
byte/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 61593634767 |===============================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 42638 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.023 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 173 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 5.781 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1316669 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.038 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1312654 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.076 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1312434 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.191 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 174 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 287.72 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1261724 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.396 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1233499 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.649 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 37270 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.027 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 174 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 575.89 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1208232 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.828 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 173 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1444.78 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 161 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 3102.16 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 838648 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 5.962 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 147 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 5497.66 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 221 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 4.525 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1210898 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.041 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 30511 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.033 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 133 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 7651.18 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 99 |========================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 51323.88 |==================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1185990 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.084 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1148130 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.218 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1435 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 34.84 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1066011 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.469 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1027288 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.779 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 299 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 3.348 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 881609 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.057 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 22650 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.139 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 204 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 4.901 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1233 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 81.09 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1014745 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.986 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1983 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 126.06 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1851 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 276.55 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 680249 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 7.350 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1819 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 447.96 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 793011 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.126 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 717628 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.348 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 697 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 72.11 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 666891 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.750 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 615643 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1.299 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 276 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 3.636 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 668489 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.075 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 119 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 8.411 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2513 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 19.90 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1737 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 587.01 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1689 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2961.13 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 966 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 105.80 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 583930 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1.713 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1298 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 194.65 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1848 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 276.02 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 417739 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 11.97 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2071 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 393.63 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 505296 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.198 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 502014 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 0.498 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 768 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 65.24 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 465373 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1.075 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 436137 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1.835 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 3054 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 32.75 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 3303 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 75.69 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 511 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 97.97 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 3437 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 145.47 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 3432 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 233.10 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2333 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 434.21 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2162 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2325.86 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 893 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 112.84 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 413355 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2.419 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1095 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 229.39 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1693 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 297.69 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 26129 |=====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 278.42 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2088 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 385.53 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 596 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 167.90 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 3387 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 295.24 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 838 |=======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 298.41 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1237 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 409.39 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 3443 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1452.11 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1723 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 465.14 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1923 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 530.20 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2514 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2010.32 |===================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1719 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 582.14 |====================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1671 |======================================================
PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 3100.31 |===================================================
SQLite Speedtest 3.30
Timed Time - Size 1,000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 95.36 |=====================================================
BenchmarkMutex
Benchmark: Shared Mutex Lock Shared
ns < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 37.0 |======================================================
BenchmarkMutex
Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock
ns < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 33.5 |======================================================
BenchmarkMutex
Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex
ns < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 35.1 |======================================================
BenchmarkMutex
Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex
ns < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 22.6 |======================================================
BenchmarkMutex
Benchmark: Semaphore Release And Acquire
ns < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 18.5 |======================================================
BenchmarkMutex
Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock_amd
ns < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 35.4 |======================================================
BenchmarkMutex
Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock pthread_mutex
ns < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 19.3 |======================================================
BenchmarkMutex
Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock ticket_spinlock
ns < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 22.2 |======================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Hash
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 4321865.38 |================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: MMAP
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1466.82 |===================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: NUMA
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 38.24 |=====================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Pipe
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2702716.62 |================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Poll
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1989771.53 |================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Zlib
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1554.59 |===================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Futex
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1879.40 |===================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: MEMFD
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Mutex
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 421235.54 |=================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Atomic
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 161.11 |====================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Crypto
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 27479.95 |==================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Malloc
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 26560150.11 |===============================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Cloning
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 8775.67 |===================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Forking
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 7667.71 |===================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Pthread
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 89089.67 |==================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: AVL Tree
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 182.40 |====================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: IO_uring
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: SENDFILE
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 525623.73 |=================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: CPU Cache
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 1683073.22 |================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: CPU Stress
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 45781.04 |==================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Semaphores
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 31929174.94 |===============================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Matrix Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 124469.94 |=================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Vector Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 79625.89 |==================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Function Call
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 13806.55 |==================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: x86_64 RdRand
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 500991.76 |=================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Floating Point
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 5068.92 |===================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Matrix 3D Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 4378.40 |===================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Memory Copying
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 6367.20 |===================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Vector Shuffle
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 14915.65 |==================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Socket Activity
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 18232.07 |==================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Wide Vector Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 921075.93 |=================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Context Switching
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 2735965.85 |================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Fused Multiply-Add
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 20321632.52 |===============================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Vector Floating Point
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 48747.21 |==================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Glibc C String Functions
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 9558194.24 |================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 420.76 |====================================================
Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: System V Message Passing
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 3096853.94 |================================================
ctx_clock
Context Switch Time
Clocks < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 705 |=======================================================
RocksDB 8.0
Test: Random Fill
Op/s > Higher Is Better
RocksDB 8.0
Test: Random Read
Op/s > Higher Is Better
RocksDB 8.0
Test: Update Random
Op/s > Higher Is Better
RocksDB 8.0
Test: Sequential Fill
Op/s > Higher Is Better
RocksDB 8.0
Test: Random Fill Sync
Op/s > Higher Is Better
RocksDB 8.0
Test: Read While Writing
Op/s > Higher Is Better
RocksDB 8.0
Test: Read Random Write Random
Op/s > Higher Is Better
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
Concurrent Requests: 4
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
Concurrent Requests: 20
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
Concurrent Requests: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 38975.16 |==================================================
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
Concurrent Requests: 200
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 40949.53 |==================================================
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
Concurrent Requests: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 129421.33 |=================================================
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
Concurrent Requests: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 149296.68 |=================================================
Schbench 2021-09-09
Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4
usec, 50.0th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 29 |========================================================
Schbench 2021-09-09
Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4
usec, 75.0th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 60 |========================================================
Schbench 2021-09-09
Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4
usec, 90.0th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 94 |========================================================
Schbench 2021-09-09
Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4
usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better
ituietst326-92.1 . 14571 |=====================================================