ituietst326-92.1 ituietst326-92.1 ituietst326-92.1: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226 @ 3.70GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: Cisco UCSC-C220-M5SX (C220M5.4.1.3m.0.0708220050 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 12 x 16384 MB DDR4-2934MT/s 18ASF2G72PZ-2G9E1, Disk: 2396GB UCSC-RAID12G-2GB + 12 x 54GB FlashArray, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot], Network: Cisco VIC NIC OS: CentOS 7.9.2009, Kernel: 3.10.0-1160.90.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210130, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 3538 |====================================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 5815.8 |==================================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 11592.5 |=================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 4731.48 |=================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 4679.24 |=================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 4713.17 |=================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 4771.84 |=================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 4711.84 |=================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2888.15 |=================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2874.71 |=================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2881.13 |=================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2770.17 |=================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2874.98 |=================================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 26.97 |===================================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 9.284 |===================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0674 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0827 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0822 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0842 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0862 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0909 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.1083 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0291 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0295 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0309 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0312 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0324 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0321 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0366 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0339 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0345 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0445 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0381 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0394 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0496 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0777 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.0821 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.1082 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.1122 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.1140 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.1138 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.1153 |==================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.1286 |==================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 us < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 41.87 |===================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 us < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 41.25 |===================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 us < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 40.13 |===================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 us < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 41.21 |===================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 16.01 |===================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 100.33 |==================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 135375 |==================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1144267 |=================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 191.00 |==================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 200.60 |==================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2339867 |=================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2462533 |=================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 10646 |===================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 29032 |===================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 26961 |===================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 24834 |===================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 100 |======================================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1000 |====================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 3200 |====================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 6400 |====================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 31991 |===================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 31987 |===================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 49816 |===================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1.05 |====================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 49479 |===================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 33951 |===================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 33.6 |====================================================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 67.2 |====================================================== WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test Seconds < Lower Is Better perf-bench Benchmark: Epoll Wait ops/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 8121 |====================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Hash ops/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1263836 |=================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Memcpy 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 16.45 |===================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Memset 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 56.29 |===================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Sched Pipe ops/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 134663 |==================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Lock-Pi ops/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 176 |======================================================= perf-bench Benchmark: Syscall Basic ops/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 3643138 |=================================================== OSBench Test: Create Files us Per Event < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 37.86 |===================================================== OSBench Test: Create Threads us Per Event < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 22.85 |===================================================== OSBench Test: Launch Programs us Per Event < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 254.74 |==================================================== OSBench Test: Create Processes us Per Event < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 45.84 |===================================================== OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 105.45 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 743335 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 834777 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 806141 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 739186 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 635611 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 520761 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 735279 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 699664 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 701939 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 697203 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 611157 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 599960 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 500803 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 494068 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 495408 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 480444 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 453655 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 400503 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 624103 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 613799 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 604010 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 578503 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 537162 |==================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 467828 |==================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 8.120 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 15.36 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 30.00 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 59.33 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 8.457 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 117.53 |==================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 15.10 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 235.13 |==================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 30.12 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 58.20 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 116.77 |==================================================== Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 232.04 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 6956024847 |================================================ OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 7339119477 |================================================ OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 6159.4 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 409181.5 |================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 115410673207 |============================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 120582180503 |============================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 91003690553 |=============================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 61593634767 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 42638 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.023 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 173 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 5.781 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1316669 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.038 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1312654 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.076 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1312434 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.191 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 174 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 287.72 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1261724 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.396 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1233499 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.649 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 37270 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.027 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 174 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 575.89 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1208232 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.828 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 173 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1444.78 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 161 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 3102.16 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 838648 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 5.962 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 147 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 5497.66 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 221 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 4.525 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1210898 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.041 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 30511 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.033 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 133 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 7651.18 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 99 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 51323.88 |================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1185990 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.084 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1148130 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.218 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1435 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 34.84 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1066011 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.469 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1027288 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.779 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 299 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 3.348 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 881609 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.057 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 22650 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.139 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 204 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 4.901 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1233 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 81.09 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1014745 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.986 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1983 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 126.06 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1851 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 276.55 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 680249 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 7.350 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1819 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 447.96 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 793011 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.126 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 717628 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.348 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 697 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 72.11 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 666891 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.750 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 615643 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1.299 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 276 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 3.636 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 668489 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.075 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 119 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 8.411 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2513 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 19.90 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1737 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 587.01 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1689 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2961.13 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 966 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 105.80 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 583930 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1.713 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1298 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 194.65 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1848 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 276.02 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 417739 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 11.97 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2071 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 393.63 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 505296 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.198 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 502014 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 0.498 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 768 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 65.24 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 465373 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1.075 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 436137 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1.835 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 3054 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 32.75 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 3303 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 75.69 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 511 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 97.97 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 3437 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 145.47 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 3432 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 233.10 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2333 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 434.21 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2162 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2325.86 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 893 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 112.84 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 413355 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2.419 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1095 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 229.39 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1693 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 297.69 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 26129 |===================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 278.42 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2088 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 385.53 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 596 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 167.90 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 3387 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 295.24 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 838 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 298.41 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1237 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 409.39 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 3443 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1452.11 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1723 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 465.14 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1923 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 530.20 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2514 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2010.32 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1719 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 582.14 |==================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1671 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 3100.31 |=================================================== SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 95.36 |===================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Shared Mutex Lock Shared ns < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 37.0 |====================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock ns < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 33.5 |====================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 35.1 |====================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 22.6 |====================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Semaphore Release And Acquire ns < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 18.5 |====================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock_amd ns < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 35.4 |====================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock pthread_mutex ns < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 19.3 |====================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock ticket_spinlock ns < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 22.2 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Hash Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 4321865.38 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1466.82 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 38.24 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Pipe Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2702716.62 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Poll Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1989771.53 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Zlib Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1554.59 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Futex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1879.40 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: MEMFD Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Mutex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 421235.54 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 161.11 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 27479.95 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 26560150.11 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Cloning Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 8775.67 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 7667.71 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Pthread Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 89089.67 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: AVL Tree Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 182.40 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: IO_uring Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 525623.73 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 1683073.22 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 45781.04 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 31929174.94 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 124469.94 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 79625.89 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Function Call Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 13806.55 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: x86_64 RdRand Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 500991.76 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 5068.92 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Matrix 3D Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 4378.40 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 6367.20 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Vector Shuffle Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 14915.65 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 18232.07 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Wide Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 921075.93 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 2735965.85 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Fused Multiply-Add Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 20321632.52 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Vector Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 48747.21 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 9558194.24 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 420.76 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.15.10 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 3096853.94 |================================================ ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 705 |======================================================= RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 4 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 38975.16 |================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 40949.53 |================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 129421.33 |================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 149296.68 |================================================= Schbench 2021-09-09 Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 50.0th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 29 |======================================================== Schbench 2021-09-09 Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 75.0th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 60 |======================================================== Schbench 2021-09-09 Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 90.0th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 94 |======================================================== Schbench 2021-09-09 Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better ituietst326-92.1 . 14571 |=====================================================