ddd

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U testing with a LENOVO 21CM0001US (R22ET51W 1.21 BIOS) and AMD Radeon 680M 1GB on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2308017-NE-DDD80191909
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

CPU Massive 2 Tests
Creator Workloads 2 Tests
Database Test Suite 4 Tests
Multi-Core 3 Tests
Server 4 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
a
August 01 2023
  3 Hours, 54 Minutes
b
August 01 2023
  3 Hours, 55 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  3 Hours, 55 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

ddd AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U testing with a LENOVO 21CM0001US (R22ET51W 1.21 BIOS) and AMD Radeon 680M 1GB on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U @ 2.70GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO 21CM0001US (R22ET51W 1.21 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h-19h PCIe Root Complex, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 512GB Micron MTFDKBA512TFK, Graphics: AMD Radeon 680M 1GB (2200/400MHz), Audio: AMD Rembrandt Radeon HD Audio, Network: Qualcomm QCNFA765 OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-23-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.0, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.2 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.49), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 b: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U @ 2.70GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO 21CM0001US (R22ET51W 1.21 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h-19h PCIe Root Complex, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 512GB Micron MTFDKBA512TFK, Graphics: AMD Radeon 680M 1GB (2200/400MHz), Audio: AMD Rembrandt Radeon HD Audio, Network: Qualcomm QCNFA765 OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-23-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.0, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.2 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.49), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 15.99 |==================================================================== b . 15.83 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 26.49 |==================================================================== b . 25.75 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 13.22 |=============================================================== b . 14.26 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 24.83 |================================================================== b . 25.42 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 10.73 |==================================================================== b . 10.74 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 28.96 |================================================================== b . 29.85 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 55.92 |================================================================== b . 57.80 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 149.82 |=================================================================== b . 149.15 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 59.81 |==================================================================== b . 58.87 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 183.35 |=============================================================== b . 194.35 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 74.71 |============================================================ b . 85.18 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 349.20 |=================================================================== b . 348.64 |=================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2.785 |==================================================================== b . 2.794 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 5.859 |=================================================================== b . 5.918 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 8.975 |==================================================================== b . 8.948 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 19.56 |==================================================================== b . 19.55 |==================================================================== Crypto++ 8.8 Test: All Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better a . 1991.74 |================================================================== b . 1959.35 |================================================================= Crypto++ 8.8 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better a . 751.55 |=================================================================== b . 743.59 |================================================================== Crypto++ 8.8 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better a . 481.39 |=================================================================== b . 469.69 |================================================================= Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 378600.22 |============================================ b . 548284.03 |================================================================ Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 659435.45 |================================================================ b . 640482.76 |============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 701618.43 |================================================================ b . 699387.24 |================================================================ Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 697983.46 |================================================================ b . 696927.85 |================================================================ Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 554947.35 |================================================================ b . 533769.62 |============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 655194.95 |================================================================ b . 640674.75 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 689900.01 |================================================================ b . 692893.58 |================================================================ Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 692928.52 |=============================================================== b . 699267.35 |================================================================ Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 516912.21 |=========================================================== b . 559548.66 |================================================================ Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 652304.58 |================================================================ b . 641616.96 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 689982.27 |================================================================ b . 693249.61 |================================================================ Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 693538.48 |================================================================ b . 691404.90 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 355162.39 |================================================================ b . 349996.03 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 350738.34 |================================================================ b . 346031.14 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 351292.26 |================================================================ b . 352530.18 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 358834.90 |================================================================ b . 342207.95 |============================================================= Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 351690.22 |================================================================ b . 348905.59 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 349134.54 |============================================================== b . 359429.29 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 656527.51 |=============================================================== b . 665472.49 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1220741.57 |============================================================== b . 1245883.44 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 979943.79 |================================================================ b . 931755.78 |============================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1548435.84 |=============================================================== b . 1530455.31 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1421230.05 |============================================================== b . 1443578.10 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1537580.41 |=============================================================== b . 1500961.11 |============================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 27696092.81 |============================================================== b . 26915349.11 |============================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 29520178.47 |============================================================== b . 29718403.60 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 29445321.84 |============================================================= b . 29746965.10 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 25720901.02 |============================================================== b . 24238837.68 |========================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 24793670.54 |============================================================== b . 21797877.65 |======================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 13553125.69 |============================================================== b . 13577694.64 |============================================================== BRL-CAD 7.36 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better a . 104416 |=================================================================== b . 104737 |=================================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1664.98 |================================================================== b . 1672.58 |==================================================================