ddd AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U testing with a LENOVO 21CM0001US (R22ET51W 1.21 BIOS) and AMD Radeon 680M 1GB on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U @ 2.70GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO 21CM0001US (R22ET51W 1.21 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h-19h PCIe Root Complex, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 512GB Micron MTFDKBA512TFK, Graphics: AMD Radeon 680M 1GB (2200/400MHz), Audio: AMD Rembrandt Radeon HD Audio, Network: Qualcomm QCNFA765 OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-23-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.0, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.2 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.49), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 b: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U @ 2.70GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO 21CM0001US (R22ET51W 1.21 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h-19h PCIe Root Complex, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 512GB Micron MTFDKBA512TFK, Graphics: AMD Radeon 680M 1GB (2200/400MHz), Audio: AMD Rembrandt Radeon HD Audio, Network: Qualcomm QCNFA765 OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-23-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.0, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.2 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.49), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Crypto++ 8.8 Test: All Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better a . 1991.74 |================================================================== b . 1959.35 |================================================================= Crypto++ 8.8 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better a . 751.55 |=================================================================== b . 743.59 |================================================================== Crypto++ 8.8 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better a . 481.39 |=================================================================== b . 469.69 |================================================================= VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2.785 |==================================================================== b . 2.794 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 5.859 |=================================================================== b . 5.918 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 8.975 |==================================================================== b . 8.948 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 19.56 |==================================================================== b . 19.55 |==================================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1664.98 |================================================================== b . 1672.58 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 656527.51 |=============================================================== b . 665472.49 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 15.99 |==================================================================== b . 15.83 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1220741.57 |============================================================== b . 1245883.44 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 26.49 |==================================================================== b . 25.75 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 979943.79 |================================================================ b . 931755.78 |============================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 13.22 |=============================================================== b . 14.26 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1548435.84 |=============================================================== b . 1530455.31 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 24.83 |================================================================== b . 25.42 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1421230.05 |============================================================== b . 1443578.10 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 10.73 |==================================================================== b . 10.74 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1537580.41 |=============================================================== b . 1500961.11 |============================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 28.96 |================================================================== b . 29.85 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 27696092.81 |============================================================== b . 26915349.11 |============================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 55.92 |================================================================== b . 57.80 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 29520178.47 |============================================================== b . 29718403.60 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 149.82 |=================================================================== b . 149.15 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 29445321.84 |============================================================= b . 29746965.10 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 59.81 |==================================================================== b . 58.87 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 25720901.02 |============================================================== b . 24238837.68 |========================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 183.35 |=============================================================== b . 194.35 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 24793670.54 |============================================================== b . 21797877.65 |======================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 74.71 |============================================================ b . 85.18 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 13553125.69 |============================================================== b . 13577694.64 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 349.20 |=================================================================== b . 348.64 |=================================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 378600.22 |============================================ b . 548284.03 |================================================================ Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 659435.45 |================================================================ b . 640482.76 |============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 701618.43 |================================================================ b . 699387.24 |================================================================ Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 697983.46 |================================================================ b . 696927.85 |================================================================ Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 554947.35 |================================================================ b . 533769.62 |============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 655194.95 |================================================================ b . 640674.75 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 689900.01 |================================================================ b . 692893.58 |================================================================ Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 692928.52 |=============================================================== b . 699267.35 |================================================================ Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 516912.21 |=========================================================== b . 559548.66 |================================================================ Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 652304.58 |================================================================ b . 641616.96 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 689982.27 |================================================================ b . 693249.61 |================================================================ Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 693538.48 |================================================================ b . 691404.90 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 355162.39 |================================================================ b . 349996.03 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 350738.34 |================================================================ b . 346031.14 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 351292.26 |================================================================ b . 352530.18 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 358834.90 |================================================================ b . 342207.95 |============================================================= Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 351690.22 |================================================================ b . 348905.59 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 349134.54 |============================================================== b . 359429.29 |================================================================ Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better BRL-CAD 7.36 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better a . 104416 |=================================================================== b . 104737 |===================================================================