Microsoft Azure HBv4 HPC Performance Benchmarks

Benchmarks for a future article on Phoronix looking at HBv4 Genoa-X Linux performance..

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2308011-PTS-AZUREHBV71
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

C/C++ Compiler Tests 2 Tests
CPU Massive 7 Tests
Creator Workloads 4 Tests
Fortran Tests 4 Tests
Game Development 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 6 Tests
Molecular Dynamics 2 Tests
MPI Benchmarks 3 Tests
Multi-Core 12 Tests
Intel oneAPI 3 Tests
OpenMPI Tests 5 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 2 Tests
Python Tests 2 Tests
Renderers 2 Tests
Scientific Computing 3 Tests
Server CPU Tests 5 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
HC
July 27 2023
  5 Hours, 11 Minutes
HBv2
July 27 2023
  7 Hours, 22 Minutes
HBv3
July 27 2023
  6 Hours, 40 Minutes
HBv4
July 26 2023
  6 Hours, 44 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  6 Hours, 29 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Microsoft Azure HBv4 HPC Performance Benchmarks Benchmarks for a future article on Phoronix looking at HBv4 Genoa-X Linux performance.. HBv4: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 9V33X 96-Core (176 Cores), Motherboard: Microsoft Virtual Machine (Hyper-V UEFI v4.1 BIOS), Memory: 1 GB + 59 GB + 116 GB + 176 GB + 176 GB + 176 GB, Disk: 2 x 1920GB Microsoft NVMe Direct Disk + 32GB Virtual Disk + 515GB Virtual Disk, Graphics: hyperv_fb OS: AlmaLinux 8.8, Kernel: 4.18.0-425.3.1.el8.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.1.0 + CUDA 12.1, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: microsoft HBv3: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7V73X 64-Core (120 Cores), Motherboard: Microsoft Virtual Machine (Hyper-V UEFI v4.1 BIOS), Memory: 1 GB + 59 GB + 54 GB + 114 GB + 114 GB + 114 GB, Disk: 2 x 960GB Microsoft NVMe Direct Disk + 32GB Virtual Disk + 515GB Virtual Disk, Graphics: hyperv_fb OS: AlmaLinux 8.8, Kernel: 4.18.0-425.3.1.el8.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.1.0 + CUDA 12.1, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: microsoft HBv2: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7V12 64-Core (120 Cores), Motherboard: Microsoft Virtual Machine (Hyper-V UEFI v4.1 BIOS), Memory: 1 GB + 59 GB + 54 GB + 114 GB + 114 GB + 114 GB, Disk: 960GB Microsoft NVMe Direct Disk + 32GB Virtual Disk + 515GB Virtual Disk, Graphics: hyperv_fb OS: AlmaLinux 8.8, Kernel: 4.18.0-425.3.1.el8.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.1.0 + CUDA 12.1, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: microsoft HC: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 (44 Cores), Motherboard: Microsoft Virtual Machine (Hyper-V UEFI v4.1 BIOS), Memory: 1 GB + 60928 MB + 118272 MB + 176 GB, Disk: 32GB Virtual Disk + 752GB Virtual Disk, Graphics: hyperv_fb OS: AlmaLinux 8.8, Kernel: 4.18.0-425.3.1.el8.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.1.0 + CUDA 12.1, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: microsoft 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 1083523 |=============================================================== HBv3 . 566595 |================================= HBv2 . 501534 |============================= HC ... 216451 |============= 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 742859 |================================================================ HBv3 . 406516 |=================================== HBv2 . 388577 |================================= HC ... 150841 |============= ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 52.802440 |============================================================= HBv3 . 25.048352 |============================= HBv2 . 6.395415 |======= HC ... 14.072027 |================ Blender 3.6 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better HBv4 . 10.11 |============= HBv3 . 19.43 |========================= HBv2 . 19.58 |========================= HC ... 49.95 |================================================================= Blender 3.6 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better HBv4 . 25.61 |============ HBv3 . 50.71 |======================= HBv2 . 50.95 |======================== HC ... 138.51 |================================================================ Blender 3.6 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better HBv4 . 13.74 |============ HBv3 . 25.59 |======================= HBv2 . 26.43 |======================== HC ... 71.76 |================================================================= Blender 3.6 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better HBv4 . 97.52 |============ HBv3 . 188.96 |======================= HBv2 . 211.46 |========================== HC ... 526.93 |================================================================ Blender 3.6 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better HBv4 . 33.01 |============ HBv3 . 62.90 |======================= HBv2 . 64.84 |======================== HC ... 175.07 |================================================================ HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 256.35 |================================================================ HBv3 . 103.51 |========================== HBv2 . 91.54 |======================= HC ... 58.36 |=============== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 355.86 |================================================================ HBv3 . 135.69 |======================== HBv2 . 95.88 |================= HC ... 62.98 |=========== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 622.58 |================================================================ HBv3 . 254.25 |========================== HBv2 . 191.78 |==================== HC ... 114.03 |============ HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 159.18 |================================================================ HBv3 . 57.33 |======================= HBv2 . 47.61 |=================== HC ... 33.52 |============= HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 244.34 |================================================================ HBv3 . 103.41 |=========================== HBv2 . 91.26 |======================== HC ... 59.73 |================ HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 323.36 |================================================================ HBv3 . 123.24 |======================== HBv2 . 93.79 |=================== HC ... 57.76 |=========== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 261.90 |================================================================ HBv3 . 103.25 |========================= HBv2 . 91.92 |====================== HC ... 57.31 |============== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 314.34 |================================================================ HBv3 . 121.28 |========================= HBv2 . 91.48 |=================== HC ... 60.88 |============ HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 596.23 |================================================================ HBv3 . 232.17 |========================= HBv2 . 190.95 |==================== HC ... 110.05 |============ HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 154.65 |================================================================ HBv3 . 56.22 |======================= HBv2 . 46.98 |=================== HC ... 31.57 |============= HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 264.95 |================================================================ HBv3 . 102.70 |========================= HBv2 . 93.31 |======================= HC ... 60.57 |=============== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 311.80 |================================================================ HBv3 . 117.73 |======================== HBv2 . 94.53 |=================== HC ... 59.82 |============ HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 255.97 |================================================================ HBv3 . 105.09 |========================== HBv2 . 90.79 |======================= HC ... 58.55 |=============== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 355.51 |================================================================ HBv3 . 135.95 |======================== HBv2 . 96.49 |================= HC ... 62.90 |=========== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 427.10 |================================================================ HBv3 . 221.86 |================================= HBv2 . 200.04 |============================== HC ... 122.77 |================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 624.95 |================================================================ HBv3 . 257.42 |========================== HBv2 . 191.14 |==================== HC ... 113.94 |============ HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 159.26 |================================================================ HBv3 . 57.23 |======================= HBv2 . 47.37 |=================== HC ... 33.55 |============= HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 247.73 |================================================================ HBv3 . 105.36 |=========================== HBv2 . 92.13 |======================== HC ... 59.55 |=============== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 323.70 |================================================================ HBv3 . 124.60 |========================= HBv2 . 93.26 |================== HC ... 57.92 |=========== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 273.12 |================================================================ HBv3 . 106.63 |========================= HBv2 . 88.61 |===================== HC ... 57.13 |============= HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 315.98 |================================================================ HBv3 . 120.96 |======================== HBv2 . 91.43 |=================== HC ... 60.82 |============ HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float-long - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 590.93 |================================================================ HBv3 . 233.80 |========================= HBv2 . 189.21 |==================== HC ... 110.20 |============ HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 154.57 |================================================================ HBv3 . 56.27 |======================= HBv2 . 46.93 |=================== HC ... 31.58 |============= HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 256 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 258.72 |================================================================ HBv3 . 105.50 |========================== HBv2 . 92.39 |======================= HC ... 60.89 |=============== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double-long - X Y Z: 512 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 311.27 |================================================================ HBv3 . 118.24 |======================== HBv2 . 95.20 |==================== HC ... 59.90 |============ High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 104 104 104 - RT: 60 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 89.38 |================================================================= HBv3 . 39.61 |============================= HBv2 . 37.04 |=========================== HC ... 26.00 |=================== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 144 144 144 - RT: 60 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 88.52 |================================================================= HBv3 . 38.97 |============================= HBv2 . 36.09 |=========================== HC ... 25.87 |=================== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 160 160 160 - RT: 60 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 87.90 |================================================================= HBv3 . 39.11 |============================= HBv2 . 36.02 |=========================== HC ... 25.56 |=================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 3.11 |================================================================== HBv3 . 1.72 |===================================== HBv2 . 2.03 |=========================================== HC ... 1.85 |======================================= Intel Open Image Denoise 2.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 3.08 |================================================================== HBv3 . 1.69 |==================================== HBv2 . 2.01 |=========================================== HC ... 1.85 |======================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 1.32 |================================================================== HBv3 . 0.80 |======================================== HBv2 . 0.96 |================================================ HC ... 0.87 |============================================ Laghos 3.1 Test: Triple Point Problem Major Kernels Total Rate > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 228.15 |================================================================ HBv3 . 192.74 |====================================================== HBv2 . 183.82 |==================================================== HC ... 156.52 |============================================ Laghos 3.1 Test: Sedov Blast Wave, ube_922_hex.mesh Major Kernels Total Rate > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 402.94 |================================================================ HBv3 . 361.81 |========================================================= HBv2 . 345.14 |======================================================= HC ... 247.49 |======================================= libxsmm 2-1.17-3645 M N K: 128 GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 6655.2 |================================================================ HBv3 . 2273.5 |====================== HBv2 . 1011.4 |========== HC ... 1284.8 |============ libxsmm 2-1.17-3645 M N K: 256 GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 6908.6 |================================================================ HBv3 . 2045.7 |=================== HBv2 . 1128.3 |========== HC ... 904.1 |======== libxsmm 2-1.17-3645 M N K: 32 GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 6163.0 |================================================================ HBv3 . 1438.1 |=============== HBv2 . 164.8 |== HC ... 384.9 |==== libxsmm 2-1.17-3645 M N K: 64 GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 5898.2 |================================================================ HBv3 . 2413.7 |========================== HBv2 . 331.4 |==== HC ... 748.1 |======== Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 5412900000 |============================================================ HBv3 . 4216966667 |=============================================== HBv2 . 4309133333 |================================================ HC ... 1570633333 |================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 176 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 6181766667 |============================================================ HBv3 . 3864000000 |====================================== HBv2 . 4275533333 |========================================= HC ... 1536633333 |=============== Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 176 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 7095033333 |============================================================ HBv3 . 4281533333 |==================================== HBv2 . 4350100000 |===================================== HC ... 1683033333 |============== Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 176 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 2221966667 |============================================================ HBv3 . 814950000 |====================== HBv2 . 924243333 |========================= HC ... 544626667 |=============== NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better HBv4 . 0.14380 |================= HBv3 . 0.27111 |================================ HBv2 . 0.26505 |================================ HC ... 0.52697 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 744413.90 |============================================================= HBv3 . 313813.98 |========================== HBv2 . 241509.88 |==================== HC ... 106230.52 |========= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 74101.94 |============================================================== HBv3 . 36681.43 |=============================== HBv2 . 36367.35 |============================== HC ... 27619.05 |======================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 230164.79 |============================================================= HBv3 . 102122.36 |=========================== HBv2 . 98485.23 |========================== HC ... 55288.19 |=============== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 12967.37 |============================================================== HBv3 . 5730.01 |=========================== HBv2 . 3977.02 |=================== HC ... 1864.68 |========= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 437417.16 |============================================================= HBv3 . 131635.41 |================== HBv2 . 108985.72 |=============== HC ... 63404.01 |========= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 427298.99 |============================================================= HBv3 . 205795.59 |============================= HBv2 . 104771.90 |=============== HC ... 41543.94 |====== oneDNN 3.1 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better HBv4 . 533.49 |========================= HBv3 . 886.81 |========================================= HBv2 . 1367.73 |=============================================================== HC ... 707.32 |================================= oneDNN 3.1 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better HBv4 . 411.23 |============================= HBv3 . 529.97 |===================================== HBv2 . 910.94 |================================================================ HC ... 442.47 |=============================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 36.65480 |============================================================== HBv3 . 24.47100 |========================================= HBv2 . 22.36680 |====================================== HC ... 8.99618 |=============== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 36.54460 |============================================================== HBv3 . 24.21970 |========================================= HBv2 . 22.17470 |====================================== HC ... 8.87831 |=============== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 208.05 |================================================================ HBv3 . 167.50 |==================================================== HBv2 . 162.45 |================================================== HC ... 96.76 |============================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 38.07690 |============================================================== HBv3 . 11.75010 |=================== HBv2 . 8.66888 |============== HC ... 9.52293 |================ OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 37.06240 |============================================================== HBv3 . 11.17230 |=================== HBv2 . 8.32323 |============== HC ... 9.02689 |=============== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 32.58 |================================================================= HBv3 . 14.61 |============================= HBv2 . 13.94 |============================ HC ... 10.06 |==================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better HBv4 . 3.581391 |========= HBv3 . 6.277107 |=============== HBv2 . 5.915805 |============== HC ... 25.019560 |============================================================= Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better HBv4 . 2.122074 |============ HBv3 . 3.649317 |===================== HBv2 . 3.466885 |==================== HC ... 10.645480 |============================================================= PETSc 3.19 Test: Streams MB/s > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 598417.70 |============================================================= HBv3 . 284001.92 |============================= HBv2 . 197895.47 |==================== HC ... 151286.25 |=============== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 3161848 |=============================================================== HBv3 . 2434749 |================================================= HBv2 . 2467328 |================================================= HC ... 1353510 |=========================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better HBv4 . 0.158 |============================ HBv3 . 0.206 |==================================== HBv2 . 0.203 |==================================== HC ... 0.369 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better HBv4 . 3146173 |=============================================================== HBv3 . 2478917 |================================================== HBv2 . 2481320 |================================================== HC ... 1159492 |======================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better HBv4 . 0.254 |======================== HBv3 . 0.323 |============================== HBv2 . 0.323 |============================== HC ... 0.690 |================================================================= Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better HBv4 . 150.56 |============================= HBv3 . 185.57 |==================================== HBv2 . 194.37 |====================================== HC ... 330.61 |================================================================