saturday tests Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H testing with a Quanta Cloud S6Q-MB-MPS (3A10.uh BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H @ 3.50GHz (60 Cores / 120 Threads), Motherboard: Quanta Cloud S6Q-MB-MPS (3A10.uh BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 1bce, Memory: 512GB, Disk: 3 x 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VGA HDMI, Network: 4 x Intel E810-C for QSFP OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-47-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.4, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200 b: Processor: Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H @ 3.50GHz (60 Cores / 120 Threads), Motherboard: Quanta Cloud S6Q-MB-MPS (3A10.uh BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 1bce, Memory: 512GB, Disk: 3 x 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VGA HDMI, Network: 4 x Intel E810-C for QSFP OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-47-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.4, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200 c: Processor: Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H @ 3.50GHz (60 Cores / 120 Threads), Motherboard: Quanta Cloud S6Q-MB-MPS (3A10.uh BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 1bce, Memory: 512GB, Disk: 3 x 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VGA HDMI, Network: 4 x Intel E810-C for QSFP OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-47-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.4, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200 d: Processor: Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H @ 3.50GHz (60 Cores / 120 Threads), Motherboard: Quanta Cloud S6Q-MB-MPS (3A10.uh BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 1bce, Memory: 512GB, Disk: 3 x 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VGA HDMI, Network: 4 x Intel E810-C for QSFP OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-47-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.4, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200 e: Processor: Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H @ 3.50GHz (60 Cores / 120 Threads), Motherboard: Quanta Cloud S6Q-MB-MPS (3A10.uh BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 1bce, Memory: 512GB, Disk: 3 x 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VGA HDMI, Network: 4 x Intel E810-C for QSFP OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-47-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.4, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200 VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 6.614 |==================================================================== b . 6.575 |==================================================================== c . 6.620 |==================================================================== d . 6.578 |==================================================================== e . 6.590 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 11.75 |==================================================================== b . 11.61 |=================================================================== c . 11.75 |==================================================================== d . 11.66 |=================================================================== e . 11.64 |=================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 17.70 |==================================================================== b . 17.73 |==================================================================== c . 17.73 |==================================================================== d . 17.67 |==================================================================== e . 17.70 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 33.21 |==================================================================== b . 33.06 |==================================================================== c . 33.00 |==================================================================== d . 33.24 |==================================================================== e . 33.21 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 715721.38 |================================================================ b . 720505.11 |================================================================ c . 664694.12 |=========================================================== d . 697470.37 |============================================================== e . 695464.45 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 14.33 |=========================================================== b . 14.13 |========================================================== c . 16.44 |==================================================================== d . 15.06 |============================================================== e . 15.14 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1199796.30 |=============================================================== b . 1185790.62 |============================================================== c . 1208557.13 |=============================================================== d . 1190473.73 |============================================================== e . 1159046.57 |============================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 27.79 |================================================================ b . 28.34 |================================================================== c . 27.65 |================================================================ d . 28.19 |================================================================= e . 29.33 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1038260.89 |=============================================================== b . 1013859.07 |============================================================= c . 1039895.73 |=============================================================== d . 1035120.93 |=============================================================== e . 1005509.58 |============================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 12.34 |================================================================ b . 12.66 |================================================================== c . 12.27 |================================================================ d . 12.46 |================================================================= e . 13.03 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1490344.13 |============================================================ b . 1556894.35 |=============================================================== c . 1555878.89 |=============================================================== d . 1467561.15 |=========================================================== e . 1477426.81 |============================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 26.31 |=================================================================== b . 25.11 |================================================================ c . 25.18 |================================================================ d . 26.70 |==================================================================== e . 26.58 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1539515.02 |============================================================= b . 1491451.21 |=========================================================== c . 1567281.81 |============================================================== d . 1557632.50 |============================================================== e . 1587027.95 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 9.98 |================================================================= b . 10.43 |==================================================================== c . 9.70 |=============================================================== d . 9.90 |================================================================= e . 9.62 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1846847.97 |=============================================================== b . 1796280.10 |============================================================= c . 1746779.07 |============================================================ d . 1824131.64 |============================================================== e . 1833954.14 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 23.44 |================================================================ b . 24.21 |================================================================== c . 24.77 |==================================================================== d . 24.52 |=================================================================== e . 23.43 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 44029940.47 |============================================================== b . 41827037.76 |=========================================================== c . 41804225.21 |=========================================================== d . 42472240.20 |============================================================ e . 43919658.12 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 30.43 |=============================================================== b . 32.82 |==================================================================== c . 32.98 |==================================================================== d . 32.32 |=================================================================== e . 30.37 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 58548068.32 |============================================================== b . 57701275.14 |============================================================= c . 56345174.60 |=========================================================== d . 56879699.23 |============================================================ e . 59001582.44 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 69.11 |================================================================= b . 69.60 |================================================================== c . 71.77 |==================================================================== d . 71.45 |==================================================================== e . 68.37 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 49905195.45 |========================================================= b . 50621358.78 |========================================================== c . 52668332.17 |============================================================ d . 54494930.36 |============================================================== e . 51193867.57 |========================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 32.15 |==================================================================== b . 31.81 |=================================================================== c . 30.20 |================================================================ d . 28.84 |============================================================= e . 31.07 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 45735769.73 |============================================================ b . 47057812.32 |============================================================= c . 45598175.96 |=========================================================== d . 47568781.22 |============================================================== e . 45850230.21 |============================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 100.38 |================================================================== b . 97.80 |================================================================= c . 101.20 |=================================================================== d . 96.75 |================================================================ e . 100.69 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 58377184.20 |============================================================= b . 58329429.59 |============================================================= c . 58549553.34 |============================================================== d . 57961789.83 |============================================================= e . 58887920.53 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 30.47 |=================================================================== b . 30.72 |==================================================================== c . 30.30 |=================================================================== d . 30.62 |==================================================================== e . 29.56 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 66850559.54 |========================================================== b . 70785966.90 |============================================================== c . 71337117.11 |============================================================== d . 70431920.31 |============================================================= e . 71168101.89 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 68.39 |==================================================================== b . 64.59 |================================================================ c . 65.99 |================================================================== d . 65.01 |================================================================= e . 64.19 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5098.95 |================================================================== b . 4401.34 |========================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 16 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 90239.67 |================================================================= b . 76429.60 |======================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 150363.85 |================================================================ b . 137073.55 |========================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 0 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 99408.49 |================================================================= b . 47037.68 |=============================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5024.84 |================================================================ b . 5170.27 |================================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 0 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 95185.64 |================================================================= b . 70503.51 |================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 4402.00 |============================================== b . 6286.35 |================================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 128 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 142167.00 |================================================================ b . 131096.93 |=========================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 0 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 180012.39 |================================================================ b . 67679.79 |======================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 4828.03 |================================================================== b . 3315.19 |============================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better b . 83173.91 |============================================================ a . 90622.20 |================================================================= b . 84733.02 |============================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 78122.58 |================================================================= b . 5219.23 |==== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better b . 54504.17 |================================ a . 107788.90 |================================================================ b . 72320.61 |=========================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 22336.57 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 16 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 56947.62 |================================================================= b . 53997.48 |============================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 16 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 64277.27 |================================================================= b . 26304.66 |=========================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better b . 66474.67 |================================================================= a . 28129.33 |============================ b . 62370.75 |============================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 101768.61 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 16 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 36541.35 |====================================================== b . 44146.93 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 16 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 57890.95 |=========================================== b . 87617.74 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 32 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better b . 89613.46 |================================================================= a . 85674.71 |============================================================== b . 59711.04 |=========================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 123182.82 |================================================================ b . 113153.33 |=========================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 73949.80 |========================================================= b . 84392.80 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better b . 42821.33 |================================= a . 84007.30 |================================================================= b . 67377.48 |==================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 127160.44 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 128 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better b . 60200.79 |=========================================================== a . 57860.87 |========================================================= b . 66495.50 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 128 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 141662.86 |================================================================ b . 48586.60 |====================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5013.32 |============================================================== b . 5325.86 |================================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 0 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5353.68 |================================================================= b . 5477.22 |================================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 16 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 93300.81 |================================================================= b . 80739.66 |======================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 149555.22 |================================================================ b . 139575.97 |============================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 0 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 327116.60 |================================================================ b . 140248.04 |=========================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5160.23 |================================================ b . 7143.45 |================================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 0 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 335636.63 |================================================================ b . 129333.45 |========================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5094.91 |================================================================== b . 4649.02 |============================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 16 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 78344.72 |============================================================== b . 81592.22 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 132290.49 |============================================================= b . 137829.74 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 0 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 394202.40 |================================================================ b . 364242.68 |=========================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 6070.58 |============================================================ b . 6684.57 |================================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 0 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 394530.94 |================================================================ b . 372310.94 |============================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5218.71 |======================================================= b . 6239.94 |================================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 128 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 133370.05 |=============================================================== b . 134729.55 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 0 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 344915.87 |================================================================ b . 130855.63 |======================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5440.76 |================================================== b . 7155.91 |================================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 79456.26 |================================================================= b . 52689.91 |=========================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 100412.84 |========================================================== b . 111668.70 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 184390.79 |================================================================ b . 122463.56 |=========================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 16 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 82503.57 |================================================================= b . 78296.02 |============================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 124605.23 |================================================================ b . 124991.19 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 0 - Num Threads Read: 128 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 141554.46 |================================================================ b . 131053.98 |=========================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 0 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 395043.08 |================================================================ b . 366803.45 |=========================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 1 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 6970.65 |================================================================== YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 16 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 72733.50 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 105670.00 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 81809.89 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 16 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 84460.30 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 107047.93 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 16 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 105001.13 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 177611.14 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 209482.93 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 111736.40 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 184819.37 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 61297.14 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 16 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 71805.58 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 159167.46 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 218950.32 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 87839.62 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 221431.19 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 53639.89 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 10 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 128 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 192721.01 |================================================================ YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 128 - Num Threads Read: 128 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 186190.79 |================================================================