smoke core
Intel Core i9-13900K testing with a ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI (0812 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


a: 

	Processor: Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.50GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI (0812 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7a27, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 2000GB + 2 x 64GB Flash Drive, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB (2575/1000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS VP28U

	OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-50-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.2.5-0ubuntu0.1~22.04.3 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.47), Vulkan: 1.3.224, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160


IOR 3.3.0
Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 1545.05 |==================================================================


IOR 3.3.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 30.0  AVG: 41.3  MAX: 61.0 


IOR 3.3.0
Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 1646.04 |==================================================================


IOR 3.3.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 30.0  AVG: 46.5  MAX: 70.0 


iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 128
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 256
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 128
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 256
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - 10000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - 10000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - 10000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 128
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


iPerf 3.14
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - 10000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 256
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32
Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 313.90 |===================================================================
a . 312.44 |===================================================================


Ethr 1.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 28.0  AVG: 55.6  MAX: 68.0 


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64
Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 291.70 |===================================================================
a . 289.49 |==================================================================


Ethr 1.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 33.0  AVG: 55.2  MAX: 68.0 


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 128
Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 141.31 |===================================================================
a . 140.17 |==================================================================


Ethr 1.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 33.0  AVG: 53.7  MAX: 70.0 


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 256
Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 263.37 |===================================================================
a . 263.19 |===================================================================


Ethr 1.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 32.0  AVG: 57.6  MAX: 68.0 


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32
Connections/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 508 |======================================================================
a . 507 |======================================================================


Ethr 1.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 33.0  AVG: 39.3  MAX: 43.0 


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64
Connections/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 507 |======================================================================


Ethr 1.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 30.0  AVG: 37.4  MAX: 42.0 


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 128
Connections/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 505 |======================================================================
a . 508 |======================================================================


Ethr 1.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 30.0  AVG: 36.6  MAX: 45.0 


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 256
Connections/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 508 |======================================================================


Ethr 1.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 31.0  AVG: 36.9  MAX: 45.0 


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32
us < Lower Is Better
a . 12.13 |===============================================================
a . 13.18 |====================================================================


Ethr 1.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 30.0  AVG: 30.2  MAX: 31.0 


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64
us < Lower Is Better
a . 13.92 |====================================================================
a . 11.91 |==========================================================


Ethr 1.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 28.0  AVG: 29.6  MAX: 30.0 


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 128
us < Lower Is Better
a . 13.56 |====================================================================
a . 12.85 |================================================================


Ethr 1.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 28.0  AVG: 29.6  MAX: 31.0 


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 256
us < Lower Is Better
a . 13.69 |====================================================================
a . 12.30 |=============================================================


Ethr 1.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 28.0  AVG: 29.8  MAX: 31.0 


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32
Packets/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 11197200 |=================================================================
a . 10899600 |===============================================================


Ethr 1.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 28.0  AVG: 57.0  MAX: 76.0 


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64
Packets/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 11636800 |================================================================
a . 11770000 |=================================================================


Ethr 1.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 32.0  AVG: 56.7  MAX: 74.0 


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 128
Packets/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 6292955 |==================================================================
a . 6287097 |==================================================================


Ethr 1.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 33.0  AVG: 53.8  MAX: 76.0 


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 256
Packets/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 12489200 |=================================================================
a . 12410800 |=================================================================


Ethr 1.0
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 33.0  AVG: 56.9  MAX: 75.0 


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 128
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 256
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 128
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 256
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 128
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 256
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 128
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 256
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 128
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Ethr 1.0
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 256
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better


Sockperf 3.7
Test: Latency Under Load
usec < Lower Is Better
a . 23.80 |====================================================================
a . 23.35 |===================================================================


Sockperf 3.7
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 28.0  AVG: 29.4  MAX: 30.0 


Sockperf 3.7
Test: Latency Ping Pong
usec < Lower Is Better
a . 1.824 |===================================================================
a . 1.847 |====================================================================


Sockperf 3.7
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 28.0  AVG: 29.4  MAX: 30.0 


Sockperf 3.7
Test: Throughput
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 1430162 |=================================================================
a . 1447903 |==================================================================


Sockperf 3.7
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 28.0  AVG: 29.2  MAX: 33.0 


WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test

Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 93.83 |====================================================================


WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 28.0  AVG: 53.5  MAX: 70.0 


srsRAN Project 23.5
Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Total
Mb/s > Higher Is Better


srsRAN Project 23.5
Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Thread
Mb/s > Higher Is Better


srsRAN Project 23.5
Test: Downlink Processor Benchmark
Mb/s > Higher Is Better


Liquid-DSP 1.6
Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32
samples/s > Higher Is Better


Liquid-DSP 1.6
Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57
samples/s > Higher Is Better


Liquid-DSP 1.6
Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512
samples/s > Higher Is Better


Liquid-DSP 1.6
Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32
samples/s > Higher Is Better


Liquid-DSP 1.6
Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57
samples/s > Higher Is Better


Liquid-DSP 1.6
Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512
samples/s > Higher Is Better


Liquid-DSP 1.6
Threads: 32 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32
samples/s > Higher Is Better


Liquid-DSP 1.6
Threads: 32 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57
samples/s > Higher Is Better


Liquid-DSP 1.6
Threads: 32 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512
samples/s > Higher Is Better


Liquid-DSP 1.6
Threads: 64 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32
samples/s > Higher Is Better


Liquid-DSP 1.6
Threads: 64 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57
samples/s > Higher Is Better


Liquid-DSP 1.6
Threads: 64 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512
samples/s > Higher Is Better


Liquid-DSP 1.6
Threads: 112 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32
samples/s > Higher Is Better


Liquid-DSP 1.6
Threads: 112 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57
samples/s > Higher Is Better


Liquid-DSP 1.6
Threads: 112 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512
samples/s > Higher Is Better


GNU Radio
Test: Five Back to Back FIR Filters
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 2174.2 |===================================================================
a . 2004.6 |==============================================================


GNU Radio
Test: Signal Source (Cosine)
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 5716.3 |===================================================================
a . 5743.3 |===================================================================


GNU Radio
Test: FIR Filter
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 1477.9 |===================================================================
a . 1476.6 |===================================================================


GNU Radio
Test: IIR Filter
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 646.7 |====================================================================
a . 649.1 |====================================================================


GNU Radio
Test: FM Deemphasis Filter
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 1195.0 |===================================================================
a . 1195.7 |===================================================================


GNU Radio
Test: Hilbert Transform
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 1193.6 |===================================================================
a . 1144.4 |================================================================


GNU Radio
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 28.0  AVG: 37.1  MAX: 52.0 


LuaRadio 0.9.1
Test: Five Back to Back FIR Filters
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 1906.7 |===================================================================
a . 1804.8 |===============================================================


LuaRadio 0.9.1
Test: FM Deemphasis Filter
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 747.7 |====================================================================
a . 746.6 |====================================================================


LuaRadio 0.9.1
Test: Hilbert Transform
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 257 |======================================================================


LuaRadio 0.9.1
Test: Complex Phase
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 971.5 |====================================================================
a . 968.1 |====================================================================


LuaRadio 0.9.1
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 30.0  AVG: 37.7  MAX: 50.0 


OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: RSA4096
sign/s > Higher Is Better
a . 5219.5 |===================================================================
a . 5143.6 |==================================================================


OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: RSA4096
verify/s > Higher Is Better
a . 343891.7 |=================================================================
a . 339062.2 |================================================================


OpenSSL 3.1
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 31.0  AVG: 58.6  MAX: 66.0 


OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: SHA256
byte/s > Higher Is Better
a . 33675271650 |==============================================================
a . 33425969730 |==============================================================


OpenSSL 3.1
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 35.0  AVG: 69.9  MAX: 76.0 


OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: SHA512
byte/s > Higher Is Better
a . 10981746010 |==============================================================
a . 10905112250 |==============================================================


OpenSSL 3.1
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 36.0  AVG: 68.0  MAX: 76.0 


OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: AES-128-GCM
byte/s > Higher Is Better
a . 167297223070 |=============================================================
a . 166035190850 |=============================================================


OpenSSL 3.1
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 36  AVG: 73  MAX: 83 


OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: AES-256-GCM
byte/s > Higher Is Better
a . 145908059340 |=============================================================
a . 145499899220 |=============================================================


OpenSSL 3.1
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 37  AVG: 73  MAX: 83 


OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: ChaCha20
byte/s > Higher Is Better
a . 66377467770 |==============================================================
a . 66176670920 |==============================================================


OpenSSL 3.1
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 37  AVG: 70  MAX: 77 


OpenSSL 3.1
Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305
byte/s > Higher Is Better
a . 44524572950 |==============================================================
a . 44375076040 |==============================================================


OpenSSL 3.1
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 37.0  AVG: 66.3  MAX: 75.0 


Crypto++ 8.8
Test: Unkeyed Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
a . 664.71 |===================================================================


Crypto++ 8.8
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 33.0  AVG: 36.3  MAX: 41.0 


Crypto++ 8.8
Test: Keyed Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
a . 979.74 |===================================================================


Crypto++ 8.8
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 32.0  AVG: 35.2  MAX: 37.0 


Cryptsetup
PBKDF2-sha512
Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 2861053 |==================================================================
a . 2864961 |==================================================================


Cryptsetup
PBKDF2-whirlpool
Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 1342606 |==================================================================
a . 1344328 |==================================================================


Cryptsetup
AES-XTS 256b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 7183.5 |===================================================================
a . 7189.2 |===================================================================


Cryptsetup
AES-XTS 256b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 7191.7 |===================================================================


Cryptsetup
Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 1008.6 |===================================================================
a . 1015.9 |===================================================================


Cryptsetup
Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 1048.1 |===================================================================
a . 1047.5 |===================================================================


Cryptsetup
Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 696.2 |===================================================================
a . 702.2 |====================================================================


Cryptsetup
Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 705.1 |====================================================================
a . 706.3 |====================================================================


Cryptsetup
AES-XTS 512b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 6548.5 |===================================================================
a . 6568.3 |===================================================================


Cryptsetup
AES-XTS 512b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 6536.7 |===================================================================
a . 6554.4 |===================================================================


Cryptsetup
Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 1014.4 |===================================================================
a . 1015.2 |===================================================================


Cryptsetup
Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 1046.3 |===================================================================
a . 1046.9 |===================================================================


Cryptsetup
Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 700.6 |====================================================================
a . 700.9 |====================================================================


Cryptsetup
Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 705.7 |====================================================================
a . 698.2 |===================================================================


Cryptsetup
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 31.0  AVG: 35.0  MAX: 38.0 


SecureMark 1.0.4
Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS
marks > Higher Is Better
a . 436031 |===================================================================


SecureMark 1.0.4
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 31.0  AVG: 35.0  MAX: 37.0 


John The Ripper 2023.03.14
Test: MD5
Real C/S > Higher Is Better


John The Ripper 2023.03.14
Test: Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better


John The Ripper 2023.03.14
Test: HMAC-SHA512
Real C/S > Higher Is Better


John The Ripper 2023.03.14
Test: bcrypt
Real C/S > Higher Is Better


John The Ripper 2023.03.14
Test: WPA PSK
Real C/S > Higher Is Better


BLAKE2 20170307

Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better


7-Zip Compression 22.01
Test: Compression Rating
MIPS > Higher Is Better
a . 181781 |===================================================================
a . 179376 |==================================================================


7-Zip Compression 22.01
Test: Decompression Rating
MIPS > Higher Is Better
a . 139265 |===================================================================
a . 135467 |=================================================================


7-Zip Compression 22.01
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 30.0  AVG: 54.7  MAX: 74.0 


Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 717.0 |====================================================================
a . 716.2 |====================================================================


Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 2602.8 |===================================================================
a . 2600.2 |===================================================================


Zstd Compression 1.5.4
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 33.0  AVG: 47.4  MAX: 62.0 


Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 261.7 |====================================================================
a . 263.6 |====================================================================


Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 2616.9 |===================================================================
a . 2613.9 |===================================================================


Zstd Compression 1.5.4
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 33.0  AVG: 44.1  MAX: 58.0 


Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 20.8 |=====================================================================


Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 2259.6 |===================================================================
a . 2266.8 |===================================================================


Zstd Compression 1.5.4
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 32.0  AVG: 39.9  MAX: 48.0 


Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 11.6 |=====================================================================


Zstd Compression 1.5.4
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 2149.9 |===================================================================
a . 2154.9 |===================================================================


Zstd Compression 1.5.4
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 32.0  AVG: 37.3  MAX: 43.0 


LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 12959.18 |=================================================================
a . 12870.52 |=================================================================


LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 14490.7 |==================================================================
a . 14023.9 |================================================================


LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 32.0  AVG: 35.0  MAX: 36.0 


LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 82.66 |===================================================================
a . 83.34 |====================================================================


LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 13042.6 |================================================================
a . 13395.7 |==================================================================


LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 31.0  AVG: 34.6  MAX: 36.0 


LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 80.22 |===================================================================
a . 81.78 |====================================================================


LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
a . 13729.9 |==================================================================
a . 13428.8 |=================================================================


LZ4 Compression 1.9.3
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 30.0  AVG: 34.1  MAX: 36.0 


Gzip Compression
Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 27.17 |====================================================================


Gzip Compression
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 30.0  AVG: 33.9  MAX: 36.0 


Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
Concurrent Requests: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 237521.38 |================================================================


Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 30.0  AVG: 63.9  MAX: 76.0 


Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
Concurrent Requests: 200
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 280008.74 |================================================================


Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 36  AVG: 68  MAX: 79 


Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
Concurrent Requests: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 239893.29 |================================================================


Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 36  AVG: 67  MAX: 78 


Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
Concurrent Requests: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 233649.05 |================================================================


Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 36  AVG: 68  MAX: 78 


nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 100
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better


nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 200
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better


nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better


nginx 1.23.2
Connections: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better


Node.js Express HTTP Load Test

Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 16165 |====================================================================


Node.js Express HTTP Load Test
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 32.0  AVG: 34.9  MAX: 38.0 


MariaDB 11.0.1
Clients: 1024
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 600 |======================================================================


MariaDB 11.0.1
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 32.0  AVG: 53.4  MAX: 60.0 


MariaDB 11.0.1
Clients: 2048
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 597 |======================================================================


MariaDB 11.0.1
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 35.0  AVG: 55.1  MAX: 61.0 


MariaDB 11.0.1
Clients: 4096
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 588 |======================================================================


MariaDB 11.0.1
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 34.0  AVG: 55.9  MAX: 64.0 


MariaDB 11.0.1
Clients: 8192
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 580 |======================================================================


MariaDB 11.0.1
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 35.0  AVG: 57.5  MAX: 66.0 


Apache Cassandra 4.1.3
Test: Writes
Op/s > Higher Is Better
a . 273379 |===================================================================


Apache Cassandra 4.1.3
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 32.0  AVG: 59.6  MAX: 76.0 


ClickHouse 22.12.3.5
100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache
Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better
a . 278.24 |=================================================================
a . 284.83 |===================================================================


ClickHouse 22.12.3.5
100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run
Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better
a . 306.89 |===================================================================
a . 307.95 |===================================================================


ClickHouse 22.12.3.5
100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run
Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better
a . 308.29 |===================================================================
a . 299.48 |=================================================================


ClickHouse 22.12.3.5
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 36.0  AVG: 58.4  MAX: 75.0 


CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 128
ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 165032.1 |=================================================================


CockroachDB 22.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 36  AVG: 68  MAX: 78 


CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 256
ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 160227.2 |=================================================================


CockroachDB 22.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 36  AVG: 69  MAX: 78 


CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 512
ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 151617.2 |=================================================================


CockroachDB 22.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 37  AVG: 68  MAX: 80 


CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 128
ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 111824.5 |=================================================================


CockroachDB 22.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 37  AVG: 67  MAX: 81 


CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 256
ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 112714 |===================================================================


CockroachDB 22.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 37  AVG: 66  MAX: 84 


CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 512
ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 109120.4 |=================================================================


CockroachDB 22.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 37  AVG: 67  MAX: 78 


CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 128
ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 88671.5 |==================================================================


CockroachDB 22.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 38  AVG: 66  MAX: 78 


CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 256
ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 90675.4 |==================================================================


CockroachDB 22.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 37  AVG: 66  MAX: 78 


CockroachDB 22.2
Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 512
ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 89376.7 |==================================================================


CockroachDB 22.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 37  AVG: 66  MAX: 80 


Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 11577157.81 |==============================================================
a . 9888905.51  |=====================================================


Dragonflydb 1.6.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 36.0  AVG: 64.9  MAX: 75.0 


Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 9922346.57 |===============================================================
a . 9708131.62 |==============================================================


Dragonflydb 1.6.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 37.0  AVG: 64.4  MAX: 75.0 


Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 9709511.28 |===============================================================
a . 9757645.11 |===============================================================


Dragonflydb 1.6.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 36.0  AVG: 65.3  MAX: 75.0 


Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 10590148.44 |=============================================================
a . 10726873.47 |==============================================================


Dragonflydb 1.6.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 37.0  AVG: 65.8  MAX: 75.0 


Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 10692476.82 |==============================================================
a . 10587115.38 |=============================================================


Dragonflydb 1.6.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 37.0  AVG: 65.3  MAX: 76.0 


Dragonflydb 1.6.2
Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 10621924.58 |=============================================================
a . 10713157.59 |==============================================================


Dragonflydb 1.6.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 37.0  AVG: 65.1  MAX: 76.0 


Apache CouchDB 3.3.2
Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 52.87 |====================================================================


Apache CouchDB 3.3.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 37.0  AVG: 55.6  MAX: 62.0 


Apache CouchDB 3.3.2
Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 165.72 |===================================================================


Apache CouchDB 3.3.2
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 36.0  AVG: 58.0  MAX: 62.0 


PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 57986 |====================================================================


PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 13.80 |====================================================================


PostgreSQL 15
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 35.0  AVG: 62.0  MAX: 75.0 


PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 1729267 |==================================================================


PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 0.463 |====================================================================


PostgreSQL 15
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 36.0  AVG: 60.6  MAX: 75.0 


PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 48446 |====================================================================


PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 20.64 |====================================================================


PostgreSQL 15
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 36.0  AVG: 60.8  MAX: 74.0 


PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 1722258 |==================================================================


PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 0.581 |====================================================================


PostgreSQL 15
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 36.0  AVG: 63.9  MAX: 76.0 


PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
a . 54564 |====================================================================


PostgreSQL 15
Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 14.66 |====================================================================


PostgreSQL 15
CPU Temperature Monitor
Celsius < Lower Is Better
a . MIN: 36.0  AVG: 55.6  MAX: 70.0 


SQLite 3.41.2
Threads / Copies: 8
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 21.95 |====================================================================


SQLite 3.41.2
Threads / Copies: 16
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 35.74 |====================================================================


SQLite 3.41.2
Threads / Copies: 32
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 65.09 |====================================================================


SQLite 3.41.2
Threads / Copies: 64
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 119.73 |===================================================================


BlogBench 1.1
Test: Read
Final Score > Higher Is Better
a . 1256226 |==================================================================


BlogBench 1.1
Test: Write
Final Score > Higher Is Better
a . 123829 |===================================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: BT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: CG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: FT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: IS.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: LU.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: MG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: SP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: SP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


CP2K Molecular Dynamics 2023.1
Input: H20-64
Seconds < Lower Is Better


CP2K Molecular Dynamics 2023.1
Input: H2O-DFT-LS
Seconds < Lower Is Better


CP2K Molecular Dynamics 2023.1
Input: Fayalite-FIST
Seconds < Lower Is Better


NAMD 2.14
ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms
days/ns < Lower Is Better
a . 0.63788 |==================================================================


Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2

Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better
a . 446613400 |================================================================


libxsmm 2-1.17-3645
M N K: 128
GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better
a . 448.8 |====================================================================


libxsmm 2-1.17-3645
M N K: 256
GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better
a . 529.5 |====================================================================


libxsmm 2-1.17-3645
M N K: 32
GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better
a . 159 |======================================================================


libxsmm 2-1.17-3645
M N K: 64
GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better
a . 294.6 |====================================================================


HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3
Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3
Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 256
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3
Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 512
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3
Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3
Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 256
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3
Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 512
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3
Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3
Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 256
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3
Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 512
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3
Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3
Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 256
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3
Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 512
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


Palabos 2.3
Grid Size: 100
Mega Site Updates Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 88.69 |====================================================================


Palabos 2.3
Grid Size: 400
Mega Site Updates Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 128.73 |===================================================================


Palabos 2.3
Grid Size: 500
Mega Site Updates Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 133.85 |===================================================================


Palabos 2.3
Grid Size: 1000
Mega Site Updates Per Second > Higher Is Better


Remhos 1.0
Test: Sample Remap Example
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 31.52 |====================================================================


SPECFEM3D 4.0
Model: Mount St. Helens
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 33.10 |====================================================================


SPECFEM3D 4.0
Model: Layered Halfspace
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 93.14 |====================================================================


SPECFEM3D 4.0
Model: Tomographic Model
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 32.49 |====================================================================


SPECFEM3D 4.0
Model: Homogeneous Halfspace
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 40.53 |====================================================================


SPECFEM3D 4.0
Model: Water-layered Halfspace
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 85.09 |====================================================================


LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022
Model: 20k Atoms
ns/day > Higher Is Better
a . 16.28 |====================================================================


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: H2
msec < Lower Is Better
a . 2384 |=====================================================================


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Jython
msec < Lower Is Better
a . 1881 |=====================================================================


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Eclipse
msec < Lower Is Better


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Tradesoap
msec < Lower Is Better
a . 1629 |=====================================================================


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Tradebeans
msec < Lower Is Better
a . 1694 |=====================================================================


Renaissance 0.14
Test: Scala Dotty
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 415.8 |====================================================================


Renaissance 0.14
Test: Random Forest
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 378.7 |====================================================================


Renaissance 0.14
Test: ALS Movie Lens
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 7464.7 |===================================================================


Renaissance 0.14
Test: Apache Spark ALS
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 2055.1 |===================================================================


Renaissance 0.14
Test: Apache Spark Bayes
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 703.2 |====================================================================


Renaissance 0.14
Test: Savina Reactors.IO
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 4218.3 |===================================================================


Renaissance 0.14
Test: Apache Spark PageRank
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 1876.2 |===================================================================


Renaissance 0.14
Test: Finagle HTTP Requests
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 2037.6 |===================================================================


Renaissance 0.14
Test: In-Memory Database Shootout
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 1946.0 |===================================================================


Renaissance 0.14
Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 7249.6 |===================================================================


Renaissance 0.14
Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 1056.7 |===================================================================


dav1d 1.2.1
Video Input: Summer Nature 4K
FPS > Higher Is Better
a . 423.32 |===================================================================


dav1d 1.2.1
Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit
FPS > Higher Is Better
a . 717.27 |===================================================================


Embree 4.1
Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 28.80 |====================================================================


Embree 4.1
Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 35.15 |====================================================================


Embree 4.1
Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 30.86 |====================================================================


Kvazaar 2.2
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 17.85 |====================================================================


Kvazaar 2.2
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 18.79 |====================================================================


Kvazaar 2.2
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 42.03 |====================================================================


Kvazaar 2.2
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 51.01 |====================================================================


Kvazaar 2.2
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 67.48 |====================================================================


SVT-AV1 1.6
Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 5.697 |====================================================================


SVT-AV1 1.6
Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 70.00 |====================================================================


SVT-AV1 1.6
Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 196.23 |===================================================================


SVT-AV1 1.6
Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 196.84 |===================================================================


SVT-HEVC 1.5.0
Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 5.52 |=====================================================================


SVT-HEVC 1.5.0
Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 102.76 |===================================================================


SVT-HEVC 1.5.0
Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 144.79 |===================================================================


uvg266 0.4.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 12.03 |====================================================================


uvg266 0.4.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 13.49 |====================================================================


uvg266 0.4.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 38 |=======================================================================


uvg266 0.4.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 40.35 |====================================================================


uvg266 0.4.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 49.28 |====================================================================


VVenC 1.8
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 7.775 |====================================================================


VVenC 1.8
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 15.58 |====================================================================


x265 3.4
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 33.59 |====================================================================


OSPRay 2.12
Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time
Items Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 9.41679 |==================================================================


OSPRay 2.12
Benchmark: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time
Items Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 202.19 |===================================================================


OSPRay 2.12
Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time
Items Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 5.13768 |==================================================================


OSPRay 2.12
Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time
Items Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 4.91313 |==================================================================


Coremark 1.0
CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second
Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better
a . 1023267.15 |===============================================================


Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 155.33 |===================================================================


Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1
Build: defconfig
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 41.11 |====================================================================


Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1
Build: allmodconfig
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 498.60 |===================================================================


Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0
Build System: Ninja
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 307.07 |===================================================================


Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0
Build System: Unix Makefiles
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 334.70 |===================================================================


Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 254.70 |===================================================================


Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6
Build Configuration: Default
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 11.16 |====================================================================


Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6
Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 158.29 |===================================================================


Build2 0.15
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 64.44 |====================================================================


oneDNN 3.1
Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better


oneDNN 3.1
Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better


oneDNN 3.1
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better


oneDNN 3.1
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better


OSPRay Studio 0.11
Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 82978 |====================================================================


OSPRay Studio 0.11
Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 165011 |===================================================================


OSPRay Studio 0.11
Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 85663 |====================================================================


OSPRay Studio 0.11
Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 167692 |===================================================================


OSPRay Studio 0.11
Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 100158 |===================================================================


OSPRay Studio 0.11
Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 195745 |===================================================================


Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 2.07 |=====================================================================


Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 52.05 |====================================================================


Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 3.60 |=====================================================================


Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 2.57 |=====================================================================


Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 1.25 |=====================================================================


Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 0.96 |=====================================================================


Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 0.79 |=====================================================================


Memcached 1.6.19
Set To Get Ratio: 1:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 3262247.03 |===============================================================


Memcached 1.6.19
Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 4650797.51 |===============================================================


Memcached 1.6.19
Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 4328075.91 |===============================================================


Memcached 1.6.19
Set To Get Ratio: 1:100
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 3954544.51 |===============================================================


Redis 7.0.4
Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 6406983 |==================================================================


Redis 7.0.4
Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 4325657 |==================================================================


Redis 7.0.4
Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 3675725.75 |===============================================================


Redis 7.0.4
Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 3820070 |==================================================================


Redis 7.0.4
Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 4955098.5 |================================================================


Redis 7.0.4
Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 4004877.75 |===============================================================


GROMACS 2023
Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare
Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better


TensorFlow 2.12
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 164.39 |===================================================================


TensorFlow 2.12
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 248.77 |===================================================================


TensorFlow 2.12
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: AlexNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 253.75 |===================================================================


TensorFlow 2.12
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 116.46 |===================================================================


TensorFlow 2.12
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 36.84 |====================================================================


TensorFlow 2.12
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 107.6 |====================================================================


TensorFlow 2.12
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 34.99 |====================================================================


TensorFlow 2.12
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: GoogLeNet
images/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 107.91 |===================================================================


TensorFlow 2.12
Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50
images/sec > Higher Is Better


SQLite Speedtest 3.30
Timed Time - Size 1,000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 30.29 |====================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
items/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 15.85 |====================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
ms/batch < Lower Is Better
a . 745.14 |===================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
items/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 422.62 |===================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
ms/batch < Lower Is Better
a . 28.35 |====================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: NLP Sentiment Analysis, 80% Pruned Quantized BERT Base Uncased - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
items/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 177.89 |===================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: NLP Sentiment Analysis, 80% Pruned Quantized BERT Base Uncased - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
ms/batch < Lower Is Better
a . 67.36 |====================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
items/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 55.59 |====================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
ms/batch < Lower Is Better
a . 214.69 |===================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: ResNet-50, Baseline - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
items/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 223.11 |===================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: ResNet-50, Baseline - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
ms/batch < Lower Is Better
a . 53.75 |====================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: ResNet-50, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
items/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 1405.42 |==================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: ResNet-50, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
ms/batch < Lower Is Better
a . 8.5287 |===================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
items/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 99.77 |====================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
ms/batch < Lower Is Better
a . 120.11 |===================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
items/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 19.35 |====================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
ms/batch < Lower Is Better
a . 618.49 |===================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
items/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 224.20 |===================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
ms/batch < Lower Is Better
a . 53.48 |====================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
items/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 97.10 |====================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
ms/batch < Lower Is Better
a . 123.09 |===================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
items/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 132.43 |===================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
ms/batch < Lower Is Better
a . 90.48 |====================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: CV Segmentation, 90% Pruned YOLACT Pruned - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
items/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 21.01 |====================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: CV Segmentation, 90% Pruned YOLACT Pruned - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
ms/batch < Lower Is Better
a . 563.46 |===================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
items/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 217.00 |===================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
ms/batch < Lower Is Better
a . 55.20 |====================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
items/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 65.71 |====================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
ms/batch < Lower Is Better
a . 181.69 |===================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
items/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 16.24 |====================================================================


Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5
Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream
ms/batch < Lower Is Better
a . 726.48 |===================================================================


Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Crypto
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 54375.77 |=================================================================


Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: IO_uring
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 755056.41 |================================================================


Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: CPU Cache
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 3218934.72 |===============================================================


Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: CPU Stress
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 58767.6 |==================================================================


Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Matrix Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 105563.06 |================================================================


Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Vector Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 127050.39 |================================================================


Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Floating Point
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 8948.69 |==================================================================


Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Matrix 3D Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 3046.41 |==================================================================


Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Memory Copying
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 9259.61 |==================================================================


Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Vector Shuffle
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 20623.31 |=================================================================


Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Wide Vector Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 961760.26 |================================================================


Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Fused Multiply-Add
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 29786947.31 |==============================================================


Stress-NG 0.15.10
Test: Vector Floating Point
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
a . 37052.96 |=================================================================


GPAW 23.6
Input: Carbon Nanotube
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 190.27 |===================================================================


Blender 3.6
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 57.25 |====================================================================


Blender 3.6
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 161.49 |===================================================================


Blender 3.6
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 79.55 |====================================================================


Blender 3.6
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 596.59 |===================================================================


Blender 3.6
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 191.42 |===================================================================


Sysbench 1.0.20
Test: RAM / Memory
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
a . 21270.08 |=================================================================


Sysbench 1.0.20
Test: CPU
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
a . 102486.29 |================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
a . 5.36 |=====================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 1486.23 |==================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
a . 3.4 |======================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 2299.22 |==================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
a . 3.41 |=====================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 2316.36 |==================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
a . 367.14 |===================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 21.76 |====================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
a . 17.23 |====================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 461.8 |====================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
a . 883.77 |===================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 9.04 |=====================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
a . 441.39 |===================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 54.29 |====================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
a . 61.15 |====================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 130.81 |===================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
a . 1540.07 |==================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 15.57 |====================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
a . 712.47 |===================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 11.21 |====================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
a . 14499.77 |=================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 1.65 |=====================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
a . 15790.29 |=================================================================


OpenVINO 2022.3
Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 1.52 |=====================================================================


RocksDB 8.0
Test: Random Fill
Op/s > Higher Is Better


RocksDB 8.0
Test: Random Read
Op/s > Higher Is Better


RocksDB 8.0
Test: Update Random
Op/s > Higher Is Better


RocksDB 8.0
Test: Sequential Fill
Op/s > Higher Is Better


RocksDB 8.0
Test: Random Fill Sync
Op/s > Higher Is Better


RocksDB 8.0
Test: Read While Writing
Op/s > Higher Is Better


RocksDB 8.0
Test: Read Random Write Random
Op/s > Higher Is Better


Appleseed 2.0 Beta
Scene: Emily
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 168.81 |===================================================================


Appleseed 2.0 Beta
Scene: Disney Material
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 89.38 |====================================================================


Appleseed 2.0 Beta
Scene: Material Tester
Seconds < Lower Is Better
a . 94.17 |====================================================================


Kripke 1.2.6

Throughput FoM > Higher Is Better


Chaos Group V-RAY 5.02
Mode: CPU
vsamples > Higher Is Better
a . 27036 |====================================================================


OpenCV 4.7
Test: Core
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 41487 |====================================================================


OpenCV 4.7
Test: Image Processing
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 65524 |====================================================================


OpenCV 4.7
Test: Object Detection
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 21470 |====================================================================


OpenCV 4.7
Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network
ms < Lower Is Better
a . 15101 |====================================================================