ttt AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core testing with a GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0-00 v01010101 (F10 BIOS) and ASPEED on Debian 11 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core @ 2.00GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0-00 v01010101 (F10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 8 x 4 GB DDR4-2133MT/s 9ASF51272PZ-2G6E1, Disk: Samsung SSD 960 EVO 500GB + 31GB SanDisk 3.2Gen1, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM57810 10 OS: Debian 11, Kernel: 5.10.0-9-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210110, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 b: Processor: AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core @ 2.00GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0-00 v01010101 (F10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 8 x 4 GB DDR4-2133MT/s 9ASF51272PZ-2G6E1, Disk: Samsung SSD 960 EVO 500GB + 31GB SanDisk 3.2Gen1, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM57810 10 OS: Debian 11, Kernel: 5.10.0-9-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210110, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2.847 |==================================================================== b . 2.868 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 5.261 |==================================================================== b . 5.272 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 7.531 |==================================================================== b . 7.496 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 12.79 |==================================================================== b . 12.38 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 332164.42 |============================================================ b . 356995.83 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 45.26 |==================================================================== b . 40.89 |============================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 451734.90 |============================================================== b . 463638.45 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 95.81 |==================================================================== b . 93.17 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 379790.62 |============================================================= b . 398639.39 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 43.87 |==================================================================== b . 41.87 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 484070.19 |============================================================= b . 504889.93 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 94.65 |==================================================================== b . 91.14 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 471878.27 |============================================================= b . 492192.02 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 38.49 |==================================================================== b . 36.73 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 599091.82 |================================================================ b . 556192.49 |=========================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 79.14 |================================================================ b . 84.60 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 14126820.16 |========================================================== b . 15060911.79 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 123.49 |=================================================================== b . 114.61 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 11918085.33 |====================================== b . 19525243.89 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 397.87 |=================================================================== b . 237.07 |======================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 16841483.53 |============================================================== b . 16534699.15 |============================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 108.51 |=================================================================== b . 107.20 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 10539631.70 |============================================================== b . 1802068.76 |=========== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 423.62 |=========== b . 2600.82 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 12209614.5 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 136.89 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 8583861.09 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency > Higher Is Better a . 518.08 |=================================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 22857.29 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 19750.74 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 18192.44 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraKeyValue - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 22362.51 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 20617.37 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 32 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 29315.40 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 39690.48 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 32 - Num Threads Read: 128 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 31653.75 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 Read Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 41860.99 |================================================================= YugabyteDB 2.19 Workload: CassandraBatchKeyValue, Batch 25 - Num Threads Write: 64 - Num Threads Read: 128 Write Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 8017.75 |================================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 201688.93 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 204333.97 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 220159.53 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 207675.07 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 201762.62 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 219785.60 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 104654 |=================================================================== BRL-CAD 7.36 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better a . 224806 |===================================================================