5800X AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core testing with a ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (4501 BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 4GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (4501 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 4GB (2975/1124MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 21 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel I211 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.5, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.2.5-0ubuntu0.1~22.04.3 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.47), Vulkan: 1.3.224, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 b: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (4501 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 4GB (2975/1124MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 21 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel I211 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.5, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.2.5-0ubuntu0.1~22.04.3 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.47), Vulkan: 1.3.224, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 104 104 104 - RT: 60 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 4.85252 |================================================================== b . 4.85011 |================================================================== miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Small CG Mflops > Higher Is Better a . 5182.39 |================================================================== b . 5175.01 |================================================================== miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 GFInst/s > Higher Is Better a . 463.27 |=================================================================== b . 463.04 |=================================================================== miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 Billion Interactions/s > Higher Is Better a . 18.53 |==================================================================== b . 18.52 |==================================================================== NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better a . 1.78473 |================================================================== b . 1.78324 |================================================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better a . 249308100 |================================================================ b . 249365900 |================================================================ libxsmm 2-1.17-3645 M N K: 32 GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better a . 70.0 |===================================================================== b . 69.9 |===================================================================== libxsmm 2-1.17-3645 M N K: 64 GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better a . 140.1 |==================================================================== b . 140.0 |==================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 20.08 |==================================================================== b . 19.80 |=================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 63.64 |==================================================================== b . 61.25 |================================================================= HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 6.48427 |================================================================== b . 6.48928 |================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 16.74 |==================================================================== b . 16.74 |==================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 15.89 |==================================================================== b . 15.66 |=================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 50.20 |==================================================================== b . 50.31 |==================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 6.17268 |================================================================== b . 6.17409 |================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 15.53 |==================================================================== b . 15.64 |==================================================================== QMCPACK 3.16 Input: Li2_STO_ae Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 230.43 |================================================================== b . 232.27 |=================================================================== QMCPACK 3.16 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 20.76 |==================================================================== b . 20.62 |==================================================================== QMCPACK 3.16 Input: FeCO6_b3lyp_gms Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 135.49 |=================================================================== b . 136.14 |=================================================================== QMCPACK 3.16 Input: FeCO6_b3lyp_gms Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 140.93 |=================================================================== b . 140.31 |=================================================================== Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 31.89 |==================================================================== b . 31.83 |==================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size - Mesh Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 42.47 |==================================================================== b . 42.63 |==================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size - Execution Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 423.92 |=================================================================== b . 423.89 |=================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Mesh Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 340.04 |=================================================================== b . 340.38 |=================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Execution Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 4154.67 |================================================================== b . 4156.54 |================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Bumper Beam Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 144.71 |=================================================================== b . 144.74 |=================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Cell Phone Drop Test Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 114.42 |=================================================================== b . 114.21 |=================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Bird Strike on Windshield Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 306.46 |=================================================================== b . 308.47 |=================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Rubber O-Ring Seal Installation Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 158.10 |=================================================================== b . 157.35 |=================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 646.33 |=================================================================== b . 642.25 |=================================================================== SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Mount St. Helens Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 61.08 |=================================================================== b . 62.33 |==================================================================== SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Layered Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 162.36 |================================================================= b . 166.70 |=================================================================== SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Tomographic Model Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 56.72 |==================================================================== b . 55.65 |=================================================================== SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Homogeneous Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 73.49 |=================================================================== b . 74.77 |==================================================================== SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Water-layered Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 166.81 |=================================================================== b . 167.06 |=================================================================== Z3 Theorem Prover 4.12.1 SMT File: 1.smt2 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 23.37 |=================================================================== b . 23.69 |==================================================================== Z3 Theorem Prover 4.12.1 SMT File: 2.smt2 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 58.46 |================================================================== b . 60.15 |==================================================================== nekRS 23.0 Input: Kershaw flops/rank > Higher Is Better a . 2968330000 |=============================================================== b . 2961160000 |=============================================================== nekRS 23.0 Input: TurboPipe Periodic flops/rank > Higher Is Better a . 4748010000 |=============================================================== b . 4747630000 |=============================================================== LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better a . 5367.75 |================================================================== b . 5378.43 |================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better a . 3.62 |===================================================================== b . 3.62 |===================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better a . 5.71 |===================================================================== b . 5.75 |===================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better a . 1.27 |==================================================================== b . 1.28 |===================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better a . 4.97 |===================================================================== b . 4.99 |===================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better a . 5.66 |==================================================================== b . 5.71 |===================================================================== Xmrig 6.18.1 Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better a . 5576.0 |=================================================================== b . 5485.5 |================================================================== Xmrig 6.18.1 Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better a . 8427.2 |================================================================== b . 8494.2 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 15.8 |===================================================================== b . 15.7 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 1688.0 |=================================================================== b . 1616.4 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 8.94 |===================================================================== b . 8.91 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 1597.0 |=================================================================== b . 1595.1 |=================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Default MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 21.66 |=================================================================== b . 22.04 |==================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100 MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 13.79 |=================================================================== b . 14.03 |==================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 1.82 |===================================================================== b . 1.83 |===================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 4.50 |===================================================================== b . 4.40 |=================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 0.72 |==================================================================== b . 0.73 |===================================================================== srsRAN Project 23.5 Test: Downlink Processor Benchmark Mbps > Higher Is Better a . 924.2 |==================================================================== b . 911.5 |=================================================================== srsRAN Project 23.5 Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Total Mbps > Higher Is Better a . 2239.8 |=================================================================== b . 2241.7 |=================================================================== srsRAN Project 23.5 Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Thread Mbps > Higher Is Better a . 285.9 |==================================================================== b . 283.7 |=================================================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: bcrypt Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 19401 |==================================================================== b . 19399 |==================================================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: WPA PSK Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 43317 |==================================================================== b . 43249 |==================================================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 19372 |==================================================================== b . 19366 |==================================================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: HMAC-SHA512 Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 47882000 |================================================================= b . 47828000 |================================================================= John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 1235000 |================================================================== b . 1232000 |================================================================== Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 8781 |===================================================================== b . 8821 |===================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2.11 |===================================================================== b . 2.10 |===================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1.64 |===================================================================== b . 1.61 |==================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3.35 |===================================================================== b . 3.36 |===================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1.79 |===================================================================== b . 1.79 |===================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better a . 9.42 |==================================================================== b . 9.55 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 10.09 |==================================================================== b . 10.08 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 24.87 |==================================================================== b . 24.89 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 31.01 |==================================================================== b . 30.96 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 40.79 |==================================================================== b . 40.91 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.6 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.990 |==================================================================== b . 4.015 |==================================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2.48 |===================================================================== b . 2.49 |===================================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 46.31 |==================================================================== b . 46.09 |==================================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 84.67 |==================================================================== b . 84.31 |==================================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 54.16 |==================================================================== b . 54.20 |==================================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 58.64 |==================================================================== b . 58.61 |==================================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 48.32 |==================================================================== b . 48.27 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 6.00 |===================================================================== b . 5.95 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 6.72 |===================================================================== b . 6.66 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 32.02 |==================================================================== b . 31.88 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 35.72 |==================================================================== b . 35.41 |=================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 20.59 |==================================================================== b . 20.65 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 21.17 |==================================================================== b . 21.06 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 25.00 |==================================================================== b . 24.98 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 91.03 |==================================================================== b . 91.10 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 95.0 |===================================================================== b . 94.9 |===================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 113.12 |=================================================================== b . 112.55 |=================================================================== VVenC 1.8 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 4.640 |==================================================================== b . 4.564 |=================================================================== VVenC 1.8 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 9.761 |==================================================================== b . 9.618 |=================================================================== VVenC 1.8 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 14.85 |==================================================================== b . 14.70 |=================================================================== VVenC 1.8 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 31.87 |==================================================================== b . 31.57 |=================================================================== x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 15.23 |==================================================================== b . 14.95 |=================================================================== x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 72.85 |==================================================================== b . 67.76 |=============================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 0.40 |===================================================================== b . 0.40 |===================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 0.40 |===================================================================== b . 0.40 |===================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 0.20 |===================================================================== b . 0.20 |===================================================================== OpenVKL 1.3.1 Benchmark: vklBenchmark ISPC Items / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 137 |====================================================================== b . 137 |====================================================================== OpenVKL 1.3.1 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Scalar Items / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 82 |======================================================================= b . 82 |======================================================================= OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.73629 |================================================================== b . 3.72559 |================================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.67249 |================================================================== b . 3.67384 |================================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 118.22 |=================================================================== b . 118.34 |=================================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1.80619 |================================================================== b . 1.79605 |================================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1.68195 |================================================================== b . 1.67206 |================================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2.79526 |================================================================== b . 2.79173 |================================================================== 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better a . 82567 |==================================================================== b . 82052 |==================================================================== 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better a . 76680 |==================================================================== b . 76542 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 68.36 |==================================================================== b . 68.50 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 6 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 6.844 |=================================================================== b . 6.936 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 10.42 |=================================================================== b . 10.60 |==================================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 44.87 |==================================================================== b . 44.73 |==================================================================== Timed Gem5 Compilation 21.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 375.41 |=================================================================== b . 376.29 |=================================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 346.01 |=================================================================== b . 346.15 |=================================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 89.18 |==================================================================== b . 89.31 |==================================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1178.13 |================================================================== b . 1179.64 |================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 732.43 |=================================================================== b . 735.20 |=================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 750.24 |================================================================== b . 765.76 |=================================================================== Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 595.67 |=================================================================== b . 597.52 |=================================================================== Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 54.75 |=================================================================== b . 55.19 |==================================================================== Build2 0.15 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 140.61 |================================================================== b . 142.23 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 2854 |===================================================================== b . 2866 |===================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 3402 |===================================================================== b . 3412 |===================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 45632 |==================================================================== b . 45707 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 95789 |=================================================================== b . 96685 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 54330 |==================================================================== b . 54213 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 112929 |=================================================================== b . 113538 |=================================================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better a . 615.18 |================================================================== b . 621.52 |=================================================================== Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 53.99 |==================================================================== b . 54.07 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 36.76 |==================================================================== b . 36.88 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better a . 137.36 |=================================================================== b . 136.94 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 100.45 |=================================================================== b . 100.90 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better a . 25.14 |==================================================================== b . 25.03 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 146.68 |=================================================================== b . 147.35 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better a . 51.64 |==================================================================== b . 51.41 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 146.86 |=================================================================== b . 147.52 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better a . 51.58 |==================================================================== b . 51.35 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 443.16 |=================================================================== b . 441.89 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 453.50 |=================================================================== b . 447.81 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: scrypt kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 170.33 |=================================================================== b . 170.02 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 9801.20 |================================================================== b . 9781.54 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 2279.46 |================================================================== b . 2276.44 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 482470 |=================================================================== b . 418220 |========================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 2728.92 |================================================================== b . 2706.12 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 86540 |==================================================================== b . 86940 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 19720 |==================================================================== b . 19680 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 29570 |==================================================================== b . 29560 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 87010 |==================================================================== b . 86870 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 205350 |=================================================================== b . 204970 |=================================================================== SecureMark 1.0.4 Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS marks > Higher Is Better a . 323058 |================================================================== b . 328662 |=================================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 14621826720 |============================================================== b . 14624719770 |============================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 4826023170 |=============================================================== b . 4818127190 |=============================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better a . 2627.2 |=================================================================== b . 2631.1 |=================================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better a . 172138.0 |================================================================= b . 172073.2 |================================================================= OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 44193842520 |============================================================== b . 44113971340 |============================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 47547940590 |============================================================== b . 47500649810 |============================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 43510415630 |============================================================== b . 43393548010 |============================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 29833842410 |============================================================== b . 29801235520 |============================================================== Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better a . 16.21 |=================================================================== b . 16.50 |==================================================================== Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 49981000 |================================================================ b . 50397000 |================================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 61116000 |================================================================= b . 61309000 |================================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 196470000 |================================================================ b . 196540000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 221730000 |============================================================ b . 237000000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 380440000 |================================================================ b . 379400000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 458600000 |================================================================ b . 457470000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 11485000 |================================================================ b . 11578000 |================================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 715790000 |================================================================ b . 714580000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 566580000 |================================================================ b . 567100000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 45345000 |================================================================= b . 45097000 |================================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 87262000 |================================================================= b . 87168000 |================================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 156810000 |================================================================ b . 156480000 |================================================================ ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better a . 158.20 |=================================================================== b . 157.72 |=================================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better a . 165.97 |================================================================== b . 167.62 |=================================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better a . 169.36 |=================================================================== b . 169.98 |=================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.2.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 54.61 |==================================================================== b . 54.64 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 2.68 |=================================================================== b . 2.74 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 136.48 |=================================================================== b . 136.90 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 8.13 |==================================================================== b . 8.22 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 2.89 |===================================================================== b . 2.90 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1.92 |===================================================================== b . 1.90 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1.65 |===================================================================== b . 1.53 |================================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1.22 |===================================================================== b . 1.22 |===================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 1552.6 |================================================================== b . 1571.4 |=================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 42285.6 |================================================================= b . 42774.9 |================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 47952.4 |================================================================= b . 48606.3 |================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 49828.8 |================================================================ b . 51051.9 |================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 60057.9 |================================================================== b . 60381.4 |================================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 4014099.71 |=============================================================== b . 3983495.28 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 4152241.76 |============================================================= b . 4274624.07 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3850968.40 |=============================================================== b . 3817695.27 |============================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2406837.21 |============================================================== b . 2434071.42 |=============================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2226645.95 |=============================================================== b . 2239357.41 |=============================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2198073.05 |=============================================================== b . 2193339.91 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3269528.25 |=============================================================== b . 3095044.25 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2743533.25 |=============================================================== b . 2701291.00 |============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3054235.75 |=========================================================== b . 3250610.75 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2761564.75 |=============================================================== b . 2399966.25 |======================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1048.25 |=========================================================== b . 1179.43 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1839.42 |================================================================== b . 1843.40 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better a . 4099.93 |================================================================== b . 4099.93 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better a . 4685.64 |================================================================== b . 4524.06 |================================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2182.43 |================================================================== b . 2096.50 |=============================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3973.97 |================================================================== b . 3973.97 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 265.25 |=================================================================== b . 263.16 |================================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Fast MT/s > Higher Is Better a . 170.22 |=================================================================== b . 169.94 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Medium MT/s > Higher Is Better a . 58.67 |==================================================================== b . 58.56 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Thorough MT/s > Higher Is Better a . 7.1790 |=================================================================== b . 7.1688 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Exhaustive MT/s > Higher Is Better a . 0.7557 |=================================================================== b . 0.7560 |=================================================================== GROMACS 2023 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better a . 1.084 |==================================================================== b . 1.083 |==================================================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2519 |==================================================================== b . 2545 |===================================================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1245 |===================================================================== b . 1233 |==================================================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 883 |==================================================================== b . 903 |====================================================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 887 |====================================================================== b . 877 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 624909 |================================================================= b . 641236 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.80 |===================================================================== b . 0.78 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 633441 |=================================================================== b . 616370 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.263 |================================================================== b . 1.298 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 33312 |==================================================================== b . 33277 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 15.01 |==================================================================== b . 15.03 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 24127 |==================================================================== b . 24055 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 33.16 |==================================================================== b . 33.26 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 96.36 |==================================================================== b . 95.63 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 39.06 |==================================================================== b . 38.94 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 13.09 |==================================================================== b . 13.06 |==================================================================== GNU Octave Benchmark 6.4.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 5.428 |=================================================================== b . 5.509 |==================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Sentiment Analysis, 80% Pruned Quantized BERT Base Uncased - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: CV Segmentation, 90% Pruned YOLACT Pruned - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better Blender 3.6 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 131.70 |=================================================================== b . 132.01 |=================================================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 343.35 |=================================================================== b . 344.09 |=================================================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1273.76 |================================================================== b . 1277.16 |================================================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 405.97 |=================================================================== b . 406.47 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 1.83 |===================================================================== b . 1.82 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 2167.89 |================================================================== b . 2173.37 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 6.02 |===================================================================== b . 6.04 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 663.10 |=================================================================== b . 659.02 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 412.56 |=================================================================== b . 414.15 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 9.69 |===================================================================== b . 9.65 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 28.96 |==================================================================== b . 28.85 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 138.06 |=================================================================== b . 138.50 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 591.76 |=================================================================== b . 591.78 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 13.51 |==================================================================== b . 13.51 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 427.49 |=================================================================== b . 428.02 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 9.34 |===================================================================== b . 9.33 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 10014.83 |================================================================= b . 9886.48 |================================================================ OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.79 |=================================================================== b . 0.81 |===================================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 117664 |=================================================================== b . 117820 |=================================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 51238635 |================================================================= b . 51217028 |================================================================= RocksDB 8.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 583271 |=================================================================== b . 582754 |=================================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 2302029 |================================================================ b . 2386889 |================================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 1970876 |================================================================= b . 2002525 |================================================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better a . 737 |===================================================================== b . 747 |====================================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 81935.83 |================================================================= b . 82086.34 |================================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 80840.39 |================================================================= b . 80917.07 |================================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 73223.97 |================================================================= b . 73261.59 |================================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 67697.55 |================================================================= b . 67761.41 |================================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 173.42 |=================================================================== b . 174.47 |=================================================================== Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Multi Core Score > Higher Is Better a . 11276 |==================================================================== b . 11213 |==================================================================== Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Multi Core Integer Score > Higher Is Better a . 10262 |==================================================================== b . 10203 |==================================================================== Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Multi Core Floating Point Score > Higher Is Better a . 13433 |==================================================================== b . 13360 |==================================================================== Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Single Core Score > Higher Is Better a . 2303 |===================================================================== b . 2281 |==================================================================== Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Single Core Integer Score > Higher Is Better a . 2132 |===================================================================== b . 2112 |==================================================================== Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Single Core Floating Point Score > Higher Is Better a . 2657 |===================================================================== b . 2632 |==================================================================== EnCodec 0.1.1 Target Bandwidth: 3 kbps Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 27.94 |==================================================================== b . 28.02 |==================================================================== EnCodec 0.1.1 Target Bandwidth: 6 kbps Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 28.22 |==================================================================== b . 28.42 |==================================================================== EnCodec 0.1.1 Target Bandwidth: 24 kbps Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 33.19 |==================================================================== b . 33.23 |==================================================================== BRL-CAD 7.34 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better a . 174186 |=================================================================== b . 172877 |================================================================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: Core ms < Lower Is Better a . 54379 |==================================================================== b . 53576 |=================================================================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: Video ms < Lower Is Better a . 27933 |==================================================================== b . 27030 |================================================================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: Stitching ms < Lower Is Better a . 225048 |=================================================================== b . 222673 |================================================================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: Image Processing ms < Lower Is Better a . 95195 |================================================================== b . 98688 |==================================================================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better a . 29944 |=================================================================== b . 30519 |====================================================================