gentoo-ryzen-9-5950x

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (4403 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 2GB on Gentoo 2.13 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2306013-HANG-GENTOOR83
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

C/C++ Compiler Tests 2 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Samsung SSD 990 PRO 1TB
June 01 2023
  37 Minutes
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core
June 01 2023
  37 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  37 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


gentoo-ryzen-9-5950x AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (4403 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 2GB on Gentoo 2.13 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Samsung SSD 990 PRO 1TB: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core @ 3.40GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (4403 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 2 x 32 GB DDR4-3600MT/s Kingston KF3600C18D4, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 990 PRO 1TB + 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T2B0B + 2000GB EZRZ-00Z5HB0 + 8002GB Elements 25A3, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 2GB, Audio: Creative CA0110-IBG, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260 OS: Gentoo 2.13, Kernel: 6.3.1-gentoo-x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.27.5, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.8, Display Driver: NVIDIA 525.116.03, Compiler: GCC 12.2.1 20230428 + Clang 15.0.7 + LLVM 15.0.7, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core @ 3.40GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (4403 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 2 x 32 GB DDR4-3600MT/s Kingston KF3600C18D4, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 990 PRO 1TB + 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T2B0B + 2000GB EZRZ-00Z5HB0 + 8002GB Elements 25A3, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 2GB, Audio: Creative CA0110-IBG, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260 OS: Gentoo 2.13, Kernel: 6.3.1-gentoo-x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.27.5, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.8, Display Driver: NVIDIA 525.116.03, Compiler: GCC 12.2.1 20230428 + Clang 15.0.7 + LLVM 15.0.7, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Crypto++ 8.2 Test: All Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core . 2164.45 |========================================== Samsung SSD 990 PRO 1TB ... 2126.03 |========================================= PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better Samsung SSD 990 PRO 1TB ... 9038 |============================================ AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core . 9259 |============================================= LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better