rabbot 3d AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core testing with a Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F6 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2305147-PTS-RABBOT3D46&sro&gru .
rabbot 3d Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution a b c AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core @ 2.90GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads) Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F6 BIOS) AMD Starship/Matisse 128GB Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz) AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio DELL P2415Q Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 Ubuntu 23.04 6.2.0-20-generic (x86_64) GNOME Shell 44.0 X Server + Wayland 4.6 Mesa 23.0.2 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.49) GCC 12.2.0 ext4 3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise Processor Details - Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x8301055 Graphics Details - BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 256 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-D1820201-101 Security Details - itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Mitigation of untrained return thunk; SMT enabled with STIBP protection + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Retpolines IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected Java Details - b, c: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.18+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu5)
rabbot 3d 3dmark: 1920 x 1080 3dmark: 1920 x 1200 3dmark: 2560 x 1440 3dmark: 3840 x 2160 3dmark: 1600 x 1200 rabbitmq: Simple 2 Publishers + 4 Consumers rabbitmq: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers rabbitmq: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers rabbitmq: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers rabbitmq: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers rabbitmq: Simple 2 Publishers + 4 Consumers rabbitmq: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers rabbitmq: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers rabbitmq: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers rabbitmq: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers a b c 259.10 244.73 170.61 85.80 271.98 155889 69715 37384 58480 47088 162242 69678 37299 61676 49789 259.05 244.61 170.90 85.95 273.88 166564 80032 44046 58307 46236 164361 80168 44142 60795 49963 258.46 243.99 170.87 85.95 272.80 157534 71052 36902 58221 46600 157535 70355 36992 61270 49324 OpenBenchmarking.org
3DMark Wild Life Extreme Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 a b c 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 SE +/- 0.61, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 259.10 259.05 258.46
3DMark Wild Life Extreme Resolution: 1920 x 1200 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 a b c 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.95, N = 3 SE +/- 0.60, N = 3 244.73 244.61 243.99
3DMark Wild Life Extreme Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 a b c 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 170.61 170.90 170.87
3DMark Wild Life Extreme Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 a b c 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 85.80 85.95 85.95
3DMark Wild Life Extreme Resolution: 1600 x 1200 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1 Resolution: 1600 x 1200 a b c 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.94, N = 3 SE +/- 1.78, N = 3 SE +/- 1.08, N = 3 271.98 273.88 272.80
RabbitMQ Scenario: Simple 2 Publishers + 4 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Receiving Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: Simple 2 Publishers + 4 Consumers a b c 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 486.50, N = 2 SE +/- 2265.02, N = 3 155889 166564 157534
RabbitMQ Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Receiving Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers a b c 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 211.71, N = 3 SE +/- 196.00, N = 2 69715 80032 71052
RabbitMQ Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Receiving Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers a b c 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 184.68, N = 3 SE +/- 230.00, N = 2 SE +/- 69.50, N = 2 37384 44046 36902
RabbitMQ Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Receiving Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers a b c 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 126.32, N = 3 SE +/- 424.66, N = 3 SE +/- 85.56, N = 3 58480 58307 58221
RabbitMQ Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Receiving Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers a b c 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 82.65, N = 3 SE +/- 314.17, N = 3 SE +/- 119.14, N = 3 47088 46236 46600
RabbitMQ Scenario: Simple 2 Publishers + 4 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Sending Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: Simple 2 Publishers + 4 Consumers a b c 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 1346.28, N = 9 SE +/- 2222.25, N = 3 SE +/- 1653.75, N = 3 162242 164361 152736
RabbitMQ Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Sending Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers a b c 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 221.72, N = 3 SE +/- 183.96, N = 3 SE +/- 359.49, N = 3 69678 80168 70355
RabbitMQ Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Sending Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers a b c 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 239.15, N = 3 SE +/- 181.81, N = 3 SE +/- 103.45, N = 3 37299 44142 36992
RabbitMQ Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Sending Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers a b c 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 78.05, N = 3 SE +/- 642.61, N = 3 SE +/- 174.76, N = 3 61676 60795 61270
RabbitMQ Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers OpenBenchmarking.org Sending Messages/s, More Is Better RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers a b c 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 459.12, N = 3 SE +/- 424.25, N = 3 SE +/- 554.44, N = 3 49789 49963 49324
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4