rabbot 3d AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core testing with a Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F6 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core @ 2.90GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F6 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 128GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-20-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.0, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.2 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.49), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 b: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core @ 2.90GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F6 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 128GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-20-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.0, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.2 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.49), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 c: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core @ 2.90GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F6 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 128GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-20-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.0, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.2 (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.49), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 259.10 |=================================================================== b . 259.05 |=================================================================== c . 258.46 |=================================================================== 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 244.73 |=================================================================== b . 244.61 |=================================================================== c . 243.99 |=================================================================== 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 170.61 |=================================================================== b . 170.90 |=================================================================== c . 170.87 |=================================================================== 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 85.80 |==================================================================== b . 85.95 |==================================================================== c . 85.95 |==================================================================== 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1 Resolution: 1600 x 1200 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 271.98 |=================================================================== b . 273.88 |=================================================================== c . 272.80 |=================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: Simple 2 Publishers + 4 Consumers Sending Messages/s > Higher Is Better c . 157535 |================================================================ a . 162242 |================================================================== b . 164361 |=================================================================== c . 152736 |============================================================== RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: Simple 2 Publishers + 4 Consumers Receiving Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 155889 |=============================================================== b . 166564 |=================================================================== c . 157534 |=============================================================== RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers Sending Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 69678 |=========================================================== b . 80168 |==================================================================== c . 70355 |============================================================ RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: 10 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers Receiving Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 69715 |=========================================================== b . 80032 |==================================================================== c . 71052 |============================================================ RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers Sending Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 37299 |========================================================= b . 44142 |==================================================================== c . 36992 |========================================================= RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: 60 Queues, 100 Producers, 100 Consumers Receiving Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 37384 |========================================================== b . 44046 |==================================================================== c . 36902 |========================================================= RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers Sending Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 61676 |==================================================================== b . 60795 |=================================================================== c . 61270 |==================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: 120 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers Receiving Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 58480 |==================================================================== b . 58307 |==================================================================== c . 58221 |==================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers Sending Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 49789 |==================================================================== b . 49963 |==================================================================== c . 49324 |=================================================================== RabbitMQ 3.11.16 Scenario: 200 Queues, 400 Producers, 400 Consumers Receiving Messages/s > Higher Is Better a . 47088 |==================================================================== b . 46236 |=================================================================== c . 46600 |===================================================================