FirstPhoronixOpenCLtest AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 12-Core testing with a ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI (0925 BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 6700/6700 XT/6750 XT / 6800M/6850M 12GB on Debian 12 via the Phoronix Test Suite. base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 12-Core @ 4.70GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI (0925 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14d8, Memory: 2 x 32 GB DDR5-5600MT/s CMT64GX5M2X5600C40, Disk: Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 1000GB, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 6700/6700 XT/6750 XT / 6800M/6850M 12GB, Audio: AMD Navi 21/23, Monitor: PHL 246E9Q, Network: Intel I225-V OS: Debian 12, Kernel: 6.1.0-7-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: Xfce, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3513.0), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Darktable 4.2.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 9.761 |============== Darktable 4.2.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 2.351 |============== Darktable 4.2.1 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 0.149 |============== Darktable 4.2.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 0.624 |============== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D GFLOPS > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 102.51 |============= SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 20.66 |============== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP GFLOPS > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 1185.71 |============ SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash GHash/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 16.95 |============== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 611.68 |============= SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N GFLOPS > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 4698.03 |============ SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops GFLOPS > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 21042717 |=========== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 28.85 |============== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 25.27 |============== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 661.62 |============= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL BFS Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL Histo Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL TPACF Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenCL MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Myocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 64.78 |============== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Heartwall Seconds < Lower Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 5.373 |============== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 7.631 |============== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenCL Particle Filter Seconds < Lower Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 4.342 |============== cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Copy GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 299.6 |============== cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Read GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 387.6 |============== cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Write GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 332.1 |============== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Kernel Latency us < Lower Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 14.06 |============== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Integer Compute GIOPS > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 3193.96 |============ clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Integer 24-bit Compute GIOPS > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 11033.56 |=========== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth GBPS > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 363.42 |============= clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Compute GFLOPS > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 835.45 |============= clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Compute GFLOPS > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 12217.73 |=========== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueReadBuffer GBPS > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 2.84 |=============== clpeak 1.1.2 OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueWriteBuffer GBPS > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 8.57 |=============== MandelGPU 1.3pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT Samples/sec > Higher Is Better ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 97.44 |============== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 101.3 |============== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - sDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 86.59 |============== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 41.7 |=============== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 64.2 |=============== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 74.44 |============== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-N GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 92.1 |=============== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-T GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 111.8 |============== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 63.3 |=============== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 60.7 |=============== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 67.5 |=============== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 64.7 |=============== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 461 |================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 647 |================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - sDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 333 |================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dCOPY GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 293 |================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dAXPY GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 326 |================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dDOT GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 351 |================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-N GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 94.0 |=============== ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMV-T GB/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 321 |================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 740 |================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-NT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 755 |================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TN GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 728 |================ ViennaCL 1.7.1 Test: OpenCL BLAS - dGEMM-TT GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 748 |================ FluidX3D 2.3 Test: FP32-FP32 MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 1365 |=============== FluidX3D 2.3 Test: FP32-FP16C MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 2929 |=============== FluidX3D 2.3 Test: FP32-FP16S MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better base line, mostly aiming at ensuring some functionality . 2914 |=============== JuliaGPU 1.2pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT Samples/sec > Higher Is Better Lulesh OpenCL 2017-07-06 z/s > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Hotel Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Hotel Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Hotel Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Microphone Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Microphone Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Hotel Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Microphone Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Microphone Score > Higher Is Better LuxMark 3.1 OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR Score > Higher Is Better MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT Samples/sec > Higher Is Better OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06 Test: LU Decomposition ms < Lower Is Better OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06 Test: Compressed Sparse Row ms < Lower Is Better OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06 Test: Cyclic Redundancy Check ms < Lower Is Better SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT - Scene: Caustic Samples/sec > Higher Is Better SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT - Scene: Cornell Samples/sec > Higher Is Better SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1 OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT - Scene: Caustic3 Samples/sec > Higher Is Better Xsbench OpenCL 2017-07-06 Lookups/s > Higher Is Better