test
Intel Core i7-6700T testing with a ASUS EX-B150M-V (0306 BIOS) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 1GB on CentOS 7.9.2009 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Intel Core i7-6700T: 

	Processor: Intel Core i7-6700T @ 3.60GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS EX-B150M-V (0306 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 1 x 8192 MB DDR4-2133MT/s CRUCIAL, Disk: 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM001-1ER1, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: VA2016w-2, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411

	OS: CentOS 7.9.2009, Kernel: 3.10.0-1160.88.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 470.182.03, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Vulkan: 1.2.175, Compiler: GCC 9.3.1 20200408 + CUDA 11.1, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050


Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7

Seconds < Lower Is Better


QMCPACK 3.13
Input: simple-H2O
Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better


Timed HMMer Search 3.3.2

Seconds < Lower Is Better


Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471
Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i7-6700T . 99.84 |==================================================


Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i7-6700T . 2887.56 |================================================


High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1

GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: BT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: CG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: FT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: IS.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: LU.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: MG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: SP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: SP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-HPL


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ffte


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-DGEMM


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ptrans


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Random Access


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Latency


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth


miniFE 2.2
Problem Size: Small
CG Mflops > Higher Is Better


Pennant 1.0.1
Test: sedovbig
Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better


Pennant 1.0.1
Test: leblancbig
Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better


Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11
Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11
Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11
Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2019-03-24

Seconds < Lower Is Better


LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022
Model: 20k Atoms
ns/day > Higher Is Better


LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022
Model: Rhodopsin Protein
ns/day > Higher Is Better


Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2

Seconds < Lower Is Better


ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MPI
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-P2P PingPong
Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong
Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better


GROMACS 2023
Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare
Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better


GROMACS 2023
Implementation: NVIDIA CUDA GPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare
Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better


GPAW 22.1
Input: Carbon Nanotube
Seconds < Lower Is Better