2023-04-14-0825 AMD EPYC 7313P 16-Core testing with a ASRockRack ROMED8HM3 (L3.31A BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: Processor: AMD EPYC 7313P 16-Core @ 3.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack ROMED8HM3 (L3.31A BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 4 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40EB3-CWE, Disk: 256GB Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G + 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 + 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZQL21T9HCJR-00A07 + 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ7L31T9, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: L1530S, Network: 4 x Intel I350 + 8 x Broadcom BCM57504 NetXtreme-E 10Gb/25Gb/40Gb/50Gb/100Gb/200Gb OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-20-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 23.0.2 (LLVM 15.0.7 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.082 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 607540 |================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.888 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 900803 |================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.544 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 919003 |================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.271 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 920764 |================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.107 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 932379 |================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.023 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 44659 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.052 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 957871 |================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1.079 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 927 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 345.32 |================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 724 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.993 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1007472 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 100.71 |================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 994 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.018 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 55087 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.787 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1016221 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.490 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1020161 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 45.96 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1088 |================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.242 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1034951 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.096 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1045001 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.047 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1052307 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.795 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1259 |================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.016 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 61422 |================================================= MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 8192 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 375 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 4096 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 372 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 2048 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 354 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 1024 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 342 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 310 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 292 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 335 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 607 |=================================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2311 |================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1757544.58 |============================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2317845.42 |============================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1809706.37 |============================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1773181.25 |============================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2064898.77 |============================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2330743.32 |============================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1760213.10 |============================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 3013628.25 |============================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2576915.67 |============================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2080415.50 |============================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2298589.83 |============================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2972341.58 |============================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2633247.75 |============================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2070232.94 |============================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2972969.57 |============================================ Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2200766.18 |============================================ Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2274214.02 |============================================ Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 926785.31 |============================================= Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2245072.77 |============================================ Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1472556.36 |============================================ Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2790892.40 |============================================ Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 3024539.94 |============================================ Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2931329.03 |============================================ Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2741418.59 |============================================ Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2978932.50 |============================================ Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2825607.96 |============================================ CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 68851.3 |=============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 55037.8 |=============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 53366.7 |=============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 42660.9 |=============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 70495.5 |=============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 71993.0 |=============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 71256.5 |=============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 56246.4 |=============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 56007.0 |=============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 48856.4 |=============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 53413.9 |=============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 53934.0 |=============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 42718.5 |=============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 43787.6 |=============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 40453.0 |=============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 29083.3 |=============================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 339.9 |================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 336.8 |================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 335.2 |================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 341.0 |================================================= Apache CouchDB 3.2.2 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 453.62 |================================================ Apache CouchDB 3.2.2 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 129.98 |================================================ Apache CouchDB 3.2.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 274.25 |================================================ Apache CouchDB 3.2.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 81.37 |================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 12.2 |================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 81558.30 |============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 12.3 |================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 80863.05 |============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 12.3 |================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 81366.20 |============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 12.2 |================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 81364.11 |============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 12.2 |================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 81784.49 |============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 12.0 |================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 83067.36 |============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2.2 |=================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 45585.30 |============================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 264.21 |================================================ ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 261.71 |================================================ ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 234.51 |================================================ Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 11.51 |================================================= OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 46271346460 |=========================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 67122362140 |=========================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 73661862917 |=========================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 68781981153 |=========================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 267102.8 |============================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 4086.5 |================================================ OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 7488470303 |============================================ OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 22993726407 |=========================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.00118925 |============================================ Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 0.11210261 |============================================ ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1081928 |=============================================== Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 5462 |================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 4.5 |=================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 3.76 |================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1.03 |================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 4.29 |================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 3 |===================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 29778 |================================================= BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2583441 |=============================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 22.32 |================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 160.16 |================================================ LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 22.1 |================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 155.62 |================================================ LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 37.13 |================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 22.49 |================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 162.75 |================================================ LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 21.7 |================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 164.61 |================================================ LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 21.5 |================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2919.86 |=============================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1.2 |=================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 21.89 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1.808 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 559 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 7.112 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 7065 |================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2731.23 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 370 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2361.41 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 345 |=================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 1017.02 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 500 |=================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2.3 |=================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 44304.62 |============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2.2 |=================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 45023.16 |============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2.2 |=================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 45103.01 |============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2.2 |=================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 45449.69 |============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 2.2 |=================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G . 44786.61 |==============================================