rpi ex ARMv8 Cortex-A72 testing with a BCM2835 Raspberry Pi 400 Rev 1.0 and vc4drmfb on Debian 11 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: ARMv8 Cortex-A72 @ 1.80GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: BCM2835 Raspberry Pi 400 Rev 1.0, Chipset: Broadcom BCM2711, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 128GB SF128, Graphics: vc4drmfb, Monitor: DELL P2210H OS: Debian 11, Kernel: 5.15.84-v8+ (aarch64), Desktop: LXDE, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210110, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 b: Processor: ARMv8 Cortex-A72 @ 1.80GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: BCM2835 Raspberry Pi 400 Rev 1.0, Chipset: Broadcom BCM2711, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 128GB SF128, Graphics: vc4drmfb, Monitor: DELL P2210H OS: Debian 11, Kernel: 5.15.84-v8+ (aarch64), Desktop: LXDE, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210110, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 c: Processor: ARMv8 Cortex-A72 @ 1.80GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: BCM2835 Raspberry Pi 400 Rev 1.0, Chipset: Broadcom BCM2711, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 128GB SF128, Graphics: vc4drmfb, Monitor: DELL P2210H OS: Debian 11, Kernel: 5.15.84-v8+ (aarch64), Desktop: LXDE, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210110, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 RocksDB 8.0 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 62556 |==================================================================== b . 62505 |==================================================================== c . 59015 |================================================================ RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 145 |============================== b . 240 |================================================== c . 336 |====================================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 47023 |======================================================== b . 56747 |==================================================================== c . 50029 |============================================================ RocksDB 8.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 38369 |==================================================================== b . 37271 |================================================================== c . 36682 |================================================================= RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 6309354 |================================================================== b . 6122384 |================================================================ c . 5938311 |============================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Sched Pipe ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 38391 |==================================================================== b . 38058 |=================================================================== c . 36250 |================================================================ perf-bench Benchmark: Syscall Basic ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 782616 |=================================================================== b . 779932 |=================================================================== c . 780312 |=================================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Memset 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better a . 5.001976 |============================================================ b . 4.911948 |=========================================================== c . 5.449490 |================================================================= RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 270616 |================================================================== b . 270505 |================================================================== c . 272997 |=================================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 162245 |================================================================= b . 165586 |================================================================== c . 167316 |=================================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Memcpy 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2.681491 |================================================================= b . 2.690354 |================================================================= c . 2.668307 |================================================================ perf-bench Benchmark: Epoll Wait ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 113368 |=================================================================== b . 113361 |=================================================================== c . 113048 |=================================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Lock-Pi ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2504 |===================================================================== b . 2500 |===================================================================== c . 2504 |===================================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Hash ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 633949 |=================================================================== b . 626149 |================================================================== c . 631335 |===================================================================