2023-02-26-0032
Docker testing on Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS via the Phoronix Test Suite.


ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores: 

	Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores @ 3.90GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI (0602 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 4 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB + 1000GB Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB + 500GB Western Digital WDS500G2B0B, Graphics: ASPEED 16GB (2450MHz), Audio: Intel Device 4f92, Monitor: 2 x DELL U2312HM + 28E850, Network: 2 x Intel 10G X550T

	OS: Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS, Kernel: 6.2.0-1275.native (x86_64), OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 + OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3513.0), Compiler: GCC 11.3.0 + LLVM 15.0.3, File-System: overlayfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080, System Layer: Docker


Darktable 3.8.1
Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 6.442 |==================


Darktable 3.8.1
Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 2.741 |==================


Darktable 3.8.1
Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 0.275 |==================


Darktable 3.8.1
Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 1.847 |==================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 78.46 |==================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 418.21 |=================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash
GHash/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 6.1742 |=================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 112.00 |=================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 609.52 |=================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 810320 |=================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 11.21 |==================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 2.9990 |=================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 440.04 |=================


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL BFS
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL LBM
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL Histo
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL TPACF
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenCL MRI Gridding
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL LavaMD
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Myocyte
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 443.93 |=================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Heartwall
Seconds < Lower Is Better


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Leukocyte
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 4.889 |==================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenCL Particle Filter
Seconds < Lower Is Better


cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Copy
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 132.7 |==================


cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Read
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 108.9 |==================


cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Write
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 113.8 |==================


clpeak
OpenCL Test: Kernel Latency
us < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 110.73 |=================


clpeak
OpenCL Test: Integer Compute INT


clpeak
OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Float
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 2502.28 |================


clpeak
OpenCL Test: Double-Precision Double


clpeak
OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth
GBPS > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 116.14 |=================


clpeak
OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueReadBuffer
GBPS > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 1.98 |===================


clpeak
OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueWriteBuffer
GBPS > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 10.54 |==================


MandelGPU 1.3pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - sCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 126 |====================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - sAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 191 |====================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - sDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 158 |====================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 56.5 |===================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 85.4 |===================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 76.3 |===================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-N
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 71.8 |===================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-T
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 81.0 |===================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 82.5 |===================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 76.0 |===================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TN
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 95.3 |===================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TT
GFLOPs/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 80.3 |===================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - sCOPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 124 |====================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - sAXPY
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 129 |====================


ViennaCL 1.7.1
Test: OpenCL BLAS - sDOT
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 96.7 |===================


FluidX3D 2.3
Test: FP32-FP32
MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 4250 |===================


FluidX3D 2.3
Test: FP32-FP16C
MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 5091 |===================


FluidX3D 2.3
Test: FP32-FP16S
MLUPs/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores . 5222 |===================


JuliaGPU 1.2pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better


Lulesh OpenCL 2017-07-06

z/s > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Hotel
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Hotel
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Hotel
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Microphone
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Microphone
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Hotel
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Microphone
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Microphone
Score > Higher Is Better


LuxMark 3.1
OpenCL Device: Hybrid GPU - Scene: Luxball HDR
Score > Higher Is Better


MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better


OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06
Test: LU Decomposition
ms < Lower Is Better


OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06
Test: Compressed Sparse Row
ms < Lower Is Better


OpenDwarfs 2013-11-06
Test: Cyclic Redundancy Check
ms < Lower Is Better


SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT - Scene: Caustic
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better


SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT - Scene: Cornell
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better


SmallPT GPU 1.6pts1
OpenCL Device: GPU - Resolution: $VIDEO_WIDTH x $VIDEO_HEIGHT - Scene: Caustic3
Samples/sec > Higher Is Better


Xsbench OpenCL 2017-07-06

Lookups/s > Higher Is Better