workingspeed Intel Core i7-13700KF testing with a ASUS ROG STRIX B660-F GAMING WIFI (2212 BIOS) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB on Microsoft Windows 11 Pro Build 22621 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2302061-NE-WORKINGSP05&grs .
workingspeed Processor Motherboard Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Display Driver OpenCL File-System Screen Resolution Computer Working full speed Intel Core i7-13700KF @ 3.40GHz (16 Cores / 24 Threads) ASUS ROG STRIX B660-F GAMING WIFI (2212 BIOS) 2 x 32768 MB 5600MHz F5-5600J3636D32G 932GB Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB + 1863GB Netac NVMe SSD 2TB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB USB Audio 2.0 + NVIDIA Virtual Audio Device (Wave Extensible) (WDM) + NVIDIA HD Audio DELL S71DG 2 x Realtek PCIe GbE + Bluetooth Device (Personal Area ) + Realtek RTL8852AE WiFi 6 802.11ax PCIe + Intel (3) I225-V + Bluetooth Device (Personal Area ) #2 Microsoft Windows 11 Pro Build 22621 10.0.22621.1105 (x86_64) 526.98 (31.0.15.2698) OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.0.89 NTFS 2560x1440 OpenBenchmarking.org - CPU Microcode: 000000000E010000 - Python 3.7.9 - VBS: Disabled
workingspeed v-ray: CPU v-ray: NVIDIA CUDA GPU v-ray: NVIDIA RTX GPU tesseract-ocr: Time To OCR 7 Images git: Time To Complete Common Git Commands pyperformance: pickle_pure_python pyperformance: django_template pyperformance: python_startup pyperformance: regex_compile pyperformance: crypto_pyaes pyperformance: json_loads pyperformance: raytrace pyperformance: pathlib pyperformance: nbody pyperformance: float pyperformance: chaos pyperformance: 2to3 pyperformance: go blender: Pabellon Barcelona - NVIDIA OptiX blender: Pabellon Barcelona - NVIDIA CUDA blender: Pabellon Barcelona - CPU-Only blender: Barbershop - NVIDIA OptiX blender: Fishy Cat - NVIDIA OptiX blender: Classroom - NVIDIA OptiX blender: Barbershop - NVIDIA CUDA blender: Fishy Cat - NVIDIA CUDA blender: Classroom - NVIDIA CUDA blender: Barbershop - CPU-Only blender: Fishy Cat - CPU-Only blender: Classroom - CPU-Only blender: BMW27 - NVIDIA OptiX blender: BMW27 - NVIDIA CUDA blender: BMW27 - CPU-Only astcenc: Exhaustive astcenc: Thorough astcenc: Medium astcenc: Fast y-cruncher: 1B compress-7zip: Decompression Rating compress-7zip: Compression Rating x264: Bosphorus 1080p x264: Bosphorus 4K svt-av1: Preset 13 - Bosphorus 1080p svt-av1: Preset 12 - Bosphorus 1080p svt-av1: Preset 8 - Bosphorus 1080p svt-av1: Preset 4 - Bosphorus 1080p svt-av1: Preset 13 - Bosphorus 4K svt-av1: Preset 12 - Bosphorus 4K svt-av1: Preset 8 - Bosphorus 4K svt-av1: Preset 4 - Bosphorus 4K dav1d: Chimera 1080p 10-bit dav1d: Summer Nature 1080p dav1d: Summer Nature 4K dav1d: Chimera 1080p john-the-ripper: MD5 john-the-ripper: Blowfish osbench: Memory Allocations osbench: Create Threads intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - All Reads intel-mlc: Idle Latency paraview: Wavelet Contour - 2560 x 1440 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 2560 x 1440 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Many Spheres - 2560 x 1440 paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080 xonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Ultimate xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimate unvanquished: 2560 x 1440 - Medium unvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - Medium unvanquished: 2560 x 1440 - Ultra unvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra unvanquished: 2560 x 1440 - High unvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - High hashcat: TrueCrypt RIPEMD160 + XTS hashcat: SHA-512 hashcat: SHA1 hashcat: MD5 osbench: Launch Programs osbench: Create Files paraview: Wavelet Contour - 2560 x 1440 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 2560 x 1440 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Many Spheres - 2560 x 1440 paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080 hashcat: 7-Zip Computer Working full speed 20746 1420 1820 37.467 49.252 267 33.1 33.3 105 67.0 17.1 280 83.9 73.2 68.8 68.5 227 138 26.06 88.89 256.96 85.87 17.08 23.85 152.04 36.72 36.01 815.40 104.59 219.83 9.42 17.43 80.11 1.4232 13.7881 106.1767 284.7644 24.310 102604 147622 223.47 54.55 645.537 642.296 157.244 12.349 171.079 162.495 53.456 3.988 743.16 1355.79 394.83 961.23 1366667 27685 32.0268 75.437 80689.9 78602.8 80956.9 81487.7 85064.6 80696.13 78683.43 81622.65 82135.59 85015.18 76.0 165.54 165.30 165.52 165.43 53.66 53.67 411.3636648 411.6207264 416.3 419.8 404.4 403.5 416.8 416.1 483833 1856333333 12783566667 40801800000 8190.214 147.107028 1725.130 1722.652 2648.279 2646.895 5379.272 5380.346 534425 OpenBenchmarking.org
Chaos Group V-RAY Mode: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org vsamples, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 5.02 Mode: CPU Computer Working full speed 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 17.27, N = 3 20746
Chaos Group V-RAY Mode: NVIDIA CUDA GPU OpenBenchmarking.org vpaths, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 5.02 Mode: NVIDIA CUDA GPU Computer Working full speed 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 1420
Chaos Group V-RAY Mode: NVIDIA RTX GPU OpenBenchmarking.org vrays, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 5.02 Mode: NVIDIA RTX GPU Computer Working full speed 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 1820
Tesseract OCR Time To OCR 7 Images OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tesseract OCR v4.0.0.20181030 Time To OCR 7 Images Computer Working full speed 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 37.47
Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Computer Working full speed 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 49.25 1. git version 2.36.1.windows.1
PyPerformance Benchmark: pickle_pure_python OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Computer Working full speed 60 120 180 240 300 267
PyPerformance Benchmark: django_template OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Computer Working full speed 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 33.1
PyPerformance Benchmark: python_startup OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Computer Working full speed 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.34, N = 15 33.3
PyPerformance Benchmark: regex_compile OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Computer Working full speed 20 40 60 80 100 105
PyPerformance Benchmark: crypto_pyaes OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Computer Working full speed 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 67.0
PyPerformance Benchmark: json_loads OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Computer Working full speed 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 17.1
PyPerformance Benchmark: raytrace OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Computer Working full speed 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 280
PyPerformance Benchmark: pathlib OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Computer Working full speed 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 83.9
PyPerformance Benchmark: nbody OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Computer Working full speed 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 73.2
PyPerformance Benchmark: float OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Computer Working full speed 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 68.8
PyPerformance Benchmark: chaos OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Computer Working full speed 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 68.5
PyPerformance Benchmark: 2to3 OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Computer Working full speed 50 100 150 200 250 227
PyPerformance Benchmark: go OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Computer Working full speed 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 138
Blender Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.4 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Computer Working full speed 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 26.06
Blender Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.4 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA Computer Working full speed 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 88.89
Blender Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.4 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Computer Working full speed 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 256.96
Blender Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.4 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Computer Working full speed 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 85.87
Blender Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.4 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Computer Working full speed 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 17.08
Blender Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.4 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Computer Working full speed 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 23.85
Blender Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.4 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA Computer Working full speed 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 152.04
Blender Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.4 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA Computer Working full speed 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 36.72
Blender Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.4 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA Computer Working full speed 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 36.01
Blender Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.4 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Computer Working full speed 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 815.40
Blender Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.4 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Computer Working full speed 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.66, N = 3 104.59
Blender Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.4 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Computer Working full speed 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 219.83
Blender Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.4 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Computer Working full speed 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 9.42
Blender Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.4 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA CUDA Computer Working full speed 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 17.43
Blender Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.4 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Computer Working full speed 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 80.11
ASTC Encoder Preset: Exhaustive OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Exhaustive Computer Working full speed 0.3202 0.6404 0.9606 1.2808 1.601 SE +/- 0.0071, N = 3 1.4232
ASTC Encoder Preset: Thorough OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Thorough Computer Working full speed 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 13.79
ASTC Encoder Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Medium Computer Working full speed 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 106.18
ASTC Encoder Preset: Fast OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Fast Computer Working full speed 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.91, N = 3 284.76
Y-Cruncher Pi Digits To Calculate: 1B OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Y-Cruncher 0.7.10.9513 Pi Digits To Calculate: 1B Computer Working full speed 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 24.31
7-Zip Compression Test: Decompression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating Computer Working full speed 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 867.58, N = 3 102604
7-Zip Compression Test: Compression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating Computer Working full speed 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 278.68, N = 3 147622
x264 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x264 2022-02-22 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Computer Working full speed 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 223.47
x264 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x264 2022-02-22 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Computer Working full speed 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 54.55
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.4 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Computer Working full speed 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 3.02, N = 3 645.54
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.4 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Computer Working full speed 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 1.96, N = 3 642.30
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.4 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Computer Working full speed 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.60, N = 3 157.24
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.4 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Computer Working full speed 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 12.35
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.4 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Computer Working full speed 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 171.08
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.4 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Computer Working full speed 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 162.50
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.4 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Computer Working full speed 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 53.46
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.4 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Computer Working full speed 0.8973 1.7946 2.6919 3.5892 4.4865 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 3.988
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit Computer Working full speed 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 0.95, N = 3 743.16
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p Computer Working full speed 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 2.12, N = 3 1355.79
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 4K OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K Computer Working full speed 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 394.83
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p Computer Working full speed 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.91, N = 3 961.23
John The Ripper Test: MD5 OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Computer Working full speed 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 2848.00, N = 3 1366667
John The Ripper Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Computer Working full speed 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 69.10, N = 3 27685
OSBench Test: Memory Allocations OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Computer Working full speed 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 32.03
OSBench Test: Create Threads OpenBenchmarking.org us Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Create Threads Computer Working full speed 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.80, N = 3 75.44
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like Computer Working full speed 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 32.06, N = 3 80689.9
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes Computer Working full speed 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 65.83, N = 3 78602.8
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes Computer Working full speed 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 41.22, N = 3 80956.9
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes Computer Working full speed 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 70.06, N = 3 81487.7
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads Computer Working full speed 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 25.61, N = 3 85064.6
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like Computer Working full speed 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 134.20, N = 3 80696.13
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes Computer Working full speed 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 65.76, N = 3 78683.43
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes Computer Working full speed 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 63.58, N = 3 81622.65
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes Computer Working full speed 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 82.07, N = 3 82135.59
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads Computer Working full speed 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 135.21, N = 3 85015.18
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Idle Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Idle Latency Computer Working full speed 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 76.0
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Computer Working full speed 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 165.54
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Computer Working full speed 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 165.30
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Computer Working full speed 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 165.52
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Computer Working full speed 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 165.43
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Computer Working full speed 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 53.66
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Computer Working full speed 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 53.67
Xonotic Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.5 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Computer Working full speed 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 1.74, N = 3 411.36 MIN: 98 / MAX: 878
Xonotic Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.5 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Computer Working full speed 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 2.39, N = 3 411.62 MIN: 98 / MAX: 875
Unvanquished Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.54 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Medium Computer Working full speed 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 5.03, N = 3 416.3
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.54 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Medium Computer Working full speed 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 4.57, N = 4 419.8
Unvanquished Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.54 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultra Computer Working full speed 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 2.50, N = 3 404.4
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.54 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Computer Working full speed 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 3.67, N = 3 403.5
Unvanquished Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.54 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: High Computer Working full speed 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 5.39, N = 3 416.8
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.54 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Computer Working full speed 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 4.01, N = 6 416.1
Hashcat Benchmark: TrueCrypt RIPEMD160 + XTS OpenBenchmarking.org H/s, More Is Better Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: TrueCrypt RIPEMD160 + XTS Computer Working full speed 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 835.33, N = 3 483833
Hashcat Benchmark: SHA-512 OpenBenchmarking.org H/s, More Is Better Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: SHA-512 Computer Working full speed 400M 800M 1200M 1600M 2000M SE +/- 635959.47, N = 3 1856333333
Hashcat Benchmark: SHA1 OpenBenchmarking.org H/s, More Is Better Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: SHA1 Computer Working full speed 3000M 6000M 9000M 12000M 15000M SE +/- 21199554.50, N = 3 12783566667
Hashcat Benchmark: MD5 OpenBenchmarking.org H/s, More Is Better Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: MD5 Computer Working full speed 9000M 18000M 27000M 36000M 45000M SE +/- 117082577.70, N = 3 40801800000
OSBench Test: Launch Programs OpenBenchmarking.org us Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Launch Programs Computer Working full speed 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 275.12, N = 12 8190.21
OSBench Test: Create Files OpenBenchmarking.org us Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Create Files Computer Working full speed 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.51, N = 15 147.11
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Computer Working full speed 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.76, N = 3 1725.13
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Computer Working full speed 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 3.79, N = 3 1722.65
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Computer Working full speed 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 1.03, N = 3 2648.28
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Computer Working full speed 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 2.58, N = 3 2646.90
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Computer Working full speed 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 11.56, N = 3 5379.27
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Computer Working full speed 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 5.03, N = 3 5380.35
Hashcat Benchmark: 7-Zip OpenBenchmarking.org H/s, More Is Better Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: 7-Zip Computer Working full speed 110K 220K 330K 440K 550K SE +/- 27695.37, N = 12 534425
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5