Intel Core i9-9900 testing with a Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF (F16a BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB on ManjaroLinux 22.0.0 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2301299-NE-LNXBUILD947
lnxbuild-9-9900,
"Numpy Benchmark - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"numpy",411.78,403.27,408.8
"numpy-110A",416.69,415.13,415.57
"numpy-95A",413.33,420.13,411.42
"numpy-130A",415.76,420.52,420.26
"Intel Core i9-9900",458.43,461.03,451.53
"oneDNN 2.0 - Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-110A",2155.34,2371.16,2236.27,2206.39,2188.75,2226.57
"Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 - Build: defconfig",
Lower Results Are Better
"Intel Core i9-9900",150.151,148.876,147.283
"Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.18 - Build: defconfig",
Lower Results Are Better
"Intel Core i9-9900",128.863,129.53,126.875
"Timed HMMer Search 3.3.1 - Pfam Database Search",
Lower Results Are Better
"hmmer-130A",104.616,104.588,104.589
"Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 - Time To Compile",
Lower Results Are Better
"lnxbuild-i9-9900-20201213",94.742,93.641,93.28
"lnxbuild-i9-9900-20201213",93.916,92.667,92.396
"build-linux-kernel-110A",105.674,103.559,103.307
"build-linux-kernel-110A-2nd",106.458,103.539,103.757
"build-linux-ker-95A-perf",113.44,111.276,110.867
"build-linux-kernel-130A",100.161,97.74,97.33
"oneDNN 2.0 - Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn",3525.33,3517.99,3530.1
"onednn-2nd",3381.95,3369.17,3379.05
"onednn-100A",4077.52,4105.73,4231.33
"onednn-85A",4641.53,4639.62,4938.82,4628.05
"onednn-95A-perf",4411.01,4344.16,4287.06
"onednn-130A",3683.06,3657.71,3646.92
"oneDNN 2.0 - Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-100A",4078.77,4076.03,4063.72
"onednn-85A",4620.89,4627.17,4585.27
"onednn-95A-perf",4279.59,4271.98,4286.63
"onednn-130A",3655.26,3649.26,3637.02
"onednn-avx-130A",3908.67,3852.72,3811.2
"oneDNN 2.0 - Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn",3520.46,3559.43,3730.9
"onednn-100A",4108.92,4066.48,4097.31
"onednn-85A",4599.07,4637.12,4621.29
"onednn-95A-perf",4270.24,4266.46,4267.76
"onednn-130A",3660.97,3660.38,3739.53
"oneDNN 2.0 - Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-110A",2207.64,2232.36,2336.2
"onednn-avx-130A",2136.59,2130.92,2137.93
"oneDNN 2.0 - Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU",
Lower Results Are Better
"onednn-110A",2223.84,2206.16,2210.33
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed",29014.06,28768.75,28770.94
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed",27177.69,26898.2,26897.26
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed",28186.24,27790.42,27601.41
"LuxCoreRender 2.3 - Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism",
Higher Results Are Better
"luxcorerender-130A",1.6666666666667,1.6630909090909,1.6534545454545
"LuxCoreRender 2.3 - Scene: DLSC",
Higher Results Are Better
"luxcorerender-130A",1.5008771929825,1.5401754385965,1.4921428571429
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed",28101.53,28134.45,28093.59
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed",28973.65,29090.85,29029.71
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed",27297.32,27149.48,26890.64
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed",29079.55,28961.22,29125.58
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed",29159.99,29058.66,28983.29
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed",27284.86,27143.64,27038.4
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed",27357.6,27413.15,27268.59
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Sharpen",
Higher Results Are Better
"graphics-magick-2.02",127,125,124
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Enhanced",
Higher Results Are Better
"graphics-magick-2.02",199,198,197
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Noise-Gaussian",
Higher Results Are Better
"graphics-magick-2.02",252,250,249
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Resizing",
Higher Results Are Better
"graphics-magick-2.02",914,919,916
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Swirl",
Higher Results Are Better
"graphics-magick-2.02",391,384,381
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Rotate",
Higher Results Are Better
"graphics-magick-2.02",917,923,869
"GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: HWB Color Space",
Higher Results Are Better
"graphics-magick-2.02",999,985,989
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"lz4",10688.7,10645,10711.8
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"lz4",54.9,54.83,52.93
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"lz4",10719,10618.2,10674.4
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"lz4",56.15,55.98,53.86
"x265 3.4 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K",
Higher Results Are Better
"x265",13.97,13.36,13.9
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"lz4",10990.3,10967,11022.7
"LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed",
Higher Results Are Better
"lz4",8956.02,9057.01,9057.84
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark2-130A",738.6,740.92,735.82
"PyBench 2018-02-16 - Total For Average Test Times",
Lower Results Are Better
"Intel Core i9-9900 - AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB -",904,897,899
"Cython benchmark 0.27 - ",
Lower Results Are Better
"cython-i9-9900",19.193,19.45,19.168
"x265 3.4 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p",
Higher Results Are Better
"x265",58.64,59.32,58.17
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark2-130A",1346.63,1351.61,1344.57
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark2-130A",1060.38,1066.29,1058.8
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark2-130A",839.05,841.92,834.75
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark2-130A",288.92,286.3,283.01
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark2-130A",158,158.49,158