xeon platinum 8280 2023 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 testing with a GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 21.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 4.00GHz (56 Cores / 112 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 384GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 1GbE + 2 x QLogic FastLinQ QL41000 10/25/40/50GbE OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-49-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.4, Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 b: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 4.00GHz (56 Cores / 112 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 384GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 1GbE + 2 x QLogic FastLinQ QL41000 10/25/40/50GbE OS: Ubuntu 21.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-49-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.4, Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 8.82 |===================================================================== b . 8.87 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 9.06 |===================================================================== b . 9.08 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 33.06 |==================================================================== b . 33.25 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 34.20 |==================================================================== b . 33.56 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 17.02 |==================================================================== b . 16.99 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 22.36 |==================================================================== b . 22.48 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 25.91 |==================================================================== b . 25.98 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 73.05 |==================================================================== b . 69.55 |================================================================= Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 97.08 |==================================================================== b . 94.90 |================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 119.74 |=================================================================== b . 118.28 |================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 7.71 |===================================================================== b . 7.69 |===================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 8.40 |===================================================================== b . 8.46 |===================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 23.33 |=================================================================== b . 23.69 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 25.25 |==================================================================== b . 25.28 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 18.86 |==================================================================== b . 18.75 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 22.08 |==================================================================== b . 22.03 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 21.65 |==================================================================== b . 21.03 |================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 59.51 |==================================================================== b . 59.80 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 68.30 |==================================================================== b . 67.77 |=================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 79.04 |==================================================================== b . 79.21 |==================================================================== OpenVKL 1.3.1 Benchmark: vklBenchmark ISPC Items / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 520 |====================================================================== b . 522 |====================================================================== OpenVKL 1.3.1 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Scalar Items / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 255 |====================================================================== b . 253 |===================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.30989 |================================================================== b . 1.29942 |================================================================= oneDNN 3.0 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 3.00282 |================================================================== b . 3.02197 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.39001 |================================================================= b . 1.40389 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.08776 |=============================================================== b . 1.13263 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 3.71301 |================================================================== b . 3.69864 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 2.10746 |================================================================== b . 2.11619 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 3.93265 |================================================================== b . 3.88472 |================================================================= oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 18.61 |==================================================================== b . 18.57 |==================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.21248 |================================================================== b . 1.21791 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 3.64132 |================================================================== b . 3.62224 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.434424 |================================================================ b . 0.438820 |================================================================= oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.331943 |================================================================ b . 0.336858 |================================================================= oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 876.58 |=================================================================== b . 877.97 |=================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 457.84 |=================================================================== b . 458.51 |=================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 875.66 |=================================================================== b . 878.29 |=================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 3.14259 |================================================================== b . 3.13757 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 4.84062 |================================================================== b . 4.85450 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 4.43676 |================================================================== b . 4.43490 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 463.67 |=================================================================== b . 453.86 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.327524 |================================================================= b . 0.329008 |================================================================= oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 876.44 |================================================================== b . 890.45 |=================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 467.10 |=================================================================== b . 460.99 |================================================================== oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.194345 |=============================================================== b . 0.199945 |================================================================= oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 2.45477 |================================================================== b . 2.27592 |============================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 380.0 |==================================================================== b . 358.2 |================================================================ CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 400.6 |==================================================================== b . 365.6 |============================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 381.8 |================================================================== b . 391.7 |==================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 360.0 |=================================================================== b . 366.9 |==================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 65449.2 |================================================================= b . 66632.8 |================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 67990.0 |================================================================== b . 68326.9 |================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 67125.8 |================================================================== b . 66853.5 |================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 80437.3 |============================================================== b . 85022.7 |================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 81102.6 |============================================================ b . 89629.3 |================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 76437.2 |============================================================ b . 84220.0 |================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 85674.0 |============================================================== b . 91688.8 |================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 86044.5 |================================================================== b . 84529.4 |================================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 90837.1 |================================================================== b . 89886.1 |================================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 110812.8 |================================================================= b . 99710.0 |========================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 256 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 98761.4 |================================================================= b . 99967.9 |================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 512 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 101544.0 |================================================================= b . 91775.4 |=========================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 65744.1 |================================================================== b . 63330.8 |================================================================ CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 82225.7 |================================================================== b . 73573.9 |=========================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 86582.7 |================================================================== b . 85611.1 |================================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 1024 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 101568.6 |================================================================= b . 94955.4 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1564863 |================================================================= b . 1584160 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.064 |==================================================================== b . 0.063 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1690140 |============================================================== b . 1795519 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.148 |==================================================================== b . 0.139 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1759394 |================================================================ b . 1809420 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.284 |==================================================================== b . 0.276 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1787570 |================================================================== b . 1715536 |=============================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.448 |================================================================= b . 0.466 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1365 |===================================================================== b . 1363 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 73.25 |==================================================================== b . 73.37 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1785534 |================================================================== b . 1651399 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.560 |=============================================================== b . 0.606 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 752 |====================================================================== b . 714 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 332.49 |================================================================ b . 350.08 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 366 |====================================================================== b . 239 |============================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1366.38 |=========================================== b . 2089.94 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 279 |====================================================================== b . 260 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 2868.83 |============================================================== b . 3073.44 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 236 |====================================================================== b . 234 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 4233.60 |================================================================= b . 4274.62 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1499937 |================================================================== b . 1509915 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.067 |==================================================================== b . 0.066 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1785647 |================================================================== b . 1793551 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.140 |==================================================================== b . 0.139 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1802196 |================================================================== b . 1805423 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.277 |==================================================================== b . 0.277 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1783440 |================================================================== b . 1707442 |=============================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.449 |================================================================= b . 0.469 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 58725 |==================================================================== b . 58760 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.703 |==================================================================== b . 1.702 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1638286 |============================================================== b . 1745701 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.610 |==================================================================== b . 0.573 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 64820 |=================================================================== b . 65615 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 3.857 |==================================================================== b . 3.810 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 62985 |==================================================================== b . 62982 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 7.938 |==================================================================== b . 7.939 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 55873 |==================================================================== b . 55920 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 14.32 |==================================================================== b . 14.31 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 50653 |==================================================================== b . 50366 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 19.74 |==================================================================== b . 19.86 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 18.52 |==================================================================== b . 18.46 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 753.02 |=================================================================== b . 754.14 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 9.85 |===================================================================== b . 9.89 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 1407.71 |================================================================== b . 1404.10 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 9.73 |===================================================================== b . 9.70 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 1429.13 |================================================================== b . 1430.60 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 682.54 |=================================================================== b . 672.12 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 20.45 |=================================================================== b . 20.78 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 69.52 |==================================================================== b . 69.60 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 201.21 |=================================================================== b . 200.93 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 2888.87 |================================================================== b . 2889.46 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 4.82 |===================================================================== b . 4.82 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 1819.10 |================================================================== b . 1824.35 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 30.67 |==================================================================== b . 30.59 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 187.05 |=================================================================== b . 186.77 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 74.75 |==================================================================== b . 74.85 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 6929.07 |================================================================== b . 6948.20 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 8.07 |===================================================================== b . 8.05 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 1289.59 |================================================================== b . 1286.83 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 10.81 |==================================================================== b . 10.83 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 48267.15 |================================================================= b . 48001.20 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.15 |===================================================================== b . 1.15 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 53593.95 |================================================================= b . 53495.65 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.03 |===================================================================== b . 1.03 |===================================================================== BRL-CAD 7.34 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better a . 405341 |=================================================================== b . 401379 |==================================================================