3970x janny AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core testing with a ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1603 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 3.70GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1603 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 980 PRO 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-051900rc7-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.47), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 b: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 3.70GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1603 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 980 PRO 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-051900rc7-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.47), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 c: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 3.70GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1603 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 980 PRO 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-051900rc7-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.47), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 14.11 |==================================================================== b . 14.15 |==================================================================== c . 14.16 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 14.58 |==================================================================== b . 14.37 |=================================================================== c . 14.53 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 35.61 |==================================================================== b . 35.43 |==================================================================== c . 35.49 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 37.10 |==================================================================== b . 37.07 |==================================================================== c . 37.00 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 27.09 |==================================================================== b . 27.06 |==================================================================== c . 27.17 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 37.82 |==================================================================== b . 37.76 |==================================================================== c . 37.72 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 48.59 |==================================================================== b . 48.63 |==================================================================== c . 48.76 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 83.12 |==================================================================== b . 83.02 |==================================================================== c . 82.93 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 121.77 |=================================================================== b . 122.02 |=================================================================== c . 122.05 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 158.13 |=================================================================== b . 156.73 |================================================================== c . 157.78 |=================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 11.66 |==================================================================== b . 11.40 |================================================================== c . 11.50 |=================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 12.93 |==================================================================== b . 12.93 |==================================================================== c . 12.83 |=================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 23.80 |==================================================================== b . 23.73 |==================================================================== c . 23.67 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 26.72 |==================================================================== b . 26.64 |==================================================================== c . 26.47 |=================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 31.45 |==================================================================== b . 31.18 |=================================================================== c . 31.37 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 32.89 |=================================================================== b . 33.24 |==================================================================== c . 32.82 |=================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 36.31 |==================================================================== b . 36.32 |==================================================================== c . 36.07 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 77.83 |==================================================================== b . 77.45 |==================================================================== c . 77.17 |=================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 84.34 |==================================================================== b . 84.58 |==================================================================== c . 84.45 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 95.14 |=================================================================== b . 96.03 |==================================================================== c . 95.74 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 42004 |============================================================== b . 43694 |================================================================ c . 46223 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.024 |==================================================================== b . 0.023 |================================================================= c . 0.022 |============================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 603 |==================================================================== b . 620 |====================================================================== c . 353 |======================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.658 |======================================== b . 1.612 |======================================= c . 2.831 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1128575 |================================================================== b . 1125061 |================================================================== c . 1120548 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.044 |================================================================== b . 0.044 |================================================================== c . 0.045 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1585153 |================================================================ b . 1623423 |================================================================== c . 1597964 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.063 |==================================================================== b . 0.062 |=================================================================== c . 0.063 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1603249 |================================================================== b . 1603612 |================================================================== c . 1552388 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.156 |================================================================== b . 0.156 |================================================================== c . 0.161 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 404 |====================================================================== b . 353 |============================================================= c . 353 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 123.72 |=========================================================== b . 141.69 |=================================================================== c . 141.46 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1563403 |================================================================== b . 1572161 |================================================================== c . 1560166 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.320 |==================================================================== b . 0.318 |==================================================================== c . 0.320 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1446697 |================================================================== b . 1433592 |================================================================= c . 1427182 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.553 |=================================================================== b . 0.558 |==================================================================== c . 0.561 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 52102 |==================================================================== b . 50864 |================================================================== c . 51949 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.019 |================================================================= b . 0.020 |==================================================================== c . 0.019 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 341 |===================================================================== b . 347 |====================================================================== c . 345 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 293.24 |=================================================================== b . 287.81 |================================================================== c . 290.18 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1398445 |================================================================== b . 1385009 |================================================================= c . 1374765 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.715 |=================================================================== b . 0.722 |==================================================================== c . 0.727 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 333 |===================================================================== b . 336 |===================================================================== c . 340 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 750.59 |=================================================================== b . 743.56 |================================================================== c . 736.27 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 285 |=============================================================== b . 263 |========================================================== c . 315 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1756.28 |============================================================= b . 1899.90 |================================================================== c . 1585.36 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 252 |===================================================================== b . 238 |================================================================= c . 255 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 3173.15 |============================================================== b . 3367.42 |================================================================== c . 3136.96 |============================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 337 |==================================================================== b . 345 |====================================================================== c . 345 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 2.966 |==================================================================== b . 2.899 |================================================================== c . 2.901 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1083535 |================================================================== b . 1082808 |================================================================== c . 1070418 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.046 |=================================================================== b . 0.046 |=================================================================== c . 0.047 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 46496 |=================================================================== b . 47308 |==================================================================== c . 46489 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.022 |==================================================================== b . 0.021 |================================================================= c . 0.022 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 221 |================================================================ b . 242 |====================================================================== c . 229 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 4517.56 |================================================================== b . 4132.04 |============================================================ c . 4362.72 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1527865 |================================================================== b . 1506230 |================================================================= c . 1524505 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.065 |=================================================================== b . 0.066 |==================================================================== c . 0.066 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1491405 |================================================================== b . 1496314 |================================================================== c . 1500264 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.168 |==================================================================== b . 0.167 |==================================================================== c . 0.167 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 5823 |===================================================================== b . 5693 |=================================================================== c . 5436 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 8.586 |=============================================================== b . 8.783 |================================================================= c . 9.198 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1436132 |================================================================== b . 1431659 |================================================================== c . 1430853 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.348 |==================================================================== b . 0.349 |==================================================================== c . 0.349 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1344929 |================================================================== b . 1348464 |================================================================== c . 1331721 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.595 |=================================================================== b . 0.593 |=================================================================== c . 0.601 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 337 |====================================================================== b . 338 |====================================================================== c . 335 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 2.970 |==================================================================== b . 2.960 |=================================================================== c . 2.986 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 959682 |=================================================================== b . 955463 |=================================================================== c . 961185 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.052 |==================================================================== b . 0.052 |==================================================================== c . 0.052 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 8568 |===================================================================== b . 7487 |============================================================ c . 7298 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 11.67 |========================================================== b . 13.36 |================================================================== c . 13.70 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1278137 |================================================================== b . 1267167 |================================================================= c . 1264630 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.782 |=================================================================== b . 0.789 |==================================================================== c . 0.791 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 10705 |==================================================================== b . 9060 |========================================================== c . 8807 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 23.35 |======================================================== b . 27.59 |================================================================== c . 28.39 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 11281 |==================================================================== b . 9282 |======================================================== c . 9278 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 44.32 |======================================================== b . 53.87 |==================================================================== c . 53.89 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 11347 |==================================================================== b . 9485 |========================================================= c . 9234 |======================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 70.51 |======================================================= b . 84.34 |================================================================== c . 86.64 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1001640 |================================================================== b . 992199 |================================================================= c . 996136 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.100 |=================================================================== b . 0.101 |==================================================================== c . 0.100 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 1020130 |================================================================== b . 1019127 |================================================================== c . 1013396 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.245 |=================================================================== b . 0.245 |=================================================================== c . 0.247 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 6193 |===================================================================== b . 5335 |=========================================================== c . 4811 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 8.074 |==================================================== b . 9.372 |============================================================ c . 10.392 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 990459 |=================================================================== b . 979185 |================================================================== c . 988510 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.505 |=================================================================== b . 0.511 |==================================================================== c . 0.506 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 931257 |================================================================= b . 924730 |================================================================= c . 954907 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.859 |==================================================================== b . 0.865 |==================================================================== c . 0.838 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 10848 |==================================================================== b . 9871 |============================================================== c . 9939 |============================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 92.19 |============================================================= b . 101.31 |=================================================================== c . 100.61 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 8499 |===================================================================== b . 6133 |================================================== c . 6026 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 11.77 |================================================ b . 16.31 |=================================================================== c . 16.60 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 854969 |=================================================================== b . 850353 |=================================================================== c . 853764 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.170 |==================================================================== b . 1.176 |==================================================================== c . 1.171 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 9942 |===================================================================== b . 6322 |============================================ c . 5799 |======================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 25.15 |======================================== b . 39.54 |============================================================== c . 43.11 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 8347 |===================================================================== b . 6195 |=================================================== c . 5709 |=============================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 59.90 |=============================================== b . 80.71 |=============================================================== c . 87.57 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 8738 |===================================================================== b . 6854 |====================================================== c . 6210 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 91.55 |================================================ b . 116.72 |============================================================= c . 128.83 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 9575 |===================================================================== b . 7007 |================================================== c . 6826 |================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 104.44 |================================================ b . 142.71 |================================================================= c . 146.50 |=================================================================== BRL-CAD 7.34 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better a . 536874 |=================================================================== b . 536774 |=================================================================== c . 533462 |===================================================================