2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 testing with a LENOVO (A1KT46AUS BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 2GB on Linuxmint 21 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2212175-NE-ALPHACENT42
alphacentauri
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 testing with a LENOVO (A1KT46AUS BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 2GB on Linuxmint 21 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
linux-kernel-build-conf1-6c16g:
Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 @ 2.80GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO (A1KT46AUS BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 2 x 240GB INTEL SSDSC2BW24, Graphics: NVIDIA NVC8 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC662 rev3, Monitor: HP L1950, Network: Intel 82579LM + Intel 82574L
OS: Linuxmint 21, Kernel: 5.15.0-41-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 5.4.8, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 22.0.1, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024
2x6c_2x16GdualCh:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 @ 2.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO (A1KT46AUS BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2 x 240GB INTEL SSDSC2BW24, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro 4000 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC662 rev3, Monitor: DELL E198WFP, Network: Intel 82579LM + Intel 82574L
OS: Linuxmint 21, Kernel: 5.15.0-56-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 5.4.12, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.157, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1440x900
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 @ 2.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO (A1KT46AUS BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2 x 240GB INTEL SSDSC2BW24, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro 4000 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC662 rev3, Monitor: DELL E198WFP, Network: Intel 82579LM + Intel 82574L
OS: Linuxmint 21, Kernel: 5.15.0-56-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 5.4.12, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.157, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1440x900
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-HPL
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 48.88 |=============================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 49.11 |=============================================
Timed GCC Compilation 11.2.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1970.06 |===========================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1965.41 |===========================================
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.18
Build: allmodconfig
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1919.45 |===========================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0
Build System: Unix Makefiles
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1115.13 |===========================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0
Build System: Ninja
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1052.35 |===========================================
Timed Node.js Compilation 18.8
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1036.93 |===========================================
Timed Gem5 Compilation 21.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 715.29 |============================================
LuaRadio 0.9.1
Test: Complex Phase
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 311.9 |=============================================
LuaRadio 0.9.1
Test: Hilbert Transform
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 55.7 |==============================================
LuaRadio 0.9.1
Test: FM Deemphasis Filter
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 235.2 |=============================================
LuaRadio 0.9.1
Test: Five Back to Back FIR Filters
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 472.7 |=============================================
GNU Radio
Test: Hilbert Transform
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 225.6 |=============================================
GNU Radio
Test: FM Deemphasis Filter
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 388.7 |=============================================
GNU Radio
Test: IIR Filter
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 234.5 |=============================================
GNU Radio
Test: FIR Filter
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 349.0 |=============================================
GNU Radio
Test: Signal Source (Cosine)
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1298.4 |============================================
GNU Radio
Test: Five Back to Back FIR Filters
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 434.2 |=============================================
Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark
runs/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 4.15 |==============================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM
UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 4.5 |===============================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM
eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 9.2 |===============================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1586.1 |============================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1589.8 |============================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 23.8 |=============================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 24.4 |==============================================
Build2 0.13
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 219.69 |============================================
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 211.55 |============================================
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.18
Build: defconfig
Seconds < Lower Is Better
linux-kernel-build-conf1-6c16g . 294.90 |======================================
2x6c_2x16GdualCh ............... 160.72 |=====================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 ....... 161.55 |=====================
Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 197.28 |============================================
Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6
Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 570.65 |============================================
Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 176.54 |============================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: raytrace
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 955 |===============================================
Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 136.39 |============================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1818.4 |============================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1809.0 |============================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 300.9 |==========================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 319.2 |=============================================
SQLite Speedtest 3.30
Timed Time - Size 1,000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 128.82 |============================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1840.7 |============================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1854.1 |============================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 364.4 |=============================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 365.0 |=============================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: 2to3
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 689 |===============================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1720.0 |============================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1709.1 |============================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 398.7 |=============================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 384.2 |===========================================
ACES DGEMM 1.0
Sustained Floating-Point Rate
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.867792 |==========================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.859928 |==========================================
Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 120.64 |============================================
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 118.61 |============================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 118.76 |============================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: go
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 456 |===============================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: OFDM_Test
Samples / Second > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 46933333 |==========================================
Git
Time To Complete Common Git Commands
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 95.47 |=============================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM
UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 62.6 |==============================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM
eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 209.6 |=============================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: python_startup
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 19.1 |==============================================
Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 91.16 |=============================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 90.94 |=============================================
Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 86.79 |=============================================
simdjson 2.0
Throughput Test: Kostya
GB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.10 |==============================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM
UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 58.6 |==============================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM
eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 186.8 |=============================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: regex_compile
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 347 |===============================================
simdjson 2.0
Throughput Test: LargeRandom
GB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 0.46 |==============================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1516.8 |===========================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1551.3 |============================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 26.6 |=============================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 27.1 |==============================================
Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.5
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 62.32 |=============================================
C-Blosc 2.3
Test: blosclz bitshuffle
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 2465.2 |============================================
simdjson 2.0
Throughput Test: DistinctUserID
GB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.46 |==============================================
simdjson 2.0
Throughput Test: PartialTweets
GB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.35 |==============================================
simdjson 2.0
Throughput Test: TopTweet
GB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.46 |==============================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: nbody
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 268 |===============================================
Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 48.31 |=============================================
PyBench 2018-02-16
Total For Average Test Times
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 2021 |==============================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: chaos
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 228 |===============================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM
UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 66.7 |==============================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM
eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 210.4 |=============================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1680.0 |============================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1693.9 |============================================
Zstd Compression 1.5.0
Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1426.3 |============================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1442.0 |============================================
Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 42.47 |=============================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 42.81 |=============================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: django_template
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 123 |===============================================
Cryptsetup
Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 217.2 |=============================================
Cryptsetup
Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 235.2 |=============================================
Cryptsetup
Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 233.9 |=============================================
Cryptsetup
Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 227.6 |=============================================
Cryptsetup
AES-XTS 512b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1021.4 |============================================
Cryptsetup
AES-XTS 512b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1031.6 |============================================
Cryptsetup
Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 235.5 |=============================================
Cryptsetup
Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 232.5 |=============================================
Cryptsetup
Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 217.3 |=============================================
Cryptsetup
Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 222.6 |=============================================
Cryptsetup
AES-XTS 256b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1282.9 |============================================
Cryptsetup
AES-XTS 256b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1285.8 |============================================
Cryptsetup
PBKDF2-whirlpool
Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 316726 |============================================
Cryptsetup
PBKDF2-sha512
Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 794777 |============================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: float
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 206 |===============================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: crypto_pyaes
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 206 |===============================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM
UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 63.6 |==============================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM
eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 190.1 |=============================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: pathlib
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 50.8 |==============================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: pickle_pure_python
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 982 |===============================================
C-Blosc 2.3
Test: blosclz shuffle
MB/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 4744.6 |============================================
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2
Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 250077433 |=========================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: json_loads
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 49.0 |==============================================
Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31
Threads: 24 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57
samples/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 345713333 |=========================================
Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31
Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57
samples/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 311723333 |=========================================
Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31
Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57
samples/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 206330000 |=========================================
Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31
Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57
samples/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 106156667 |=========================================
Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31
Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57
samples/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 52599667 |==========================================
Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31
Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57
samples/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 27680333 |==========================================
ArrayFire 3.7
Test: BLAS CPU
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 405.13 |============================================
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 408.69 |============================================
Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6
Build Configuration: Default
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 38.97 |=============================================